← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Set-Valued Control Functions
Sukjin Han, Hiroaki Kaido
https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00347
189
Citation mentions
109
Cited references
12
Sections
8,216
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Bertanha, M., M. Luflade, and I. Mourifie 2024 11 3 21.0 0.058 1.000 100%
2 Blundell, R. and J. L. Powell 2003 4 3 6.0 0.021 0.928 100%
3 Newey, W. K., J. L. Powell, and F. Vella 1999 4 4 7.0 0.021 0.928 100%
4 Molchanov, I. and F. Molinari 2018 4 3 8.0 0.021 0.928 100%
5 Balat, J. F. and S. Han (self) 2023 3 3 5.0 0.016 0.843 100%
6 Han, S. (self) 2021 3 3 5.0 0.016 0.843 100%
7 Auerbach, E. 2022 3 3 5.0 0.016 0.843 100%
8 Heckman, J. J. and E. Vytlacil 2005 3 3 5.0 0.016 0.843 100%
9 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2017 7 3 6.5 0.037 0.830 57%
10 Thornton, R. L. 2008 4 2 7.0 0.021 0.811 100%
11 Jovanovic, B. 1989 4 2 7.0 0.021 0.811 100%
12 Manski, C. F. and E. Tamer 2002 6 4 6.5 0.032 0.794 50%
13 Molinari, F. 2020 10 5 11.5 0.053 0.794 50%
14 Imbens, G. W. and J. D. Angrist 1994 3 2 4.0 0.016 0.737 100%
15 Tamer, E. 2003 3 2 5.0 0.016 0.737 100%
16 Ciliberto, F., C. Murry, and E. Tamer 2021 3 2 5.0 0.016 0.737 100%
17 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2009 3 2 5.0 0.016 0.737 100%
18 Galichon, A. and M. Henry 2011 3 2 5.0 0.016 0.737 100%
19 Molchanov, I. 2017 6 4 5.0 0.032 0.693 33%
20 Heckman, J. J. 1979 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
21 Eisenhauer, P., J. J. Heckman, and E. Vytlacil 2015 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
22 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2023 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
23 Vytlacil, E. 2002 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
24 Beresteanu, A., I. Molchanov, and F. Molinari 2011 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
25 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2019 2 2 4.0 0.011 0.644 100%
26 Han, S. and S. Lee (self) 2023 2 2 4.0 0.011 0.644 100%
27 Chernozhukov, V., S. Lee, and A. M. Rosen 2013 2 2 2.5 0.011 0.511 50%
28 Ponomarev, K. 2022 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
29 Kaido, H. and Y. Zhang (self) 2025 4 2 3.5 0.021 0.511 25%
30 Dhrymes, P. J. 1970 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
31 Olley, G. S. and A. Pakes 1996 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
32 Levinsohn, J. and A. Petrin 2003 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
33 Ackerberg, D. A., K. Caves, and G. Frazer 2015 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
34 Kline, P. and C. R. Walters 2016 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
35 Card, D., S. DellaVigna, P. Funk, and N. Iriberri 2019 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
36 Abdulkadiro\u glu, A., P. A. Pathak, J. Schellenbe... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
37 Bishop, K. C., J. D. Ketcham, and N. V. Kuminoff 2022 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
38 Canay, I. A. and A. M. Shaikh 2017 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
39 Newey, W. K. and J. L. Powell 2003 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
40 Hall, P. and J. L. Horowitz 2005 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
41 Chernozhukov, V. and C. Hansen 2005 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
42 Darolles, S., Y. Fan, J.-P. Florens, and E. Renaul... 2011 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
43 D'Haultfoeuille, X. and P. Fevrier 2015 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
44 Torgovitsky, A. 2015 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
45 Vuong, Q. and H. Xu 2017 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
46 Chen, X. and T. M. Christensen 2018 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
47 Chesher, A. 2003 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
48 Das, M., W. K. Newey, and F. Vella 2003 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
49 Blundell, R. W. and J. L. Powell 2004 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
50 D'Haultfoeuille, X., S. Hoderlein, and Y. Sasaki 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
51 Newey, W. K. and S. Stouli 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
52 Nagasawa, K. 2024 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
53 Newey, W. K. 1987 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
54 Rivers, D. and Q. H. Vuong 1988 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
55 Smith, R. J. and R. W. Blundell 1986 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
56 Blundell, R. W. and R. J. Smith 1989 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
57 Abadie, A., J. Angrist, and G. Imbens 2002 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
58 Chesher, A. and K. Smolinski 2012 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
59 Chesher, A. and A. M. Rosen 2013 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
60 Chesher, A., D. Kim, and A. M. Rosen 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
61 Chesher, A., A. M. Rosen, and Y. Zhang 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
62 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2005 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
63 Shaikh, A. M. and E. J. Vytlacil 2011 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
64 Jun, S. J., J. Pinkse, and H. Xu 2011 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
65 Mourifie, I. 2015 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
66 Mogstad, M., A. Santos, and A. Torgovitsky 2018 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
67 Machado, C., A. M. Shaikh, and E. J. Vytlacil 2019 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
68 Han, S. and S. Yang (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
69 Blundell, R., D. Kristensen, and R. L. Matzkin 2013 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
70 Blundell, R. and R. L. Matzkin 2014 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
71 Dal Bo, E., F. Finan, N. Y. Li, and L. Schechter 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
72 Brinch, C. N., M. Mogstad, and M. Wiswall 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
73 Heckman, J. J. and B. E. Honore 1990 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
74 Heckman, J. J. and E. J. Vytlacil 2007 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
75 Gautier, E. and S. Hoderlein 2011 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
76 Villani, C. 2008 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
77 Carlier, G., A. Galichon, and F. Santambrogio 2010 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
78 Joe, H. 2014 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
79 Andrews, D. W. K. and X. Shi 2013 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
80 Chen, X., T. M. Christensen, and E. Tamer 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
81 Kaido, H. and F. Molinari (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
82 Luo, Y. and H. Wang 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
83 Bontemps, C. and R. Kumar 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
84 Li, L. and M. Henry 2024 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
85 Pinkse, J. 2000 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
86 Chernozhukov, V., I. Fernandez-Val, W. Newey, S. S... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
87 Imbens, G. W. and W. K. Newey 2002 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
88 Carneiro, P., J. J. Heckman, and E. Vytlacil 2010 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
89 Robins, J. M. 1997 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
90 Rubin, D. B. 1978 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
91 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2013 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
92 Graham, B. S. 2011 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
93 Aronow, P. M. and C. Samii 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
94 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2010 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
95 Ponomareva, M. and E. Tamer 2011 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
96 Kirkeboen, L. J., E. Leuven, and M. Mogstad 2016 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
97 Abdulkadiro\u glu, A., J. D. Angrist, Y. Narita, a... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
98 Agarwal, N. and P. Somaini 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
99 Fack, G., J. Grenet, and Y. He 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
100 Horowitz, J. L. and C. F. Manski 1995 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
101 Manski, C. F. and J. V. Pepper 2000 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
102 Manski, C. F. 1990 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
103 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1997 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
104 Mogstad, M., A. Torgovitsky, and C. R. Walters 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
105 Blandhol, C., J. Bonney, M. Mogstad, and A. Torgov... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
106 Słoczyński, T. 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
107 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.087 0%
108 Sosa-Rub\'\i, S. G., O. Galarraga, and J. E. Harri... 2009 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
109 Chernozhukov, V., H. Hong, and E. Tamer 2007 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.