Citation Analysis

Optimizing Adaptive Experiments: A Unified Approach to Regret Minimization and Best-Arm Identification
Chao Qin, Daniel Russo
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10592
195
Citation mentions
72
Cited references
20
Sections
13,994
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Lai, Tze Leung and Robbins, Herbert 1985 16 9 24.0 0.082 1.000 100%
2 Russo, Daniel (self) 2016 5 5 8.5 0.026 1.000 100%
3 Russo, Daniel (self) 2020 14 9 23.5 0.072 0.950 86%
4 Chernoff, Herman 1959 6 6 9.0 0.031 0.941 83%
5 Chan, Hock Peng and Lai, Tze Leung 2006 5 2 4.0 0.026 0.874 100%
6 Kaufmann, Emilie and Cappe 2016 3 3 5.0 0.015 0.843 100%
7 Glynn, Peter and Juneja, Sandeep 2004 4 2 5.0 0.021 0.811 100%
8 Lattimore, Tor and Szepesva 2020 6 5 6.5 0.031 0.794 50%
9 Qin, Chao and Klabjan, Diego and Russo, Daniel (self) 2017 5 4 4.0 0.026 0.737 40%
10 Garivier, Aure 2016 30 11 26.0 0.154 0.716 37%
11 Shang, Xuedong and Heide, Rianne and Menard, Pierr... 2020 14 8 13.0 0.072 0.710 36%
12 Chao Qin and Wei You (self) 2023 10 7 9.5 0.051 0.669 30%
13 Thompson, William R 1933 2 2 3.0 0.010 0.644 100%
14 Chick, Stephen E. and Inoue, Koichiro 2001 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
15 Chen, Chun-Hung and Lin, Jianwu and Yu 2000 2 2 2.5 0.010 0.644 100%
16 Emilie Kaufmann and Wouter M. Koolen 2021 8 4 7.0 0.041 0.630 25%
17 Jamieson, Kevin and Malloy, Matthew and Nowak, Rob... 2014 3 1 1.5 0.015 0.585 100%
18 Degenne, Remy and Nedelec, Thomas and Calauzenes, ... 2019 3 1 1.5 0.015 0.585 100%
19 Bui, Loc and Johari, Ramesh and Mannor, Shie 2011 2 1 1.0 0.010 0.511 100%
20 Qining Zhang and Lei Ying 2023 2 1 1.0 0.010 0.511 100%
21 Kasy, Maximilian and Sautmann, Anja 2021 2 1 1.0 0.010 0.511 100%
22 Steven Scott 2013 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
23 Brian Amadio 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
24 Bubeck, Se 2009 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
25 Villar, Sof\'\i 2015 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
26 Chapelle, Olivier and Li, Lihong 2011 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
27 Hong, L Jeff and Fan, Weiwei and Luo, Jun 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
28 Agrawal, Rajeev and Teneketzis, Demosthenis and An... 1989 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
29 Agrawal, Rajeev and Teneketzis, Demosthenis and An... 1989 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
30 Graves, Todd L. and Lai, Tze Leung 1997 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
31 Kanarios, Kellen and Zhang, Qining and Ying, Lei 2024 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
32 Sébastien Bubeck and Rémi Munos and Gilles Stoltz 2011 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
33 Russo, Daniel and Van Roy, Benjamin (self) 2018 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
34 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
35 Chao Qin and Daniel Russo (self) 2023 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
36 Zixin Zhong and Wang Chi Cheung and Vincent Tan 2023 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
37 Chen, Ye and Ryzhov, Ilya O 2023 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
38 Qin, Chao (self) 2022 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
39 Ariu, Kaito and Kato, Masahiro and Komiyama, Junpe... (self) 2021 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
40 Degenne, Re 2023 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
41 Rosenzweig, L. R. and Offer-Westort, M. 2022 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
42 Wald, Abraham 1947 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
43 Arrow, Kenneth J and Blackwell, David and Girshick... 1949 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
44 Lai, TL and Levin, Bruce and Robbins, Herbert and ... 1980 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
45 Fudenberg, Drew and Strack, Philipp and Strzalecki... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
46 Morris, Stephen and Strack, Philipp 2019 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
47 Liang, Annie and Mu, Xiaosheng and Syrgkanis, Vasi... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
48 Karun Adusumilli 2023 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
49 Chick, Stephen E. and Gans, Noah 2009 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
50 Chick, Stephen E. and Frazier, Peter 2012 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
51 Chick, Stephen E. and Gans, Noah and Yapar, O 2021 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
52 Yun- 2014 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
53 Tong Li and Jacob Nogas and Haochen Song and Harsh... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
54 Caria, A Stefano and Gordon, Grant and Kasy, Maxim... 2023 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
55 Susan Athey and Undral Byambadalai and Vitor Hadad... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
56 Bhat, Nikhil and Farias, Vivek F and Moallemi, Cia... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
57 Jinglong Zhao 2023 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
58 Jessica Dai and Paula Gradu and Christopher Harsha... 2023 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
59 Adusumilli, Karun 2022 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
60 Erraqabi, Akram and Lazaric, Alessandro and Valko,... 2017 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
61 Simchi-Levi, David and Wang, Chonghuan 2023 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.406 100%
62 Efron, Bradley 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
63 Cappe 2013 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
64 Scott, Steven L. 2010 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
65 Cover, Thomas M. and Thomas, Joy A. 2006 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
66 Marc Jourdan and Re 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
67 Degenne, R\'e 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
68 Degenne, R\'e 2019 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
69 Degenne, Re 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
70 Boyd, Stephen and Vandenberghe, Lieven 2004 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
71 Gray, Robert M. 2011 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
72 Yury Polyanskiy and Yihong Wu 2023+ 1 1 0.5 0.005 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.