← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Seemingly unrelated Bayesian additive regression trees for cost-effectiveness analyses in healthcare
Jonas Esser, Mateus Maia, Andrew C. Parnell, Judith Bosmans, Hanneke van Dongen, Thomas Klausch, Keefe Murphy
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02228
157
Citation mentions
72
Cited references
8
Sections
11,924
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Wiertsema, Suzanne H and Van Dongen, Johanna M and... (self) 2019 13 5 24.0 0.083 1.000 100%
2 Vincent Dorie and Jennifer L Hill and Uri Shalit a... 2019 5 3 8.0 0.032 1.000 100%
3 Chipman, Hugh A and George, Edward I and McCulloch... 2010 17 8 32.0 0.108 1.000 100%
4 Um, Seungha and Linero, Antonio R and Sinha, Debaj... 2023 5 4 9.0 0.032 1.000 100%
5 Hahn, P Richard and Murray, Jared S and Carvalho, ... 2020 8 5 14.0 0.051 1.000 100%
6 Gabrio, A and Baio, G and Manca, A 2019 5 5 10.0 0.032 1.000 100%
7 Li, Fan and Ding, Peng and Mealli, Fabrizia 2023 5 4 10.0 0.032 1.000 100%
8 Kapelner, Adam and Bleich, Justin 2016 4 3 8.0 0.025 0.928 100%
9 Huang, Alan and Wand, Matthew P 2013 4 3 8.0 0.025 0.928 100%
10 Zhang, Xiao and Boscardin, W John and Belin, Thoma... 2006 4 4 8.0 0.025 0.928 100%
11 McJames, Nathan and O'Shea, Ann and Goh, Yong Chen... (self) 2024 3 3 5.0 0.019 0.843 100%
12 Lo 2000 3 3 6.0 0.019 0.843 100%
13 Chib, Siddhartha and Greenberg, Edward 1998 4 2 8.0 0.025 0.811 100%
14 Rudolph, Kara E and Williams, Nicholas T and Miles... 2023 3 2 4.0 0.019 0.737 100%
15 Zellner, Arnold 1962 3 2 4.0 0.019 0.737 100%
16 Willan, Andrew R and Briggs, Andrew H and Hoch, Je... 2004 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
17 Linero, Antonio R and Yang, Yun 2018 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
18 Rockova 2020 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
19 Rockova 2020 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
20 Hill, Jennifer L 2011 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
21 Hastie, Trevor J and Tibshirani, Robert 2000 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
22 Tan, Yaoyuan Vincent and Roy, Jason 2019 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
23 Barnard, John and McCulloch, Robert E and Meng, Xi... 2000 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
24 Zhang, Xiao 2020 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
25 Linero, Antonio R 2018 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
26 M. F. Drummond and M. J. Sculpher and K. Claxton a... 2015 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
27 Chakraborty, S 2016 2 1 2.0 0.013 0.511 100%
28 Andrew Gelman 2006 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
29 Pratola, Matthew T and Chipman, Hugh A and George,... 2020 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
30 Baio, Gianluca 2012 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
31 El Alili, Mohamed and van Dongen, Johanna M and Es... (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Chipman, Hugh A and George, Edward I and McCulloch... 1998 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Friedman, Jerome H 2001 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Janizadeh, Saeid and Vafakhah, Mehdi and Kapelan, ... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Sarti, Danilo A and Prado, Estev\ a 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Yee, Ryan and Deshpande, Sameer K 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Florian Huber and Luca Rossini 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Peruzzi, Michele and Dunson, David B 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Clark, Todd E and Huber, Florian and Koop, Gary an... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Rossi, Peter E and Allenby, Greg M and McCulloch, ... 2005 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Hernán, M A and Robins, J M 2024 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Imbens, Guido W. and Rubin, Donald B. 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Lamers, Leida M and McDonnell, Joseph and Stalmeie... 2006 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Vink, Gerko and Frank, Laurence E and Pannekoek, J... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Van Buuren, Stef and Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Karin 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Greenberg, Edward 2012 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Friedman, Jerome H and Robert Tibshirani and Hasti... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Alvarez, Ignacio and Niemi, Jarad and Simpson, Mat... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Giannone, Domenico and Lenza, Michele and Primicer... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Bierens, Herman J 2004 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Robert, Christian P 1995 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Tilmann Gneiting and Adrian E Raftery 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Vincent Dorie and Hugh A Chipman and Robert E McCu... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Ethan Alt 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Zellner, Arnold and Ando, Tomohiro 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Stan Development Team 2024 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 Stan Development Team 2024 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 Friedman, Jerome H 1991 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Breiman, Leo 1996 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Breiman, Leo and Friedman, Jerome H and Olshen, R.... 1984 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Glick, Henry A and Doshi, Jalpa A and Sonnad, Seem... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Dakin, Helen and Gray, Alastair and Fitzpatrick, R... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Prado, Estev\ a 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 Maia, Mateus and Murphy, Keefe and Parnell, Andrew... (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Zeldow, Bret and Lo Re 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 Sameer K. Deshpande and Ray Bai and Cecilia Balocc... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Prado, Estev\ a 2024$+$ 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 Afolayan, R B and Adeleke, B L 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Papageorgiou, Georgios and Richardson, Sylvia T an... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 Xiao Zhang and W. John Boscardin and Thomas R. Bel... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
71 Tony Pourmohamad and Herbert K. H. Lee 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
72 Kindo, Bereket P and Wang, Hao and Pen 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.