Citation Analysis

Identification and Estimation of Nonseparable Triangular Equations with Mismeasured Instruments
Shaomin Wu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.13735

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

12,687

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Schennach	2004	8	7	14.0	0.143	1.000	100%
2	Schennach	2004	4	4	6.0	0.071	0.928	100%
3	Schennach, White and Chalak	2012	5	2	9.0	0.089	0.874	100%
4	Matzkin	2016	3	3	3.5	0.054	0.737	67%
5	Song, Schennach and White	2015	3	2	4.0	0.054	0.737	100%
6	Imbens and Newey	2009	7	1	7.0	0.125	0.693	100%
7	Chesher	2003	2	2	3.0	0.036	0.644	100%
8	Altonji and Matzkin	2005	2	2	3.0	0.036	0.644	100%
9	Fan and Truong	1993	2	2	3.0	0.036	0.644	100%
10	Matzkin	2003	2	2	4.0	0.036	0.644	100%
11	Politis and Romano	1999	2	2	4.0	0.036	0.644	100%
12	Andrews	1995	4	1	8.0	0.071	0.644	100%
13	Hansen	2008	3	1	6.0	0.054	0.585	100%
14	Brancaccio, Kalouptsidi and Papageorgiou	2020	2	1	2.0	0.036	0.511	100%
15	Shaikh and Vytlacil	2011	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
16	Blundell, Chen and Kristensen	2007	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
17	Aradillas-Lopez	2022	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
18	Fan	1991	1	1	1.0	0.018	0.406	100%
19	Matzkin	2015	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
20	Li	2002	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%
21	Fan	1991	1	1	2.0	0.018	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.