← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Regression Discontinuity Design with Spillovers
Eric Auerbach, Yong Cai, Ahnaf Rafi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06471
124
Citation mentions
57
Cited references
12
Sections
8,298
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Hahn, Todd and Van der Klaauw 2001 7 4 10.0 0.056 1.000 100%
2 Dal Torrione, Arduini and Forastiere 2024 6 3 9.0 0.048 1.000 100%
3 Gonzalez 2021 12 4 20.0 0.097 0.971 92%
4 Armstrong and Kolesar 2020 8 6 9.5 0.065 0.855 62%
5 Bramoulle, Djebbari and Fortin 2009 3 3 5.0 0.024 0.843 100%
6 Hudgens and Halloran 2008 3 3 5.0 0.024 0.843 100%
7 Aronow, Basta and Halloran 2017 4 2 6.0 0.032 0.811 100%
8 Calonico, Cattaneo and Titiunik 2014 7 6 7.0 0.056 0.754 43%
9 Manski 1993 3 2 4.0 0.024 0.737 100%
10 Leung 2022 3 2 4.0 0.024 0.737 100%
11 Wand and Jones 1995 5 5 5.5 0.040 0.737 40%
12 Armstrong and Kolesar 2018 3 3 4.5 0.024 0.737 67%
13 De Giorgi, Pellizzari and Redaelli 2010 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
14 Goldsmith-Pinkham and Imbens 2013 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
15 De Paula, Rasul and Souza 2024 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
16 Cliff and Ord 1973 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
17 Kelejian and Prucha 1998 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
18 Kelejian and Prucha 2010 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
19 Lee 2004 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
20 Lee 2007 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
21 Thistlethwaite and Campbell 1960 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
22 Cattaneo and Titiunik 2022 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
23 Jardim, Long, Plotnick, van Inwegen, Vigdor and We... 2022 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
24 Cattaneo, Frandsen and Titiunik 2015 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
25 Aronow and Samii 2017 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
26 Borusyak and Kolerman-Shemer 2024 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
27 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
28 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
29 Savje, Aronow and Hudgens 2021 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
30 Hu, Li and Wager 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Li and Wager 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 Gao and Ding 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
33 Vazquez-Bare 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Auerbach, Guo and Tabord-Meehan (self) 2025 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Clarke 2017 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Butts 2021 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Xu 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Cao and Dowd 2019 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Sobel 2006 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Vazquez-Bare 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Forastiere, Del Prete and Sciabolazza 2020 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
42 Munro, Wager and Xu 2021 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
43 Li, Johari, Kuang and Wager 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
44 Munro 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
45 Faridani and Niehaus 2024 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
46 Penrose 2003 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
47 Leung 2020 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
48 Auerbach, Cai and Rafi (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
49 Leung 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
50 De Paula, Richards-Shubik and Tamer 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
51 Fisman and Miguel 2007 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
52 Barr and Serra 2010 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
53 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.110 0%
54 Auerbach, Cai and Rafi (self) 2025 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
55 van der Vaart 1998 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
56 van der Vaart and Wellner 2023 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
57 Pollard 1984 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.