Citation Analysis

Context-dependent Causality\\ (the Non-Monotonic Case)
Nir Billfeld, Moshe Kim
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.05021
124
Citation mentions
55
Cited references
16
Sections
4,589
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Blundell, Richard W and Matzkin, Rosa L 2014 4 3 8.0 0.032 0.928 100%
2 Imbens, Guido W and Newey, Whitney K 2009 14 6 19.5 0.113 0.863 64%
3 Pearl, Judea 2019 3 3 5.0 0.024 0.843 100%
4 G. Hanoch 1965 9 2 16.5 0.073 0.840 89%
5 Newey, Whitney K 1994 11 6 13.5 0.089 0.817 55%
6 Goodfellow, Ian and Pouget-Abadie, Jean and Mirza,... 2014 4 2 6.0 0.032 0.811 100%
7 Wei, Xiang and Gong, Boqing and Liu, Zixia and Lu,... 2018 3 2 5.0 0.024 0.737 100%
8 Heckman, James J and Robb, Richard 1985 3 2 6.0 0.024 0.737 100%
9 Ho, Jonathan and Jain, Ajay and Abbeel, Pieter 2020 3 2 6.0 0.024 0.737 100%
10 Hoderlein, Stefan and Mammen, Enno 2009 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
11 Chernozhukov, Victor and Ferna 2020 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
12 Mammen, Enno and Rothe, Christoph and Schienle, Me... 2012 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
13 Chernozhukov, Victor and Ferna 2013 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
14 Susan Athey and Guido Imbens and Jonas Metzger and... 2020 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
15 Gulrajani, Ishaan and Ahmed, Faruk and Arjovsky, M... 2017 2 2 3.0 0.016 0.644 100%
16 Deaton, Angus and Muellbauer, John 1980 3 2 4.5 0.024 0.644 67%
17 K. Sato 1967 3 2 4.5 0.024 0.644 67%
18 Imbens, Guido W and Angrist, Joshua D 1994 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
19 Hoderlein, Stefan and Holzmann, Hajo and Kasy, Max... 2017 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
20 Angrist, Joshua D and Imbens, Guido W and Rubin, D... 1996 2 1 2.0 0.016 0.511 100%
21 Imbens, Guido W 2007 2 1 4.0 0.016 0.511 100%
22 Alamatsaz, MH 1983 4 2 3.5 0.032 0.511 25%
23 Newey, Whitney K and Powell, James L 2003 2 2 2.5 0.016 0.511 50%
24 Singh, Shashank and Uppal, Ananya and Li, Boyue an... 2018 2 1 4.0 0.016 0.511 100%
25 Christensen, Laurits R and Jorgenson, Dale W and L... 1975 2 2 2.5 0.016 0.511 50%
26 Chesher, Andrew 2003 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
27 Altonji, Joseph G and Matzkin, Rosa L 2005 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
28 Heckman, James J and Vytlacil, Edward 2005 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
29 Klein, Tobias J 2010 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
30 Hoderlein, Stefan and Su, Liangjun and White, Halb... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Hoderlein, Stefan and Mammen, Enno 2007 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 Myerson, Roger B 1999 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
33 Chetverikov, Denis 2019 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Agarwal, Sumit and Grigsby, John and Horta\cc 2020 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Kahneman, Daniel and Tversky, Amos 1979 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Aluma Dembo and Shachar Kariv and Matthew Polisson... 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Tversky, Amos and Kahneman, Daniel 1974 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Rosenzweig, Mark R and Wolpin, Kenneth I 2000 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Chernozhukov, Victor and Imbens, Guido W and Newey... 2007 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Kim, Dongwoo (self) 2020 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Heckman, James J and Pinto, Rodrigo 2018 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
42 Athey, Susan and Imbens, Guido 2016 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
43 Farrell, Max H and Liang, Tengyuan and Misra, Sanj... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
44 Mammen, Enno and Rothe, Christoph and Schienle, Me... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
45 Kurt Hornik and Maxwell Stinchcombe and Halbert Wh... 1989 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
46 Bahat, Yuval and Michaeli, Tomer 2020 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
47 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
48 Afriat, Sydney N 1967 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
49 S. M. Schennach 2014 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
50 Darolles, Serge and Fan, Yanqin and Florens, Jean-... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
51 Mathieu Sinn and Ambrish Rawat 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
52 Manole, Tudor and Balakrishnan, Sivaraman and Wass... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
53 4 1 4.0 0.032 0.139 0%
54 Hall, Peter and Morton, Sally C 1993 2 1 1.0 0.016 0.110 0%
55 Carleson, Lennart 1966 1 1 0.5 0.008 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.