← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

2402.00584
Victor Chernozhukov, Iván Fernández-Val, Chen Huang, Weining Wang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.00584
67
Citation mentions
46
Cited references
8
Sections
14,172
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Chen, S., Chernozhukov, V., and Fernandez-Val, I (self) 2019 4 3 6.0 0.060 0.928 100%
2 Newey, W. K. and Smith, R. J 2004 3 2 4.0 0.045 0.737 100%
3 Alvarez, J. and Arellano, M 2003 3 2 4.0 0.045 0.737 100%
4 Belloni, A., Chen, D., Chernozhukov, V., and Hanse... (self) 2012 3 2 5.0 0.045 0.737 100%
5 Newey, W. K. and Windmeijer, F 2009 3 2 4.0 0.045 0.737 100%
6 Bickel, P. J., Ritov, Y., and Tsybakov, A. B 2009 3 2 5.0 0.045 0.737 100%
7 Belloni, A. and Chernozhukov, V (self) 2013 2 2 3.0 0.030 0.644 100%
8 Chernozhukov, V., Kasahara, H., and Schrimpf, P (self) 2021b 2 2 3.0 0.030 0.644 100%
9 Angrist, J. D. and Krueger, A. B 1995 3 1 6.0 0.045 0.585 100%
10 Dirksen, S 2015 3 1 6.0 0.045 0.585 100%
11 Donald, S. G., Imbens, G. W., and Newey, W. K 2009 2 1 2.0 0.030 0.511 100%
12 El Machkouri, M., Volny, D., and Wu, W. B 2013 2 1 4.0 0.030 0.511 100%
13 Bond, S. R 2002 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
14 Holtz-Eakin, D., Newey, W., and Rosen, H. S 1988 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
15 Arellano, M. and Bond, S 1991 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
16 Tibshirani, R 1996 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
17 Kuersteiner, G. and Okui, R 2010 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
18 Okui, R 2011 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
19 Luo, Y 2016 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
20 Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., and Hansen, C (self) 2011 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
21 Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Du... (self) 2018 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
22 Okui, R 2009 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
23 Carrasco, M. and Nayihouba, A 2024 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
24 Carrasco, M 2012 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
25 Cheng, X., Sanchez-Becerra, A., and Shephard, A. J 2023 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
26 Dhaene, G. and Jochmans, K 2015 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
27 Chang, J., Chen, S. X., and Chen, X 2015 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
28 Shi, Z 2016 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
29 Chang, J., Chen, S. X., Tang, C. Y., and Wu, T. T 2021 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
30 Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Ha... (self) 2018 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
31 Kock, A. B. and Tang, H 2019 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
32 Semenova, V., Goldman, M., Chernozhukov, V., and T... (self) 2023 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
33 Phillips, G. D. A. and Hale, C 1977 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
34 Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., and Krueger, A. B 1999 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
35 Wu, W. B 2005 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
36 Arellano, M 2003 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
37 Chen, L., Wang, W., and Wu, W. B (self) 2022 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
38 Chernozhukov, V., H\"ardle, W., Huang, C., and Wan... (self) 2021a 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
39 Blundell, R. and Bond, S 1998 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
40 Anderson, T. W. and Rubin, H 1949 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
41 Hayakawa, K 2009 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
42 Hayakawa, K., Qi, M., and Breitung, J 2019 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
43 Burkholder, D. L 1988 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
44 Rio, E 2009 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
45 Zhang, D. and Wu, W. B 2017 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
46 Rudelson, M. and Zhou, S 2012 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.