← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\vspace-0em
Lucas Girard, Yannick Guyonvarch
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.13023
220
Citation mentions
108
Cited references
6
Sections
22,425
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Imbens, G. and J. Angrist 1994 8 6 12.0 0.036 1.000 100%
2 Angrist, J. and G. Imbens 1995 7 5 10.0 0.032 1.000 100%
3 Angrist, J., G. Imbens, and D. Rubin 1996 7 5 10.0 0.032 1.000 100%
4 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2010 6 5 10.0 0.027 1.000 100%
5 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2010 5 3 9.0 0.023 1.000 100%
6 Imbens, G. 1992 5 3 9.0 0.023 1.000 100%
7 Angrist, J. 1990 4 4 7.0 0.018 0.928 100%
8 Angrist, J., K. Graddy, and G. Imbens 2000 4 4 8.0 0.018 0.928 100%
9 Angrist, J. and M. Rokkanen 2015 5 2 10.0 0.023 0.874 100%
10 Hirano, K., G. Imbens, and G. Ridder 2003 3 3 5.0 0.014 0.843 100%
11 Imbens, G. and T. Lemieux 2008 3 3 5.0 0.014 0.843 100%
12 Blandhol, C., J. Bonney, M. Mogstad, and A. Torgov... 2022 4 2 8.0 0.018 0.811 100%
13 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1996 4 2 8.0 0.018 0.811 100%
14 Rubin, D. 1974 3 3 3.5 0.014 0.737 67%
15 Abadie, A. and G. Imbens 2006 3 2 5.0 0.014 0.737 100%
16 Angrist, J. and I. Fernandez-Val 2010 3 2 6.0 0.014 0.737 100%
17 Deaton, A. 2010 3 2 6.0 0.014 0.737 100%
18 Snow, J. 1855 3 2 4.0 0.014 0.737 100%
19 Angrist, J., E. Bettinger, E. Bloom, E. King, and ... 2002 6 1 12.0 0.027 0.693 100%
20 KVA 2021 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
21 Angrist, J. and W. Evans 1998 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
22 Angrist, J. and A. Krueger 1991 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
23 Imbens, G. and W. Newey 2009 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
24 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2015 2 2 3.0 0.009 0.644 100%
25 Abadie, A., J. Angrist, and G. Imbens 2002 2 2 4.0 0.009 0.644 100%
26 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2001 4 1 8.0 0.018 0.644 100%
27 Angrist, J., E. Bettinger, and M. Kremer 4 1 8.0 0.018 0.644 100%
28 Angrist, J. and A. Kugler 2003 4 1 8.0 0.018 0.644 100%
29 Chernozhukov, V., D. Chetverikov, M. Demirer, E. D... 2018 2 2 4.0 0.009 0.644 100%
30 de Chaisemartin, C. and X. D'Haultfoeuille 2022 4 1 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
31 Roth, J., P. Sant'Anna, A. Bilinski, and J. Poe 2023 4 1 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
32 Abadie, A. 2003 3 1 6.0 0.014 0.585 100%
33 Acemoglu, D. and J. Angrist 2001 3 1 6.0 0.014 0.585 100%
34 Angrist, J. and J. Guryan 2004 3 1 6.0 0.014 0.585 100%
35 Angrist, J. and S. Chen 2011 3 1 6.0 0.014 0.585 100%
36 Angrist, J., V. Lavy, J. Leder-Luis, and A. Shany 2019 3 1 6.0 0.014 0.585 100%
37 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1990 2 2 1.5 0.009 0.511 50%
38 Neyman, J. 1923 2 2 2.5 0.009 0.511 50%
39 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2009 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
40 Angrist, J., V. Chernozhukov, and I. Fernández-Val 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
41 Angrist, J., S. Chen, and B. Frandsen 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
42 Angrist, J., V. Lavy, and A. Schlosser 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
43 Angrist, J., S. Dynarski, T. Kane, P. Pathak, and ... 2012 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
44 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2022 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
45 Abdulkadiroglu, A., J. Angrist, and P. Pathak 2014 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
46 Abdulkadiroglu, A., J. Angrist, Y. Narita, and P. ... 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
47 Chamberlain, G. 1987 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
48 Imbens, G. and T. Lancaster 1994 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
49 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1997 2 1 4.0 0.009 0.511 100%
50 Wright, P. G. 1928 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
51 Reiersol, O. 1945 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
52 Wooldridge, J. 2010 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
53 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1993 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
54 Angrist, J. and V. Lavy 1999 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
55 Imbens, G., R. Spady, and P. Johnson 1998 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
56 Arkhangelsky, D., S. Athey, D. Hirshberg, G. Imben... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
57 Angrist, J. and J.-S. Pischke 2008 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
58 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2015 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
59 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1978 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
60 Maddala, G. 1983 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
61 Bjorklund, A. and R. Moffitt 1987 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
62 Heckman, J. 1990 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
63 Tinbergen, J. 1930 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
64 Haavelmo, T. 1944 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
65 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
66 Card, D. and A. Krueger 1992 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
67 Abadie, A., S. Athey, G. Imbens, and J. Wooldridge 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
68 Imbens, G. and D. Rubin 1997 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
69 Vytlacil, E. 2002 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
70 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2006 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
71 Boyd, D., D. Goldhaber, H. Lankford, and J. Wyckof... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
72 Goldhaber, D. 2007 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
73 Angrist, J., D. Lang, and P. Oreopoulos 2009 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
74 Angrist, J. and K. Lang 2004 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
75 Card, D. 1990 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
76 Gale, D. and L. Shapley 1962 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
77 Abdulkadiroglu, A., J. Angrist, S. Dynarski, T. Ka... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
78 Angrist, J., S. Cohodes, S. Dynarski, P. Pathak, a... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
79 Abdulkadiroglu, A., J. Angrist, P. Hull, and P. Pa... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
80 Angrist, J., P. Pathak, and C. Walters 2013 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
81 Abdulkadiroglu, A., J. Angrist, Y. Narita, P. Path... 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
82 Cosslett, S. 1981 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
83 Hajek, J. 1971 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
84 Hansen, L. P. 1982 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
85 Owen, A. 1990 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
86 Hellerstein, J. and G. Imbens 1999 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
87 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2002 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
88 Donald, S., G. Imbens, and W. Newey 2003 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
89 Guggenberger, P. 2008 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
90 Horvitz, D. and D. Thompson 1952 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
91 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2000 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
92 Hirano, K. and G. Imbens 2004 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
93 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2008 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
94 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2011 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
95 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2012 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
96 Rosenbaum, P. and D. Rubin 1983 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
97 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2016 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
98 Imbens, G. and K. Kalyanaraman 2011 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
99 Gelman, A. and G. Imbens 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
100 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
101 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
102 Breiman, L., J. Friedman, C. Stone, and R. Olshen 1984 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
103 Athey, S. and G. Imbens 2006 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
104 Chernozhukov, V., G. Imbens, and W. Newey 2007 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
105 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
106 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
107 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
108 Manski, C. 2003 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.