Citation Analysis

Difference-in-Differences Estimators with Continuous Treatments and no Stayers
Clément de Chaisemartin, Xavier D'Haultfœuille, Gonzalo Vazquez-Bare
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.05432
14
Citation mentions
8
Cited references
5
Sections
1,640
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Clement de Chaisemartin, Xavier D'Haultfoeuille, F... (self) 2023 5 3 8.5 0.357 0.928 80%
2 Olivier Desch\^enes \harvardand\ Michael Greenston... 2012 3 2 3.0 0.214 0.511 33%
3 Oliver Linton \harvardand\ Jens Perch Nielsen 1995 1 1 2.0 0.071 0.406 100%
4 Efang Kong, Oliver Linton \harvardand\ Yingcun Xia 2010 1 1 2.0 0.071 0.406 100%
5 Charles J Stone 1985 1 1 2.0 0.071 0.406 100%
6 Herman J Bierens 1982 1 1 2.0 0.071 0.406 100%
7 Yongmiao Hong \harvardand\ Halbert White 1995 1 1 2.0 0.071 0.406 100%
8 Clement De Chaisemartin \harvardand\ Xavier D’Haul... 2020 1 1 0.5 0.071 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.