Citation Analysis

\textbfQuantifying the Internal Validity of Weighted Estimands
Alexandre Poirier, Tymon Słoczyński
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.14603
89
Citation mentions
37
Cited references
18
Sections
11,305
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 de Chaisemartin and D'Haultfoeuille 2020 5 3 8.5 0.056 1.000 100%
2 Angrist 1998 4 3 5.5 0.045 0.928 100%
3 Goodman-Bacon 2021 10 5 15.5 0.112 0.928 80%
4 Blandhol, Bonney, Mogstad, and Torgovitsky 2022 8 6 9.0 0.090 0.909 75%
5 Angrist and Imbens 1995 4 2 6.5 0.045 0.811 100%
6 S\loczy\'nski 2020 4 2 6.5 0.045 0.811 100%
7 Callaway and Sant'Anna 2021 4 2 8.0 0.045 0.811 100%
8 S\loczy\'nski 2022 3 2 4.5 0.034 0.737 100%
9 Stevenson and Wolfers 2006 3 2 6.0 0.034 0.737 100%
10 Kolesar 2013 2 2 2.5 0.022 0.644 100%
11 Wooldridge 2025 4 1 8.0 0.045 0.644 100%
12 de Chaisemartin 2012 3 1 1.5 0.034 0.585 100%
13 Fang and Santos 2019 7 3 5.0 0.079 0.523 14%
14 Aronow and Samii 2016 2 1 1.0 0.022 0.511 100%
15 Imbens and Angrist 1994 2 1 1.0 0.022 0.511 100%
16 Callaway, Goodman-Bacon, and Sant'Anna 2024 2 1 1.0 0.022 0.511 100%
17 de Chaisemartin 2017 2 1 1.0 0.022 0.511 100%
18 Mogstad and Torgovitsky 2024 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 van 't Hoff, Lewbel, and Mellace 2024 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Chen 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Goldsmith-Pinkham, Hull, and Kolesar 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Humphreys 2025 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Sun and Abraham 2021 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Athey and Imbens 2022 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Caetano and Callaway 2023 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Borusyak, Jaravel, and Spiess 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Hirano, Imbens, and Ridder 2003 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Li, Morgan, and Zaslavsky 2018 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Miller, Shenhav, and Grosz 2023 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Imbens and Rubin 2015 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Andrews, Roth, and Pakes 2023 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
32 Cox and Shi 2023 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
33 Fang, Santos, Shaikh, and Torgovitsky 2023 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
34 Cho and Russell 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
35 Hong and Li 2018 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
36 Chernozhukov, Lee, and Rosen 2013 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
37 Bei 2024 1 1 0.5 0.011 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.