← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

2405.03021
Denis Chetverikov
https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.03021
105
Citation mentions
63
Cited references
3
Sections
11,993
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Belloni, Chen, Chernozhukov and Hansen 2012 7 4 14.0 0.067 1.000 100%
2 Zou, Hastie and Tibshirani 2007 5 2 10.0 0.048 0.874 100%
3 Tibshirani and Taylor 2012 4 2 8.0 0.038 0.811 100%
4 Belloni, Chernozhukov, Chetverikov and Kato (self) 2015 3 2 6.0 0.029 0.737 100%
5 Li 1987 3 2 6.0 0.029 0.737 100%
6 Lecue and Mitchell 2012 3 2 6.0 0.029 0.737 100%
7 Belloni and Chernozhukov 2009 3 2 6.0 0.029 0.737 100%
8 Arlot and Celisse 2010 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
9 Wu and Wang 2020 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
10 Bischl et al. 2023 2 2 3.0 0.019 0.644 100%
11 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov and Kengo (self) 2013 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
12 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov and Kengo (self) 2017 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
13 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Kengo and Koike (self) 2022 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
14 Massart 2007 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
15 Belloni and Chernozhukov 2010 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
16 Belloni, Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Hansen, Kato a... (self) 2018 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
17 Kock, Pedersen and Sorensen 2024 2 2 4.0 0.019 0.644 100%
18 Chetverikov and Sorensen (self) 2021 4 1 8.0 0.038 0.644 100%
19 Birge and Massart 2007 3 1 6.0 0.029 0.585 100%
20 Leung and Barron 2006 3 1 6.0 0.029 0.585 100%
21 Spokoiny and Willrich 2019 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
22 Chetverikov and Liao (self) 2021 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
23 Bickel, Ritov and Tsybakov 2009 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
24 Chetverikov, Liao and Chernozhukov (self) 2021 2 1 4.0 0.019 0.511 100%
25 Ding, Tarokh and Yang 2018 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Demirer, Duflo, Hansen,... (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Mallows 1973 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Boucheron, Lugosi and Massart 2013 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Andrews 1991 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Shibata 1981 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Polyak and Tsybakov 1990 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Kneip 1994 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Hansen 2007 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Zhu, Wan, Zhang and Zou 2019 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Zhu, Wang, Zhang and Liang 2023 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Stein 1981 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Meyer and Woodroofe 2000 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Candes, Sing-Long and Trzasko 2013 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Lepski 1990 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Lepski 1991 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Lepski 1992 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Spokoiny and Vial 2009 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 Chen and Christensen 2018 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
44 Chen, Christensen and Kankanala 2021 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
45 Spokoiny, Wang and Hardle 2013 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
46 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov and Kato (self) 2014 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
47 Allen 1974 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
48 Stone 1974 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
49 Geisser 1975 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
50 Wegkamp 2003 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
51 Celisse 2014 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
52 Lei 2020 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
53 Arlot 2019 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
54 Koltchinskii 2011 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
55 Catoni 1997 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
56 Yang 2000 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
57 Yang 2004 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
58 Dalalyan and Tsybakov 2007 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
59 Jing, Shao and Wang 2003 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
60 Dudley 2014 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
61 Chernozhukov, Chetverikov and Kengo (self) 2015 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
62 Bellec and Zhang 2021 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
63 Chiang 2018 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.