Citation Analysis

Imputation of Counterfactual Outcomes when the Errors are Predictable
Silvia Goncalves, Serena Ng
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.08130
44
Citation mentions
31
Cited references
8
Sections
7,865
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Goldberger 1962 5 4 7.0 0.114 0.928 80%
2 Chernozhukov, Wüthrich, and Zhu 2021 3 3 5.0 0.068 0.843 100%
3 Fan, Masini, and Medeiros 2022 3 3 5.0 0.068 0.843 100%
4 Bai and Ng 2021 4 2 8.0 0.091 0.811 100%
5 Arkhangelsky, Athey, Hirshberg, Imbens, and Wager 2021 2 1 4.0 0.045 0.511 100%
6 Ferman and Pinto 2021 2 1 4.0 0.045 0.511 100%
7 Ferman 2023 1 1 1.0 0.023 0.406 100%
8 Xu 2017 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
9 Athey, Bayati, Doudchenko, Imbens, and Khosravi 2021 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
10 Abadie and Gardeazabal 2003 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
11 Abadie, Diamond, and Hainmueller 2010 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
12 Ben-Michael, Feller, and Rothstein 2021 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
13 Henderson 1950 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
14 Robinson 1991 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
15 Spall 1991 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
16 Taub 1979 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
17 Baltagi 2008 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
18 Baltagi 2013 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
19 Cochrane and Orcutt 1949 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
20 Kunitomo and Yamamoto 1985 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
21 Little and Rubin 2019 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
22 Chow and Lin 1971 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
23 Ng and Scanlan 2024 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
24 Brodersen, Gallusser, Koehler, Remy, and Scott 2015 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
25 Carvalho, Masini, and Medeiros 2018 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
26 Masini and Medeiros 2021 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
27 Masini and Medeiros 2022 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
28 Li 2020 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
29 Cattaneo, Feng, and Titiunik 2021 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
30 Phillips 1979 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
31 Li, Shen, and Zhou 2023 1 1 2.0 0.023 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.