← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Regularizing Fairness in Optimal Policy Learning with Distributional Targets
Anders Bredahl Kock, David Preinerstorfer
https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.17909
98
Citation mentions
45
Cited references
16
Sections
7,450
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Viviano, D. and Bradic, J. 2023 9 4 13.0 0.092 1.000 100%
2 Lyons, E. and Zhang, L. 2017 6 3 12.0 0.061 1.000 100%
3 Kitagawa, T. and Tetenov, A. 2021 11 6 15.5 0.112 0.899 73%
4 Kock, A. B., Preinerstorfer, D. and Veliyev, B. (self) 2022 4 3 5.5 0.041 0.843 75%
5 Berk, R., Heidari, H., Jabbari, S., Joseph, M., Ke... 2017 3 3 6.0 0.031 0.843 100%
6 Bilias, Y. 2000 3 3 6.0 0.031 0.843 100%
7 Kock, A. B., Preinerstorfer, D. and Veliyev, B. (self) 2023 9 5 8.0 0.092 0.693 33%
8 Kitagawa, T. and Tetenov, A. 2018 3 2 2.5 0.031 0.644 67%
9 Cowell, F. 2011 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.644 100%
10 Chakravarty, S. R. 2009 2 2 3.0 0.020 0.644 100%
11 Fang, E. X., Wang, Z. and Wang, L. 2023 3 1 3.0 0.031 0.585 100%
12 Aliprantis, C. and Border, K. 2006 5 4 4.0 0.051 0.585 20%
13 Athey, S. and Wager, S. 2021 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
14 Pessach, D. and Shmueli, E. 2022 2 1 2.0 0.020 0.511 100%
15 Massart, P. 1990 2 2 2.5 0.020 0.511 50%
16 Sun, L. 2021 2 2 2.5 0.020 0.511 50%
17 van der Vaart, A. and Wellner, J. 1996 2 1 4.0 0.020 0.511 100%
18 Manski, C. F. 2004 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
19 Dehejia, R. H. 2005 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
20 Stoye, J. 2009 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
21 Stoye, J. 2012 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
22 Bhattacharya, D. and Dupas, P. 2012 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
23 Manski, C. F. and Tetenov, A. 2016 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
24 Hirano, K. and Porter, J. R. 2009 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
25 Mbakop, E. and Tabord-Meehan, M. 2021 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
26 Hirano, K. and Porter, J. R. 2020 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
27 Kleinberg, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S. and Ra... 2018 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
28 Cowgill, B. and Tucker, C. E. 2019 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
29 Corbett-Davies, S. and Goel, S. 2018 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
30 Bitler, M. P., Gelbach, J. B. and Hoynes, H. W. 2006 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
31 Rostek, M. 2010 1 1 1.0 0.010 0.406 100%
32 Kamishima, T., Akaho, S. and Sakuma, J. 2011 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
33 Kamishima, T., Akaho, S., Asoh, H. and Sakuma, J. 2012 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
34 Bechavod, Y. and Ligett, K. 2017 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
35 Frauen, D., Melnychuk, V. and Feuerriegel, S. 2023 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
36 Tan, X., Qi, Z., Seymour, C. and Tang, L. 2022 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
37 Liese, F. and Miescke, K. J. 2008 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
38 Giné, E. and Nickl, R. 2015 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
39 Sen, A. 1976 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
40 Tukey, J. W. 1975 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
41 Kosiorowski, D. and Zawadzki, Z. 2022 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
42 Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Du... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.010 0.406 100%
43 van der Vaart, A. 1998 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
44 Bertsekas, D. P. 1999 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
45 Rempała, G. A. 2004 1 1 0.5 0.010 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.