Citation Analysis

A maximal inequality for stationary empirical processes with application to strong approximations
Demian Pouzo
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.11394

109

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

9,164

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	6	3	10.0	0.055	1.000	100%
2	13	4	17.5	0.119	0.974	92%
3	10	4	16.5	0.092	0.966	90%
4	18	7	31.0	0.165	0.962	89%
5	6	3	7.0	0.055	0.874	67%
6	3	3	5.0	0.028	0.843	100%
7	4	4	6.5	0.037	0.843	75%
8	3	3	4.5	0.028	0.737	67%
9	7	2	8.0	0.064	0.659	43%
10	2	2	3.0	0.018	0.644	100%
11	3	2	4.5	0.028	0.644	67%
12	3	1	3.0	0.028	0.585	100%
13	2	2	2.5	0.018	0.511	50%
14	2	1	4.0	0.018	0.511	100%
15	7	2	5.0	0.064	0.457	14%
16	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
17	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
18	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
19	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
20	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
21	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
22	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
23	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
24	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
25	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
26	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
27	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
28	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
29	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
30	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
31	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
32	1	1	1.0	0.009	0.406	100%
33	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
34	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%
35	1	1	2.0	0.009	0.406	100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.