Citation Analysis

When Can We Use Two-Way Fixed-Effects (TWFE): A Comparison of TWFE and Novel Dynamic Difference-in-Differences Estimators
Tobias Rüttenauer, Ozan Aksoy
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.09928
109
Citation mentions
37
Cited references
13
Sections
3,092
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2021 12 6 20.0 0.110 1.000 100%
2 Callaway, Brantly and Sant'Anna, Pedro H.C. 2021 14 7 26.0 0.128 1.000 100%
3 Sun, Liyang and Abraham, Sarah 2021 7 4 12.0 0.064 1.000 100%
4 Borusyak, Kirill and Jaravel, Xavier and Spiess, J... 2024 9 6 17.0 0.083 1.000 100%
5 Athey, Susan and Bayati, Mohsen and Doudchenko, Ni... 2021 9 4 17.0 0.083 1.000 100%
6 Roth, Jonathan and Sant'Anna, Pedro H.C. and Bilin... 2023 5 4 9.0 0.046 1.000 100%
7 Goodman-Bacon 2021 10 5 16.5 0.092 0.966 90%
8 Chiu, Albert and Lan, Xingchen and Liu, Ziyi and X... 2023 4 4 7.0 0.037 0.928 100%
9 De Chaisemartin, Cle 2020 3 3 5.0 0.028 0.843 100%
10 Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2010 3 2 4.0 0.028 0.737 100%
11 Currie, Janet and Davis, Lucas and Greenstone, Mic... 2015 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
12 Freedman, Seth M. and Hollingsworth, Alex and Simo... 2023 2 2 3.0 0.018 0.644 100%
13 Ludwig, Volker and Bru 2021 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
14 Roth, Jonathan 2022 2 2 4.0 0.018 0.644 100%
15 Xu, Yiqing 2017 3 1 6.0 0.028 0.585 100%
16 Angrist, Joshua David and Pischke, Jo 2015 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
17 Huntington-Klein 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
18 Gangl, Markus 2010 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
19 Bru 2019 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
20 Schechtl, Manuel and Kapelle, Nicole 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
21 Struffolino, Emanuela and Van Winkle, Zachary 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
22 Zoch, Gundula 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
23 Currie, Janet and Voorheis, John and Walker, Reed 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Dochow, Stephan and Neumeyer, Sebastian 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Kneip, Thorsten and Bauer, Gerrit 2009 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
26 Aksoy, Ozan and Gambetta, Diego (self) 2021 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Osberghaus, Daniel and Fugger, Carina 2022 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Ru 2024 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Ghanem, Dalia and Sant'Anna, Pedro H. C. and Wu 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Bernardi, Laura and Bollmann, Gre 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Kratz, Fabian 2020 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Clark, Andrew E. and Georgellis, Yannis 2013 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Baccini, Leonardo and Leemann, Lucas 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Conte Keivabu, Risto and Ru 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Imai, Kosuke and Kim, In Song and Wang, Erik H. 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Abadie, Alberto and Diamond, Alexis and Hainmuelle... 2010 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Ru 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.