Citation Analysis

Policy Learning for Optimal Dynamic Treatment Regimes with Observational Data
Shosei Sakaguchi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.00221
152
Citation mentions
66
Cited references
18
Sections
13,654
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Baqun Zhang and Anastasios A. Tsiatis and Eric B. ... 2013 6 4 9.0 0.039 1.000 100%
2 Sakaguchi, Shosei (self) 2025 7 5 11.0 0.046 0.950 86%
3 Kallus, Nathan and Uehara, Masatoshi 2020 4 3 6.5 0.026 0.928 100%
4 Athey, Susan and Wager, Stefan 2021 10 6 10.5 0.066 0.888 70%
5 Zhou, Zhengyuan and Athey, Susan and Wager, Stefan 2023 21 9 26.5 0.138 0.874 67%
6 Robins, J. M. 1986 3 3 5.0 0.020 0.843 100%
7 Robins, J. M. 1997 3 3 5.0 0.020 0.843 100%
8 Zhang, Y. and E. B. Laber and M. Davidian and A. A... 2018 3 3 4.5 0.020 0.843 100%
9 Krueger, Alan B 1999 4 2 6.0 0.026 0.811 100%
10 Zhang, Baqun and Zhang, Min 2018 4 2 6.5 0.026 0.811 100%
11 Ding, Weili and Lehrer, Steven F 2010 3 2 5.0 0.020 0.737 100%
12 Li, Zhen and Chen, Jie and Laber, Eric and Liu, Fa... 2023 3 2 4.5 0.020 0.737 100%
13 Murphy, S. A. 2005 3 2 3.0 0.020 0.737 100%
14 Murphy, S. A. 2003 3 2 6.0 0.020 0.737 100%
15 Athey, Susan and Tibshirani, Julie and Wager, Stef... 2019 3 3 4.5 0.020 0.737 67%
16 Munos, Re 2008 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
17 Fonteneau, Raphael and Murphy, Susan A and Wehenke... 2013 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
18 Le, Hoang and Voloshin, Cameron and Yue, Yisong 2019 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
19 Zhao, Yingqi and Zeng, Donglin and Rush, A John an... 2012 2 2 1.5 0.013 0.644 100%
20 Kitagawa, T. and A. Tetenov 2018 2 2 1.5 0.013 0.644 100%
21 Meyer, B. D. 1995 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
22 Kolsrud, J. and C. Landais and P. Nilsson and J. S... 2018 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
23 Zhao, Y. Q. and D. Zeng and E. B. Laber and M. R. ... 2015 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
24 Nie, Xinkun and Brunskill, Emma and Wager, Stefan 2021 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
25 Jiang, Nan and Li, Lihong 2016 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
26 Thomas, Philip and Brunskill, Emma 2016 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
27 Tsiatis, Anastasios A and Davidian, Marie and Holl... 2019 6 2 6.0 0.039 0.606 33%
28 Stoye, J. 2009 2 1 1.0 0.013 0.511 100%
29 Wallace, Michael P and Moodie, Erica EM 2015 2 1 1.0 0.013 0.511 100%
30 Ertefaie, Ashkan and McKay, James R and Oslin, Dav... 2021 2 1 1.0 0.013 0.511 100%
31 Word, E and J. Johnston and H. P. Bain and B. D. F... 1990 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
32 Lechner, M. 2009 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
33 Rodr\'\i 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
34 Wang, Lu and Rotnitzky, Andrea and Lin, Xihong and... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
35 Pelham Jr, William E and Fabiano, Gregory A and Wa... 2016 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
36 Liu, Xiao 2023 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
37 Chernozhukov, Victor and Chetverikov, Denis and De... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Manski, C. F. 2004 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
39 Hirano, K. and J. Porter 2009 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
40 Stoye, J. 2012 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
41 Qian, Min and Murphy, Susan A 2011 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Bhattacharya, D. and P. Dupas 2012 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
43 Tetenov, A. 2012 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Mbakop, Eric and Tabord-Meehan, Max 2021 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
45 Kitagawa, Toru and Sakaguchi, Shosei and Tetenov, ... (self) 2023 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
46 Viviano, Davide 2025 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
47 Chakraborty, B. and S. A. Murphy 2014 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
48 Laber, E. B. and D. J. Lizotte and M. Qian and W. ... 2014 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
49 Kosorok, Michael R and Laber, Eric B 2019 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
50 Watkins, Christopher JCH and Dayan, Peter 1992 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
51 Moodie, E.M. and B. Chakraborty and M. S. Kramer 2012 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
52 Shayan Doroudi and Philip S. Thomas and Emma Bruns... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
53 Robins, J. M. 2004 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
54 Heckman, J. J. and S. Navarro 2007 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
55 Heckman, J. J. and J. E. Humphries and G. Veramend... 2016 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
56 Han, Sukjin 2023 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
57 Ida, Takanori and Ishihara, Takunori and Ito, Koic... (self) 2024 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.406 100%
58 Herna 2001 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
59 Laber, Eric B and Zhao, Ying-Qi 2015 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
60 Tao, Yebin and Wang, Lu and Almirall, Daniel 2018 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
61 Yilun Sun and Lu Wang 2021 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
62 Blumlein, Theresa and Persson, Joel and Feuerriege... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
63 Zhou, Nina and Wang, Lu and Almirall, Daniel 2023 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
64 Breiman, L. and Friedman, J. and Stone, C.J. and O... 1984 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
65 Ahmad, Muhammad Aurangzeb and Eckert, Carly and Te... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
66 Lugosi, G. 2002 2 2 1.0 0.013 0.139 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.