Citation Analysis – Difference-in-Differences Estimators When No Unit Remains Untreated

Difference-in-Differences Estimators When No Unit Remains Untreated
Clément de Chaisemartin, Diego Ciccia, Xavier D'Haultfœuille, Felix Knau
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.04465

102

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

8,592

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Pierce, J. R. and P. K. Schott	2016	8	5	14.0	0.078	0.957	88%
2	Calonico, S., M. D. Cattaneo, and M. H. Farrell	2018	6	5	9.0	0.059	0.941	83%
3	Imbens, G. and K. Kalyanaraman	2012	4	3	6.5	0.039	0.928	100%
4	Stute, W., W. G. Manteiga, and M. P. Quindimil	1998	4	3	6.5	0.039	0.928	100%
5	Garrett, D. G., E. Ohrn, and J. C. Suárez Serrato		5	4	8.5	0.049	0.928	80%
6	Stute, W	1997	7	4	9.5	0.069	0.894	71%
7	de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille (self)	2020	3	3	3.5	0.029	0.843	100%
8	Calonico, S., M. D. Cattaneo, and R. Titiunik	2014	3	3	4.5	0.029	0.843	100%
9	Li, G., C. Ling, and Z. Tan	2024	3	2	6.0	0.029	0.737	100%
10	de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D’Haultfoeuille (self)	2024	2	2	4.0	0.020	0.644	100%
11	Calonico, S., M. D. Cattaneo, and M. H. Farrell	2019	2	2	4.0	0.020	0.644	100%
12	Callaway, B., A. Goodman-Bacon, and P. H. Sant'Ann...	2024	3	1	1.5	0.029	0.585	100%
13	Dustmann, C., A. Lindner, U. Schönberg, M. Umkehre...		2	2	1.5	0.020	0.511	50%
14	de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille (self)	2018	2	1	1.0	0.020	0.511	100%
15	de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille (self)	2021	2	2	1.0	0.020	0.511	50%
16	Fricke, H	2017	2	1	1.0	0.020	0.511	100%
17	Duggan, M. and F. Scott Morton	2010	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
18	Enikolopov, R., M. Petrova, and E. Zhuravskaya	2011	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
19	de Chaisemartin, C (self)	2011	1	1	1.0	0.010	0.406	100%
20	Blundell, R. and M. C. Dias	2009	1	1	0.5	0.010	0.406	100%
21	Haxhiu, E. and T. Helgerman	2024	1	1	0.5	0.010	0.406	100%
22	Caetano, C	2015	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
23	Haanwinckel, D		1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
24	de Chaisemartin, C., X. D’Haultfoeuille, F. Pasqui... (self)	2022	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
25	Graham, B. S. and J. L. Powell	2012	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
26	Sasaki, Y. and T. Ura	2021	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
27	de Chaisemartin, C., D. Ciccia, X. D'Haultfoeuille... (self)	2024b	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
28	de Chaisemartin, C., D. Ciccia, X. D'Haultfoeuille... (self)	2024a	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
29	de Chaisemartin, C., D. C. X. D'Haultfœuille, and ... (self)	2024	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
30	Blandhol, C., J. Bonney, M. Mogstad, and A. Torgov...	2022	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
31	Imbens, G. W., D. B. Rubin, and B. I. Sacerdote	2001	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
32	Imbens, G. and Y. Xu	2024	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
33	de Chaisemartin, C., D. Ciccia, X. D'Haultfoeuille... (self)	2024d	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
34	de Chaisemartin, C., D. Ciccia, X. D'Haultfoeuille... (self)	2024c	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
35	Imbens, G. W. and M. Kolesar	2016	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
36	Bell, R. M. and D. F. McCaffrey	2002	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
37	de Chaisemartin, C., X. D'Haultfoeuille, and A. De... (self)	2019	1	1	2.0	0.010	0.406	100%
38			3	2	1.5	0.029	0.159	0%
39			5	1	2.5	0.049	0.149	0%
40			3	1	1.5	0.029	0.126	0%
41	Cao, Y. and S. Chen		1	1	0.5	0.010	0.087	0%
42	Alexander, D. and M. Schnell		1	1	0.5	0.010	0.087	0%
43	Grosfeld, I., E. Madinier, S. O. Sakalli, and E. Z...		1	1	0.5	0.010	0.087	0%
44	Thoresson, A		1	1	0.5	0.010	0.087	0%
45	Dinkelman, T. and V. Ranchhod		1	1	0.5	0.010	0.087	0%
46	Caliendo, M., A. Fedorets, M. Preuss, C. Schröder,...		1	1	0.5	0.010	0.087	0%
47	Bailey, M. J., J. DiNardo, and B. A. Stuart		1	1	0.5	0.010	0.087	0%
48	Derenoncourt, E. and C. Montialoux		1	1	0.5	0.010	0.087	0%
49	Shorack, G. and J. Wellner	1986	1	1	0.5	0.010	0.087	0%
50	van der Vaart, A	2000	1	1	0.5	0.010	0.087	0%
51			1	1	0.5	0.010	0.087	0%
52			1	1	0.5	0.010	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Pierce, J. R. and P. K. Schott

2016

14.0

0.078

0.957

88%

Calonico, S., M. D. Cattaneo, and M. H. Farrell

2018

9.0

0.059

0.941

83%

Imbens, G. and K. Kalyanaraman

2012

6.5

0.039

0.928

100%

Stute, W., W. G. Manteiga, and M. P. Quindimil

1998

6.5

0.039

0.928

100%

Garrett, D. G., E. Ohrn, and J. C. Suárez Serrato

8.5

0.049

0.928

80%

Stute, W

1997

9.5

0.069

0.894

71%

de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille (self)

2020

3.5

0.029

0.843

100%

Calonico, S., M. D. Cattaneo, and R. Titiunik

2014

4.5

0.029

0.843

100%

Li, G., C. Ling, and Z. Tan

2024

6.0

0.029

0.737

100%

de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D’Haultfoeuille (self)

2024

4.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Calonico, S., M. D. Cattaneo, and M. H. Farrell

2019

4.0

0.020

0.644

100%

Callaway, B., A. Goodman-Bacon, and P. H. Sant'Ann...

2024

1.5

0.029

0.585

100%

Dustmann, C., A. Lindner, U. Schönberg, M. Umkehre...

1.5

0.020

0.511

50%

de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille (self)

2018

1.0

0.020

0.511

100%

de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille (self)

2021

1.0

0.020

0.511

50%

Fricke, H

2017

1.0

0.020

0.511

100%

Duggan, M. and F. Scott Morton

2010

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Enikolopov, R., M. Petrova, and E. Zhuravskaya

2011

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

de Chaisemartin, C (self)

2011

1.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Blundell, R. and M. C. Dias

2009

0.5

0.010

0.406

100%

Haxhiu, E. and T. Helgerman

2024

0.5

0.010

0.406

100%

Caetano, C

2015

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Haanwinckel, D

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

de Chaisemartin, C., X. D’Haultfoeuille, F. Pasqui... (self)

2022

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Graham, B. S. and J. L. Powell

2012

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Sasaki, Y. and T. Ura

2021

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

de Chaisemartin, C., D. Ciccia, X. D'Haultfoeuille... (self)

2024b

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

de Chaisemartin, C., D. Ciccia, X. D'Haultfoeuille... (self)

2024a

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

de Chaisemartin, C., D. C. X. D'Haultfœuille, and ... (self)

2024

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Blandhol, C., J. Bonney, M. Mogstad, and A. Torgov...

2022

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Imbens, G. W., D. B. Rubin, and B. I. Sacerdote

2001

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Imbens, G. and Y. Xu

2024

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

de Chaisemartin, C., D. Ciccia, X. D'Haultfoeuille... (self)

2024d

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

de Chaisemartin, C., D. Ciccia, X. D'Haultfoeuille... (self)

2024c

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Imbens, G. W. and M. Kolesar

2016

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

Bell, R. M. and D. F. McCaffrey

2002

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

de Chaisemartin, C., X. D'Haultfoeuille, and A. De... (self)

2019

2.0

0.010

0.406

100%

1.5

0.029

0.159

2.5

0.049

0.149

1.5

0.029

0.126

Cao, Y. and S. Chen

0.5

0.010

0.087

Alexander, D. and M. Schnell

0.5

0.010

0.087

Grosfeld, I., E. Madinier, S. O. Sakalli, and E. Z...

0.5

0.010

0.087

Thoresson, A

0.5

0.010

0.087

Dinkelman, T. and V. Ranchhod

0.5

0.010

0.087

Caliendo, M., A. Fedorets, M. Preuss, C. Schröder,...

0.5

0.010

0.087

Bailey, M. J., J. DiNardo, and B. A. Stuart

0.5

0.010

0.087

Derenoncourt, E. and C. Montialoux

0.5

0.010

0.087

Shorack, G. and J. Wellner

1986

0.5

0.010

0.087

van der Vaart, A

2000

0.5

0.010

0.087

0.5

0.010

0.087

0.5

0.010

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.