← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Sequential Synthetic Difference in Differences
Dmitry Arkhangelsky, Aleksei Samkov
https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.00164
73
Citation mentions
47
Cited references
8
Sections
8,038
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Borusyak, K., X. Jaravel, and J. Spiess 2024 5 4 8.0 0.068 1.000 100%
2 Arkhangelsky, D., S. Athey, D. A. Hirshberg, G. W.... (self) 2021 7 4 10.0 0.096 1.000 100%
3 Bai, J 2009 3 3 5.0 0.041 0.843 100%
4 Bailey, M. J. and A. Goodman-Bacon 2015 3 3 5.0 0.041 0.843 100%
5 Bertrand, M., E. Duflo, and S. Mullainathan 2004 4 2 5.0 0.055 0.811 100%
6 Pesaran, M. H 2006 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
7 Chamberlain, G 1984 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
8 Callaway, B. and P. H. Sant’Anna 2020 2 2 3.0 0.027 0.644 100%
9 Abadie, A 2005b 2 2 4.0 0.027 0.644 100%
10 Sant’Anna, P. H. and J. Zhao 2020 2 2 4.0 0.027 0.644 100%
11 Card, D. and A. Krueger 1994 2 1 2.0 0.027 0.511 100%
12 Abadie, A., A. Diamond, and J. Hainmueller 2010 2 1 2.0 0.027 0.511 100%
13 Ben-Michael, E., A. Feller, and J. Rothstein 2022 2 1 2.0 0.027 0.511 100%
14 Chamberlain, G. and G. W. Imbens 2003 2 2 2.5 0.027 0.511 50%
15 Currie, J., H. Kleven, and E. Zwiers 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
16 Goldsmith-Pinkham, P 2024 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
17 Angrist, J. D. and J.-S. Pischke 2008 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
18 Card, D 1990 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
19 Callaway, B. and P. H. Sant'Anna 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
20 De Chaisemartin, C. and X. d'Haultfoeuille 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
21 Sun, L. and S. Abraham 2020 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
22 Abadie, A. and J. Gardeazabal 2003 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
23 Arellano, M. and S. Bonhomme 2011 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
24 Chamberlain, G 1992 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
25 Freyberger, J 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
26 Holtz-Eakin, D., W. Newey, and H. S. Rosen 1988 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
27 Ben-Michael, E., A. Feller, and J. Rothstein 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
28 Ferman, B. and C. Pinto 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
29 Ferman, B. and C. Pinto 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
30 Hirshberg, D. A 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
31 Cattaneo, M. D., Y. Feng, and R. Titiunik 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
32 Chen, J 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
33 Abadie, A 2005a 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
34 Gabaix, X 2011 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
35 Neyman, J 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
36 Rubin, D. B 1974 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
37 Imbens, G. W. and D. B. Rubin 2015 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
38 Arkhangelsky, D. and G. Imbens (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
39 Ghanem, D., P. H. Sant'Anna, and K. Wuthrich 2022 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
40 Adao, R., M. Kolesar, and E. Morales 2019 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
41 Rubin, D. B. et al 1981 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
42 Hahn, J. and Z. Liao 2021 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
43 Callaway, B., A. Goodman-Bacon, and P. H. Sant'Ann... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
44 Aguilar, J 2023 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
45 Armstrong, T. B., M. Weidner, and A. Zeleneev 2022 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
46 De Chaisemartin, C. and X. D’haultfoeuille 2023 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
47 Athey, S., M. Bayati, N. Doudchenko, G. Imbens, an... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.