Citation Analysis

Estimating Causal Effects of Discrete and Continuous Treatments with Binary Instruments
Victor Chernozhukov, Iván Fernández-Val, Sukjin Han, Kaspar Wüthrich
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.05850
159
Citation mentions
73
Cited references
14
Sections
8,940
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Chernozhukov, V. and C. Hansen (self) 2005 10 5 15.0 0.063 1.000 100%
2 Imbens, G. W. and J. D. Angrist 1994 7 5 10.5 0.044 1.000 100%
3 Imbens, G. W. and W. K. Newey 2009 9 4 13.0 0.057 1.000 100%
4 Han, S. and E. J. Vytlacil (self) 2017 8 4 10.0 0.050 1.000 100%
5 Chernozhukov, V., I. Fernandez-Val, and S. Luo (self) 9 7 13.5 0.057 1.000 100%
6 Chernozhukov, V., I. Fernandez-Val, and B. Melly (self) 2013 5 3 10.0 0.031 1.000 100%
7 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 7 2 12.0 0.044 0.874 100%
8 Heckman, J. J. and E. J. Vytlacil 2007 5 2 10.0 0.031 0.874 100%
9 Torgovitsky, A. 2010 10 2 20.0 0.063 0.874 100%
10 Vytlacil, E. 2002 3 3 6.0 0.019 0.843 100%
11 Gale, D. and H. Nikaido 1965 3 3 6.0 0.019 0.843 100%
12 Newey, W. K. and J. L. Powell 2003 3 2 2.5 0.019 0.737 100%
13 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2015 3 2 4.5 0.019 0.737 100%
14 Anjos, U. U. d. and N. Kolev 2005 3 2 6.0 0.019 0.737 100%
15 Ambrosetti, A. and G. Prodi 1995 3 2 6.0 0.019 0.737 100%
16 Chernozhukov, V., I. Fernandez-Val, B. Melly, and ... (self) 3 2 6.0 0.019 0.737 100%
17 Vuong, Q. and H. Xu 2017 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
18 Newey, W. and S. Stouli 2021 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.644 100%
19 De Paula, A., I. Rasul, and P. Souza 2019 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
20 Wuthrich, K. 2020 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
21 Hadamard, J. 1906 2 2 4.0 0.013 0.644 100%
22 Arellano, M. and S. Bonhomme 2017 2 1 1.0 0.013 0.511 100%
23 Athey, S. and G. W. Imbens 2006 2 1 1.0 0.013 0.511 100%
24 Brinch, C. N., M. Mogstad, and M. Wiswall 2017 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
25 Kowalski, A. E. 2023 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
26 Dong, Y. and Y.-Y. Lee 2023 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
27 van der Vaart, A. W. and J. A. Wellner 1996 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
28 Black, S. E. and P. J. Devereux 2011 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
29 Angrist, J. D. and G. W. Imbens 1995 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
30 Chay, K. and M. Greenstone 2005 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
31 Angrist, J. D., K. Graddy, and G. W. Imbens 2000 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Blundell, R., X. Chen, and D. Kristensen 2007 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Ai, C. and X. Chen 2003 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Chen, X. and D. Pouzo 2009 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
35 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2012 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
36 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2015 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
37 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2013 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Heckman, J. J. and E. Vytlacil 2005 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Abadie, A., J. Angrist, and G. Imbens 2002 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Carneiro, P. and S. Lee 2009 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
41 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2006 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Newey, W. K., J. L. Powell, and F. Vella 1999 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Chesher, A. 2003 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
44 D'Haultfoeuille, X. and P. Fevrier 2015 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
45 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2017 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Manski, C. F. 1990 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Balke, A. and J. Pearl 1997 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Chesher, A. and A. M. Rosen 2020 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Chen, X., Y. Fan, and V. Tsyrennikov 2006 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
50 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Chen, X. and Y. Fan 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Beare, B. K. 2010 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Chen, X., Z. Huang, and Y. Yi 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Chen, X., Z. Xiao, and B. Wang 2022 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Fan, Y., F. Han, and H. Park (self) 2023 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Han, S. and S. Lee (self) 2019 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
57 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2023 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
58 Mourifie, I. and Y. Wan 2021 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Ghanem, D., D. Kedagni, and I. Mourifie 2023 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Hirano, K. and G. W. Imbens 2004 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Kolev, N., U. d. Anjos, and B. V. d. M. Mendes 2006 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Liu, H., J. Lafferty, and L. Wasserman 2009 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Cunha, F., J. J. Heckman, and S. Navarro 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 De Chaisemartin, C. 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Heckman, J., J. L. Tobias, and E. Vytlacil 2003 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 Angrist, J. D. and I. Fernandez-Val 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Mogstad, M., A. Santos, and A. Torgovitsky 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 Han, S. and S. Yang (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Heckman, J. J. 1979 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 Heckman, J. J. and B. E. Honore 1990 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
71 Eisenhauer, P., J. J. Heckman, and E. Vytlacil 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
72 R Core Team 2024 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
73 Bessone, P., G. Rao, F. Schilbach, H. Schofield, a... 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.