← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Inference on LATEs with covariates
Tom Boot, Didier Nibbering
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.12607
111
Citation mentions
46
Cited references
14
Sections
8,550
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Blandhol, C., J. Bonney, M. Mogstad, and A. Torgov... 2022 10 4 18.0 0.090 1.000 100%
2 Mikusheva, A. and L. Sun 2022 5 3 8.0 0.045 1.000 100%
3 Lee, S 2018 6 3 11.0 0.054 1.000 100%
4 Evdokimov, K. S. and M. Kolesar 2018 6 4 11.0 0.054 1.000 100%
5 Chao, J. C., N. R. Swanson, and T. Woutersen 2023 6 4 11.0 0.054 1.000 100%
6 Card, D 1995 6 3 10.0 0.054 1.000 100%
7 Angrist, J. D. and G. W. Imbens 1995 4 3 6.0 0.036 0.928 100%
8 Bekker, P. A 1994 4 4 7.0 0.036 0.928 100%
9 Dupas, P., D. Karlan, J. Robinson, and D. Ubfal 2018 4 3 7.0 0.036 0.928 100%
10 Imbens, G. W. and J. D. Angrist 1994 3 3 4.0 0.027 0.843 100%
11 Crudu, F., G. Mellace, and Z. Sandor 2021 3 3 5.0 0.027 0.843 100%
12 Kolesar, M 2013 3 3 5.0 0.027 0.843 100%
13 Muralidharan, K., A. Singh, and A. J. Ganimian 2019 4 2 7.0 0.036 0.811 100%
14 Stevenson, M. T 2018 3 2 5.0 0.027 0.737 100%
15 S\loczy\'nski, T 2024 3 2 5.0 0.027 0.737 100%
16 Ackerberg, D. A. and P. J. Devereux 2009 3 2 6.0 0.027 0.737 100%
17 Finkelstein, A., S. L. Taubman, H. L. Allen, B. J.... 2016 3 2 6.0 0.027 0.737 100%
18 Mogstad, M. and A. Torgovitsky 2024 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
19 Chao, J. C. and N. R. Swanson 2005 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
20 Hausman, J. A., W. K. Newey, T. Woutersen, J. C. C... 2012 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
21 Matsushita, Y. and T. Otsu 2024 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
22 Finkelstein, A., S. Taubman, B. Wright, M. Bernste... 2012 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
23 Hartley, H., J. Rao, and G. Kiefer 1969 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
24 Staiger, D. and J. H. Stock 1997 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Bekker, P. A. and F. Kleibergen 2003 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Lim, D., W. Wang, and Y. Zhang 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Aizer, A. and J. J. Doyle Jr 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Mueller-Smith, M 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Sigstad, H 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Vilfort, V. and W. Zhang 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 De Chaisemartin, C 2017 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Abadie, A 2003 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Frolich, M 2007 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Chernozhukov, V., D. Chetverikov, M. Demirer, E. D... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Angrist, J. D. and J.-S. Pischke 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Crump, R. K., V. J. Hotz, G. W. Imbens, and O. A. ... 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Angrist, J. D., G. W. Imbens, and A. B. Krueger 1999 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Cattaneo, M. D., M. Jansson, and W. K. Newey 2018 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Kleibergen, F 2005 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
40 Abadie, A., S. Athey, G. W. Imbens, and J. M. Wool... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
41 MacKinnon, J. G., M. \O. Nielsen, and M. D. Webb 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
42 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Chao, J. C., N. R. Swanson, J. A. Hausman, W. K. N... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Ligtenberg, J. W 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Boot, T., G. Niccodemi, and T. Wansbeek (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Abadie, A. and G. W. Imbens 2006 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.