Citation Analysis – \textbf\Large Tests for almost stochastic dominance

\textbf\Large Tests for almost stochastic dominance
Amparo Baíllo, Javier Cárcamo, Carlos Mora-Corral
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.15258

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

12,802

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Huang, Y.--C., Kan, K., Tzeng, L. Y., and Wang, K....	2021	5	4	10.0	0.076	1.000	100%
2	Fang, Z., and Santos, A	2019	5	3	10.0	0.076	1.000	100%
3	Sun, Z., and Beare, B. K	2021	4	3	8.0	0.061	0.928	100%
4	Levy, H	2012	3	3	6.0	0.045	0.843	100%
5	Linton, O., Song, K. and Whang, Y. J	2010	3	3	6.0	0.045	0.843	100%
6	Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. G	2006	3	2	6.0	0.045	0.737	100%
7	Leshno, M., and Levy, H	2002	3	2	6.0	0.045	0.737	100%
8	Baillo, A., C\'arcamo, J. and Mora-Corral, C (self)	2022	3	2	6.0	0.045	0.737	100%
9	Levy, H	2016	2	2	4.0	0.030	0.644	100%
10	Barrett, G. F., Donald, S. G., and Bhattacharya, D	2014	2	2	4.0	0.030	0.644	100%
11	C\'arcamo, J	2017	2	2	4.0	0.030	0.644	100%
12	Tsetlin, I., Winkler, R. L., Huang, R. J., and Shi...	2015	3	1	6.0	0.045	0.585	100%
13	Zheng, B	2018	2	1	4.0	0.030	0.511	100%
14	Arnold, B. C., and Sarabia, J. M	2018	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
15	M\"uller, A	1997	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
16	Fishburn, P. C	1984	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
17	Anderson, G	1996	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
18	Barrett, G. F., and Donald, S. G	2003	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
19	Zheng, B	2002	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
20	Berrendero, J. R., and C\'arcamo, J	2011	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
21	Ermakov, M	2017	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
22			1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
23	Muliere, P., and Scarsini, M	1989	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
24	de la Cal, J., and C\'arcamo, J	2010	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
25	Tzeng, L. Y., Huang, R. J., and Shih, P.-T	2013	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
26	Chang, J. R., Liu, W. H., and Hung, M. W	2019	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
27	Villani, C	2009	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
28	Rachev, S. T., Klebanov, L., Stoyanov, S. V., and ...	2013	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
29	Beare, B. K	2010	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
30	Shapiro, A	1991	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
31	Grafakos, L	2008	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
32			1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
33	Kaji, T	2018	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
34	Bali, T. G., Demirtas, K. O., Levy, H. and Wolf, A	2009	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
35	Bickel, P. J., Ritov, A. J., and Wellner, J. A	1993	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
36			1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
37	Gin\'e, E., and Zinn, J	1990	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
38	Sablica, L., and Hornik, K	2020	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
39	Maasoumi, E. and Wang, L	2019	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Huang, Y.--C., Kan, K., Tzeng, L. Y., and Wang, K....

2021

10.0

0.076

1.000

100%

Fang, Z., and Santos, A

2019

10.0

0.076

1.000

100%

Sun, Z., and Beare, B. K

2021

8.0

0.061

0.928

100%

Levy, H

2012

6.0

0.045

0.843

100%

Linton, O., Song, K. and Whang, Y. J

2010

6.0

0.045

0.843

100%

Shaked, M. and Shanthikumar, J. G

2006

6.0

0.045

0.737

100%

Leshno, M., and Levy, H

2002

6.0

0.045

0.737

100%

Baillo, A., C\'arcamo, J. and Mora-Corral, C (self)

2022

6.0

0.045

0.737

100%

Levy, H

2016

4.0

0.030

0.644

100%

Barrett, G. F., Donald, S. G., and Bhattacharya, D

2014

4.0

0.030

0.644

100%

C\'arcamo, J

2017

4.0

0.030

0.644

100%

Tsetlin, I., Winkler, R. L., Huang, R. J., and Shi...

2015

6.0

0.045

0.585

100%

Zheng, B

2018

4.0

0.030

0.511

100%

Arnold, B. C., and Sarabia, J. M

2018

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

M\"uller, A

1997

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Fishburn, P. C

1984

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Anderson, G

1996

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Barrett, G. F., and Donald, S. G

2003

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Zheng, B

2002

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Berrendero, J. R., and C\'arcamo, J

2011

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Ermakov, M

2017

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Muliere, P., and Scarsini, M

1989

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

de la Cal, J., and C\'arcamo, J

2010

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Tzeng, L. Y., Huang, R. J., and Shih, P.-T

2013

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Chang, J. R., Liu, W. H., and Hung, M. W

2019

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Villani, C

2009

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Rachev, S. T., Klebanov, L., Stoyanov, S. V., and ...

2013

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Beare, B. K

2010

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Shapiro, A

1991

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Grafakos, L

2008

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Kaji, T

2018

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Bali, T. G., Demirtas, K. O., Levy, H. and Wolf, A

2009

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Bickel, P. J., Ritov, A. J., and Wellner, J. A

1993

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Gin\'e, E., and Zinn, J

1990

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Sablica, L., and Hornik, K

2020

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Maasoumi, E. and Wang, L

2019

2.0

0.015

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.