← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Distributional Treatment Effect with Latent Rank Invariance
Myungkou Shin
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.18503
72
Citation mentions
37
Cited references
9
Sections
6,042
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Jones, Molitor and Reif 2019 13 4 24.0 0.181 1.000 100%
2 Hu and Schennach 2008 10 4 9.5 0.139 0.794 50%
3 Carneiro, Hansen and Heckman 2003 3 2 5.0 0.042 0.737 100%
4 Henry, Kitamura and Salanie 2014 3 2 4.0 0.042 0.737 100%
5 Cunha, Heckman and Schennach 2010 5 1 10.0 0.069 0.693 100%
6 Fan and Park 2010 2 2 3.0 0.028 0.644 100%
7 Miao, Geng and Tchetgen Tchetgen 2018 2 1 2.0 0.028 0.511 100%
8 Deaner 2023 2 1 2.0 0.028 0.511 100%
9 Kedagni 2023 2 1 2.0 0.028 0.511 100%
10 Nagasawa 2022 2 1 2.0 0.028 0.511 100%
11 Hu 2008 2 2 1.5 0.028 0.511 50%
12 Firpo and Pinto 2016 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
13 Fan, Sherman and Shum 2014 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
14 Firpo and Ridder 2019 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
15 Frandsen and Lefgren 2021 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
16 Heckman, Smith and Clements 1997 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
17 Wu and Perloff 2006 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
18 Noh 2023 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
19 Bedoya, Bittarello, Davis and Mittag 2018 1 1 1.0 0.014 0.406 100%
20 Chernozhukov and Hansen 2005 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
21 Chernozhukov and Hansen 2006 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
22 Athey and Imbens 2006 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
23 Vuong and Xu 2017 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
24 Callaway and Li 2019 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
25 Han and Xu 2023 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
26 Kasahara and Shimotsu 2009 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
27 Arcidiacono and Miller 2011 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
28 Hu and Shum 2012 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
29 Hu and Sasaki 2018 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
30 Cunha and Heckman 2008 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
31 Bonhomme, Lamadon and Manresa 2022 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
32 Grossman 1972 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
33 Wagstaff 1993 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
34 Jacobson 2000 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
35 Yogo 2016 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
36 Makarov 1982 1 1 2.0 0.014 0.406 100%
37 Hong and Pan 1992 1 1 0.5 0.014 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.