← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Vulnerability Webs:\\ Systemic Risk in Software Networks
Cornelius Fritz, Co-Pierre Georg, Angelo Mele, Michael Schweinberger
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13375
151
Citation mentions
77
Cited references
10
Sections
14,588
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Angelo Mele (self) 2017 10 3 17.0 0.066 1.000 100%
2 Michael Schweinberger and Mark S. Handcock (self) 5 3 7.0 0.033 1.000 100%
3 S. Babkin and J. R. Stewart and X. Long and M. Sch... (self) 2020 12 6 20.5 0.079 0.971 92%
4 Duy Q. Vu and David R. Hunter and Michael Schweinb... (self) 2013 8 4 11.0 0.053 0.909 75%
5 Angelo Mele (self) 2022 5 2 7.0 0.033 0.874 100%
6 Arun G. Chandrasekhar 2016 5 2 6.0 0.033 0.874 100%
7 Dahbura, Juan Nelson Martinez and Komatsu, Shota a... (self) 2021 8 5 9.5 0.053 0.855 62%
8 Vincent Boucher and Ismael Mourifie 2017 4 3 4.5 0.026 0.843 75%
9 Martínez Dahbura, Juan Nelson and Komatsu, Shota a... (self) 2023 3 2 4.0 0.020 0.737 100%
10 Sida Peng and Eirini Kalliamvakou and Peter Cihon ... 2023 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
11 Edelman, Benjamin G. and Ngwe, Donald and Peng, Si... 2023 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
12 Shakked Noy and Whitney Zhang 2023 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
13 Lawrence Blume and David Easley and Jon Kleinberg ... 2013 2 2 3.0 0.013 0.644 100%
14 Aureo DePaula and Seth Richards-Shubik and Elie Ta... 2018 3 1 3.0 0.020 0.585 100%
15 Bryan Graham 2017 3 1 3.0 0.020 0.585 100%
16 Graham, Bryan 2020 3 1 3.0 0.020 0.585 100%
17 J. R. Norris 1997 3 1 6.0 0.020 0.585 100%
18 Alexandre Decan and Tom Mens and Philippe Grosjean 2 1 2.0 0.013 0.511 100%
19 Mele, Angelo and Zhu, Lingjiong (self) 2023 2 2 1.5 0.013 0.511 50%
20 Nathan LaBelle and Eugene Wallingford 2 1 2.0 0.013 0.511 100%
21 Sam Boysel 2023 2 1 2.0 0.013 0.511 100%
22 DePaula, Aureo 2017 2 1 2.0 0.013 0.511 100%
23 Sergio Currarini and Matthew O. Jackson and Paolo ... 2010 2 1 2.0 0.013 0.511 100%
24 Vincent D Blondel and Jean-Loup Guillaume and Rena... 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
25 Schweinberger, Michael and Jonathan Stewart (self) 2020 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.511 50%
26 J. R. Stewart and M. Schweinberger (self) 2025 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.511 50%
27 M.J. Wainwright and M.l. Jordan 2008 2 2 2.5 0.013 0.511 50%
28 Sourin Chatterjee and Ahad N. Zehmakan 2 1 4.0 0.013 0.511 100%
29 Parametrix 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
30 William Schueller and Johannes Wachs and V. Served... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
31 John A. Lewis and Sallie M. Henry and Dennis G. Ka... 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
32 José L. Barros-Justo and Fernando Pinciroli and Sa... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
33 Herb Krasner 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
34 National Institute of Standards and Technology 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
35 R Core Team 2024 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
36 Durumeric, Zakir and Li, Frank and Kasten, James a... 2014 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
37 Traore, Soin Abdoul Kassif and Valero, Maria and S... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
38 Avi Goldfarb and Catherine Tucker 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
39 Josh Lerner and Jean Tirole 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
40 Xiaolong Zheng and Daniel Zeng and Huiqian Li and ... 2008 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
41 Riivo Kikas and Georgios Gousios and Marlon Dumas ... 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
42 Markus Zimmermann and Cristian-Alexandru Staicu an... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
43 Bramoulle 2016 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
44 Andrea Galeotti and Sanjeev Goyal and Jurjen Kamph... 2006 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
45 Matthew O. Jackson and Asher Wolinsky 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
46 Tom A.B Snijders 2002 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
47 Bonhomme, Stephane and Lamadon, Thibaut and Manres... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
48 2008 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
49 Goyal, Sanjeev and Vigier, Adrien 2014 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
50 Dziubi\'n 2013 1 1 1.0 0.007 0.406 100%
51 Knuth, Donald E. 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
52 Grace Murray Hopper 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
53 John McCarthy 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
54 Harold Abelson and Gerald Jay Sussman and Julie Su... 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
55 Alan C. Kay 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
56 Grove, David and DeFouw, Greg and Dean, Jeffrey an... 1997 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
57 Peter Bickel and David Choi and Xiangyu Chang and ... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
58 P. N. Krivitsky and M. S. Handcock and M. Morris 2011 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
59 P. N. Krivitsky and P. Coletti and N. Hens 2023 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
60 C. T. Butts 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
61 2020 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
62 C. T. Butts 2009 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
63 D. Lusher and J. Koskinen and G. Robins 2013 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
64 Monderer, Dov and Shapley, Lloyd 1996 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
65 M. Schweinberger and P. N. Krivitsky and C. T. But... (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
66 J. R. Stewart 2025 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
67 D. R. Hunter 2008 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
68 M. Schweinberger and R. P. Bomiriya and S. Babkin (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
69 C. Groendyke and D. Welch and D. R. Hunter 2012 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
70 T. Britton and P. D. O'Neill 2002 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
71 NIST 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
72 Federal Trade Commission 2024 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
73 Edgescan 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
74 Arora, Ashish and Telang, Rahul and Xu, Hao 2008 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
75 Arora, Ashish and Caulkins, Jonathan P. and Telang... 2006 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
76 Ramazan Yilmaz and Fatma Gizem Karaoglan Yilmaz 2023 1 1 2.0 0.007 0.406 100%
77 Schweinberger, Michael (self) 2020 1 1 0.5 0.007 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.