Citation Analysis

Stratifying on Treatment Status
Jinyong Hahn, John Ham, Geert Ridder, Shuyang Sheng
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04700
35
Citation mentions
19
Cited references
5
Sections
2,310
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Heckman \harvardand\ Todd 2009 4 3 7.0 0.114 0.928 100%
2 Hausman \harvardand\ Wise 1981 2 2 3.0 0.057 0.644 100%
3 Newey 1994 8 3 5.5 0.229 0.500 12%
4 Hahn \harvardand\ Ridder (self) 2013 6 2 4.5 0.171 0.481 17%
5 Domencich \harvardand\ McFadden 1975 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
6 Ridder \harvardand\ Moffitt 2007 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
7 Azoulay, Zivin \harvardand\ Wang 2010 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
8 Ham \harvardand\ Khan 2023 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
9 Manski \harvardand\ Lerman 1977 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
10 Manski \harvardand\ McFadden 1981 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
11 Correa, Tian \harvardand\ Bareinboim 2019 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
12 Nabi, Bhattacharya \harvardand\ Shpitser 2020 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
13 Hu \harvardand\ Qin 2018 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
14 Zhang, Hu \harvardand\ Liu 2019 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
15 Song \harvardand\ Yu 2022 1 1 1.0 0.029 0.406 100%
16 Nevo 2003 1 1 2.0 0.029 0.406 100%
17 Hahn (self) 1998 1 1 2.0 0.029 0.406 100%
18 Angrist, Imbens \harvardand\ Rubin 1996 1 1 2.0 0.029 0.406 100%
19 Fr\"olich 2007 1 1 2.0 0.029 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.