Citation Analysis

Partial Identification of Binary Choice Models with Misreported Outcomes
Orville Mondal, Rui Wang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.17137
63
Citation mentions
42
Cited references
9
Sections
5,854
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Andrews, Donald WK and Shi, Xiaoxia 2013 5 3 10.0 0.079 1.000 100%
2 Hausman, Jerry A and Abrevaya, Jason and Scott-Mor... 1998 4 3 5.5 0.063 0.928 100%
3 Nguimkeu, Pierre and Denteh, Augustine and Tcherni... 2019 3 3 3.5 0.048 0.843 100%
4 Bollinger, Christopher R and David, Martin H 1997 3 2 2.5 0.048 0.737 100%
5 Chernozhukov, Victor and Hong, Han and Tamer, Elie 2007 3 2 6.0 0.048 0.737 100%
6 Meyer, Bruce D and Mittag, Nikolas and George, Rob... 2020 2 2 3.0 0.032 0.644 100%
7 Aigner, Dennis J 1973 2 2 1.5 0.032 0.644 100%
8 Meyer, Bruce D and Mittag, Nikolas 2017 2 2 1.5 0.032 0.644 100%
9 Manski, Charles F 1985 2 2 2.5 0.032 0.644 100%
10 Manski, Charles F 1987 2 2 2.5 0.032 0.644 100%
11 Mahajan, Aprajit 2006 2 2 2.5 0.032 0.644 100%
12 DiTraglia, Francis J and Garcia-Jimeno, Camilo 2019 2 2 2.5 0.032 0.644 100%
13 Ura, Takuya 2018 2 2 2.5 0.032 0.644 100%
14 Kane, Thomas J and Rouse, Cecilia E and Staiger, D... 1999 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
15 Davern, Michael and Klerman, Jacob A and Ziegenfus... 2009 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
16 Bollinger, Christopher R and David, Martin H 2001 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
17 Chen, Xiaohong and Hong, Han and Nekipelov, Denis 2011 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
18 Chamberlain, Gary 1980 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
19 Abrevaya, Jason and Hausman, Jerry A 1999 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
20 Lewbel, Arthur 2000 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
21 Mahajan, Aprajit 2003 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
22 Bollinger, Christopher R 1996 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
23 Frazis, Harley and Loewenstein, Mark A 2003 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
24 Lewbel, Arthur 2007 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
25 Chen, Xiaohong and Hong, Han and Tamer, Elie 2005 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
26 Chen, Xiaohong and Hu, Yingyao 2006 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
27 Chen, Xiaohong and Hu, Yingyao and Lewbel, Arthur 2008 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
28 Hu, Yingyao 2008 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
29 Molinari, Francesca 2008 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
30 Hu, Yingyao and Schennach, Susanne M 2008 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
31 Hu, Yingyao and Schennach, Susanne and Shiu, Ji-Li... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
32 Kreider, Brent and Pepper, John V 2007 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
33 Kreider, Brent and Pepper, John V and Gundersen, C... 2012 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
34 Battistin, Erich and De Nadai, Michele and Sianesi... 2014 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
35 Calvi, Rossella and Lewbel, Arthur and Tommasi, De... 2017 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
36 Horowitz, Joel L and Manski, Charles F 1995 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
37 Kreider, Brent and Pepper, John 2008 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
38 Kreider, Brent and Pepper, John V 2011 1 1 0.5 0.016 0.406 100%
39 Imbens, Gw and Angrist, Jd 1994 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
40 Meyer, Bruce D and Mok, Wallace KC and Sullivan, J... 2009 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
41 Chernozhukov, Victor and Lee, Sokbae and Rosen, Ad... 2013 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
42 Card, David 1995 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.