Citation Analysis

2403.04236
Zihao Li, Hui Lan, Vasilis Syrgkanis, Mengdi Wang, Masatoshi Uehara
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.04236
208
Citation mentions
89
Cited references
21
Sections
9,252
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Dikkala, Nishanth and Lewis, Greg and Mackey, Lest... (self) 2020 6 3 6.0 0.029 1.000 100%
2 Hartford, Jason and Lewis, Greg and Leyton-Brown, ... 2017 12 4 17.0 0.058 1.000 100%
3 Singh, Rahul and Sahani, Maneesh and Gretton, Arth... 2019 6 4 8.0 0.029 1.000 100%
4 Xu, Liyuan and Kanagawa, Heishiro and Gretton, Art... 2021 10 4 12.5 0.048 1.000 100%
5 Andrew Bennett and Nathan Kallus and Xiaojie Mao a... (self) 2023 8 5 11.5 0.038 1.000 100%
6 Cui, Yifan and Pu, Hongming and Shi, Xu and Miao, ... (self) 2020 7 4 10.5 0.034 0.950 86%
7 Greg Lewis and Vasilis Syrgkanis (self) 2018 4 3 5.0 0.019 0.928 100%
8 Andrew Bennett and Nathan Kallus and Xiaojie Mao a... (self) 2023 14 7 17.0 0.067 0.923 79%
9 Kallus, Nathan and Mao, Xiaojie and Uehara, Masato... (self) 2021 6 3 7.0 0.029 0.874 67%
10 Liao, Luofeng and Chen, You-Lin and Yang, Zhuoran ... (self) 2020 5 2 4.0 0.024 0.874 100%
11 Liao, Luofeng and Fu, Zuyue and Yang, Zhuoran and ... (self) 2021 3 3 5.0 0.014 0.843 100%
12 Dikkala, Nishanth and Lewis, Greg and Mackey, Lest... (self) 2020 3 3 5.0 0.014 0.843 100%
13 Cavalier, Laurent 2011 3 3 6.0 0.014 0.843 100%
14 Zhang, Rui and Imaizumi, Masaaki and Scho 2023 4 2 3.5 0.019 0.811 100%
15 Deaner, Ben 2018 3 2 5.0 0.014 0.737 100%
16 Lin, Tianyi and Jin, Chi and Jordan, Michael I 2020 3 2 5.0 0.014 0.737 100%
17 Jin, Chi and Netrapalli, Praneeth and Jordan, Mich... 2020 3 2 5.0 0.014 0.737 100%
18 Lin, Tianyi and Jin, Chi and Jordan, Michael 2020 3 2 5.0 0.014 0.737 100%
19 Diakonikolas, Jelena and Daskalakis, Constantinos ... 2021 3 2 5.0 0.014 0.737 100%
20 Razaviyayn, Meisam and Huang, Tianjian and Lu, Son... 2020 3 2 5.0 0.014 0.737 100%
21 Wainwright, Martin J 2019 10 4 11.0 0.048 0.737 40%
22 Miao, Wang and Shi, Xu and Tchetgen, Eric Tchetgen (self) 2018 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
23 Andrew Bennett and Nathan Kallus 2020 2 2 1.5 0.010 0.644 100%
24 Florens, Jean-Pierre and Johannes, Jan and Van Bel... 2011 2 2 1.5 0.010 0.644 100%
25 Bartlett, Peter L and Boucheron, Ste 2002 2 2 1.5 0.010 0.644 100%
26 Gold, Carl and Sollich, Peter 2003 2 2 1.5 0.010 0.644 100%
27 McAllester, David A 2003 2 2 1.5 0.010 0.644 100%
28 Ito, Kazufumi and Jin, Bangti 2014 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
29 Hong, Mingyi and Wai, Hoi-To and Wang, Zhaoran and... (self) 2023 2 2 2.5 0.010 0.644 100%
30 Bartlett, Peter L and Bousquet, Olivier and Mendel... 2002 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
31 Newey, Whitney K and Powell, James L 2003 3 1 3.0 0.014 0.585 100%
32 Mendelson, Shahar and Neeman, Joseph 2010 3 3 3.0 0.014 0.585 33%
33 Nathan Kallus and Xiaojie Mao and Masatoshi Uehara (self) 2022 2 1 2.0 0.010 0.511 100%
34 Chen, Xiangyi and Liu, Sijia and Sun, Ruoyu and Ho... 2018 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
35 Barakat, Anas and Bianchi, Pascal 2021 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
36 Minshuo Chen and Haoming Jiang and Wenjing Liao an... 2022 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
37 Birge 2006 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
38 Cohen, Serge and Pennec, Erwan Le 2011 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
39 Angrist, Joshua and Imbens, Guido 1995 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
40 Wang, Sheng and Shao, Jun and Kim, Jae Kwang (self) 2014 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
41 Kalouptsidi, Myrto and Scott, Paul T and Souza-Rod... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
42 Uehara, Masatoshi and Kiyohara, Haruka and Bennett... (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
43 Uehara, Masatoshi and Sekhari, Ayush and Lee, Jaso... (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
44 Shi, Chengchun and Uehara, Masatoshi and Huang, Ji... (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
45 Wang, Lingxiao and Yang, Zhuoran and Wang, Zhaoran (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
46 Yu, Mengxin and Yang, Zhuoran and Fan, Jianqing 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
47 Chernozhukov, Victor and Newey, Whitney and Semeno... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
48 Singh, Rahul 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
49 Kato, Masahiro and Imaizumi, Masaaki and McAlinn, ... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
50 Andrews, Donald and Stock, James H 2005 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
51 Andrews, Isaiah and Stock, James H and Sun, Liyang 2019 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
52 Guyon, Isabelle and Saffari, Amir and Dror, Gideon... 2010 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
53 Cawley, Gavin C and Talbot, Nicola LC 2010 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
54 Raschka, Sebastian 2018 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
55 Emmert-Streib, Frank and Dehmer, Matthias 2019 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
56 Ai, Chunrong and Chen, Xiaohong 2003 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
57 Chen, Qihui 2021 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
58 Chen, Xiaohong and Pouzo, Demian 2012 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
59 Darolles, Serge and Fan, Yanqin and Florens, Jean-... 2011 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
60 Hall, Peter and Horowitz, Joel L 2005 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
61 Horowitz, Joel L 2007 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
62 Liao, Peng and Qi, Zhengling and Murphy, Susan 2020 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
63 Khanduri, Prashant and Zeng, Siliang and Hong, Min... (self) 2021 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
64 Guo, Zhishuai and Hu, Quanqi and Zhang, Lijun and ... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
65 Chunrong Ai and Xiaohong Chen 2007 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
66 Du, Simon Shaolei 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
67 Zaheer, Manzil and Reddi, Sashank and Sachan, Deve... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
68 Wu, Xiaoxia and Du, Simon S and Ward, Rachel 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
69 Zhou, Dongruo and Chen, Jinghui and Cao, Yuan and ... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
70 Ward, Rachel and Wu, Xiaoxia and Bottou, Leon 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
71 Chi Jin and Praneeth Netrapalli and Rong Ge and Sh... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
72 Carrasco, Marine and Florens, Jean-Pierre and Rena... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
73 Engl, Heinz Werner and Hanke, Martin and Neubauer,... 1996 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
74 Bilodeau, Blair and Foster, Dylan J and Roy, Danie... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
75 Tong Zhang 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
76 Chen, Xiaohong 2007 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
77 Schmidt-Hieber, Johannes 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
78 Schmidt-Hieber, Johannes 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
79 Vijaykumar, Suhas 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
80 Deaner, Ben 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
81 Jonas Rothfuss and Fabio Ferreira and Simon Walthe... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
82 Foster, Dylan J and Syrgkanis, Vasilis (self) 2019 2 1 1.0 0.010 0.110 0%
83 Van de Geer, Sara 1993 2 1 1.0 0.010 0.110 0%
84 Charles Mitchell and Sara van de Geer 2009 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
85 Vaart, Aad W van der and Dudoit, Sandrine and Laan... 2006 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
86 Guillaume Lecue 2013 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
87 Lecue 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
88 Lecue 2009 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
89 Lecue 2014 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.