← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Credible causal inference beyond toy models
Pablo Geraldo Bastías
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11659
94
Citation mentions
60
Cited references
5
Sections
8,883
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Imbens, G. W 2020 6 3 12.0 0.064 1.000 100%
2 Pearl, J 2009 4 4 7.0 0.043 0.928 100%
3 Lundberg, I., Johnson, R., & Stewart, B. M 2021 3 3 4.0 0.032 0.843 100%
4 Petersen, M. L., & van der Laan, M. J 2014 3 3 5.0 0.032 0.843 100%
5 Morgan, S. L., & Winship, C 2014 3 3 6.0 0.032 0.843 100%
6 Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B 2015 3 2 5.0 0.032 0.737 100%
7 Cinelli, C., Forney, A., & Pearl, J 2022 3 2 6.0 0.032 0.737 100%
8 Sharkey, P., Torrats-Espinosa, G., & Takyar, D 2017 8 1 16.0 0.085 0.693 100%
9 Pearl, J., & Mackenzie, D 2018 2 2 2.0 0.021 0.644 100%
10 Rubin, D. B 2008 2 2 3.0 0.021 0.644 100%
11 Cinelli, C., & Hazlett, C 2020 2 2 4.0 0.021 0.644 100%
12 Imbens, G. W 2010 2 2 4.0 0.021 0.644 100%
13 Elwert, F 2013 2 2 4.0 0.021 0.644 100%
14 Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B 1995 2 2 4.0 0.021 0.644 100%
15 Rosenbaum, P. R 1995 2 2 4.0 0.021 0.644 100%
16 Westreich, D 2019 2 2 4.0 0.021 0.644 100%
17 2 1 4.0 0.021 0.511 100%
18 Samii, C 2016 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
19 Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S 2010 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
20 Bareinboim, E., Correa, J. D., Ibeling, D., & Icar... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
21 Cartwright, N 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
22 Cartwright, N 1995 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
23 Sekhon, J. S 2009 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
24 Maclaren, O. J., & Nicholson, R 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
25 Dawid, A. P 2000 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
26 Dawid, A. P 2020 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
27 Rubin, D. B 2005 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
28 Pearl, J., Glymour, M., & Jewell, N. P 2016 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
29 Pearl, J 2010 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
30 Hernan, M. A., & Robins, J. M 2023 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
31 Holland, P. W 1986 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
32 Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A 2008 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
33 Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B 1983 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
34 Rubin, D. B 2007 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
35 Athey, S., & Imbens, G 2016 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
36 Eckles, D., & Bakshy, E 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
37 Rosenbaum, P. R 2010 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
38 VanderWeele, T. J., & Arah, O. A 2011 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
39 Lewbel, A 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
40 Pearl, J 1995 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
41 Robins, J. M., Hernan, M. A., & Brumback, B 2000 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
42 Pearl, J., & Robins, J 1995 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
43 Pearl, J 2001 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
44 Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J.-S 2009 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
45 Doleac, J. L 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
46 Cunningham, S 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
47 Brumback, B. A 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
48 Liu, T., Ungar, L., & Kording, K 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
49 Peters, J., Janzing, D., & Scholkopf, B 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
50 Laubach, Z. M., Murray, E. J., Hoke, K. L., Safran... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
51 Shalizi, C. R 2021 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
52 Aronow, P. M., & Savje, F 2020 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
53 Breen, R 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
54 Levitt, S. D 2002 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
55 Rauscher, E 2016 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
56 Steiner, P. M., Kim, Y., Hall, C. E., & Su, D 2017 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
57 Hausman, C., & Rapson, D. S 2018 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
58 Zhou, X 2019 1 1 2.0 0.011 0.406 100%
59 Knight, C. R., & Winship, C 2013 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
60 Rohrer, J. M 2018 1 1 1.0 0.011 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.