Citation Analysis – Congestion Pricing for Efficiency and Equity: Theory and Applications to the San Francisco Bay Area

Citation Analysis

Congestion Pricing for Efficiency and Equity: Theory and Applications to the San Francisco Bay Area
Chinmay Maheshwari, Kshitij Kulkarni, Druv Pai, Jiarui Yang, Manxi Wu, Shankar Sastry
https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.16844

122

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

6,401

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Guo, X. and Yang, H (self)	2010	6	3	6.5	0.049	1.000	100%
2	Yang, H. and Huang, H.-J (self)	2005	4	3	4.5	0.033	0.928	100%
3	Hoefer, M., Olbrich, L., and Skopalik, A	2008	4	3	4.0	0.033	0.928	100%
4	Bonifaci, V., Salek, M., and Schafer, G	2011	4	3	4.0	0.033	0.928	100%
5	Athira, I., Muneera, C., Krishnamurthy, K., and An...	2016	3	3	5.0	0.025	0.843	100%
6	Small, K. A	1992	3	2	2.0	0.025	0.737	100%
7	Fleischer, L., Jain, K., and Mahdian, M	2004	3	2	5.0	0.025	0.737	100%
8	Harks, T., Kleinert, I., Klimm, M., and Mohring, R...	2015	3	2	2.0	0.025	0.737	100%
9	Maheshwari, C., Kulkarni, K., Pai, D., Yang, J., W... (self)	2024	3	2	6.0	0.025	0.737	100%
10	Goodwin, P	1990	2	2	1.5	0.016	0.644	100%
11	Karakostas, G. and Kolliopoulos, S. G	2004	2	2	3.0	0.016	0.644	100%
12	Harks, T. and Schwarz, J	2023	2	2	3.0	0.016	0.644	100%
13	Gunn, H	2001	2	2	3.0	0.016	0.644	100%
14	Waters, W. G	1994	2	2	3.0	0.016	0.644	100%
15	Thomas, T. C. and Thompson, G. I	1970	2	2	3.0	0.016	0.644	100%
16	Roughgarden, T	2010	2	2	1.5	0.016	0.644	100%
17	Colini-Baldeschi, R., Cominetti, R., Mertikopoulos...	2020	2	2	3.0	0.016	0.644	100%
18	Cominetti, R., Dose, V., and Scarsini, M	2021	2	2	3.0	0.016	0.644	100%
19	Nakamura, K. and Kockelman, K. M	2002	2	2	2.5	0.016	0.644	100%
20	Barnes, I. C., Frick, K. T., Deakin, E., and Skaba...	2012	2	2	2.5	0.016	0.644	100%
21	Depillis, L., Lieberman, R., and Chapman, C	2023	2	2	4.0	0.016	0.644	100%
22	Jalota, D., Solovey, K., Gopalakrishnan, K., Zoepf...	2021	3	1	1.5	0.025	0.585	100%
23	Arnott, R. and Small, K	1994	2	1	1.0	0.016	0.511	100%
24	Adler, J. L. and Cetin, M	2001	2	1	1.0	0.016	0.511	100%
25	Jalota, D., Solovey, K., Tsao, M., Zoepf, S., and ...	2023	2	1	1.0	0.016	0.511	100%
26	Craik, L. and Balakrishnan, H	2023	1	1	1.0	0.008	0.406	100%
27	Phang, S.-Y. and Toh, R. S	2004	1	1	1.0	0.008	0.406	100%
28	Percoco, M	2015	1	1	1.0	0.008	0.406	100%
29	Eliasson, J. and Mattsson, L.-G	2006	1	1	1.0	0.008	0.406	100%
30	Liu, J	2020	1	1	1.0	0.008	0.406	100%
31	LeBeau, P	2019	1	1	1.0	0.008	0.406	100%
32	Zhang, K. and Batterman, S	2013	1	1	1.0	0.008	0.406	100%
33	Han, L., Peng, C., and Xu, Z	2022	1	1	1.0	0.008	0.406	100%
34	DeCorla-Souza, P	2008	1	1	1.0	0.008	0.406	100%
35	Gemici, K., Koutsoupias, E., Monnot, B., Papadimit...	2018	1	1	1.0	0.008	0.406	100%
36	Beckmann, M., McGuire, C. B., and Winsten, C. B	1956	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
37	Smith, M	1979	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
38	Yang, H. and Lam, W. H (self)	1996	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
39	Brotcorne, L., Labbe, M., Marcotte, P., and Savard...	2001	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
40	Ferrari, P	2002	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
41	Labbe, M., Marcotte, P., and Savard, G	1998	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
42	Larsson, T. and Patriksson, M	1998	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
43	Lim, A. C	2002	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
44	Patriksson, M. and Rockafellar, R. T	2002	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
45	Verhoef, E. T	2002	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
46	Lawphongpanich, S. and Hearn, D. W	2004	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
47	Ekstrom, J., Engelson, L., and Rydergren, C	2009	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
48	Kalashnikov, V. V., Herrera Maldonado, R. C., Cama...	2016	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
49	Feng, R., Zhang, H., Shi, B., Zhong, Q., and Yao, ...	2023	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
50	Lazar, D. A. and Pedarsani, R	2021	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
51	Lazar, D. A. and Pedarsani, R	2020	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
52	Mehr, N. and Horowitz, R	2019	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
53	Brown, P. N. and Marden, J. R	2016	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
54	Goodwin, P. B	1989	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
55	Daganzo, C. F	1995	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
56	Zhu, D.-L., Yang, H., Li, C.-M., and Wang, X.-L (self)	2015	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
57	Lin, X., Yin, Y., and He, F	2021	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
58	Dogterom, N., Ettema, D., and Dijst, M	2017	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
59	Nie, Y. M	2012	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
60	Wu, D., Yin, Y., Lawphongpanich, S., and Yang, H (self)	2012	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
61	Bernstein, D	1993	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
62	Eliasson, J	2001	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
63	Lawphongpanich, S. and Yin, Y	2007	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
64	Song, Z., Yin, Y., and Lawphongpanich, S	2009	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
65	Lawphongpanich, S. and Yin, Y	2010	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
66	Jahn, O., Mohring, R. H., Schulz, A. S., and Stier...	2005	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
67	Angelelli, E., Arsik, I., Morandi, V., Savelsbergh...	2016	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
68	Angelelli, E., Morandi, V., Savelsbergh, M., and S...	2021	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
69	Wollenstein-Betech, S., Sun, C., Zhang, J., and Pa...	2019	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
70	Bertsimas, D., Gupta, V., and Paschalidis, I. C	2015	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
71	Zhang, J., Pourazarm, S., Cassandras, C. G., and P...	2016	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
72	Frick, K. T., Heminger, S., and Dittmar, H	1996	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
73	Zhang, L., Du, H., and Lee, L	2011	1	1	0.5	0.008	0.406	100%
74	Marcotte, P. and Zhu, D	2009	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
75	Manual, T. A	1964	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
76	Palmquist, R., Phaneuf, D., and Smith, V. K	2007	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
77	Meunier, D. and Quinet, E	2015	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
78	Gonzales, E. J. and Christofa, E	2015	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
79	Youn, H., Gastner, M. T., and Jeong, H	2008	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
80	O'Hare, S. J., Connors, R. D., and Watling, D. P	2016	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%
81	Monnot, B., Benita, F., and Piliouras, G	2017	1	1	2.0	0.008	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Guo, X. and Yang, H (self)

2010

6.5

0.049

1.000

100%

Yang, H. and Huang, H.-J (self)

2005

4.5

0.033

0.928

100%

Hoefer, M., Olbrich, L., and Skopalik, A

2008

4.0

0.033

0.928

100%

Bonifaci, V., Salek, M., and Schafer, G

2011

4.0

0.033

0.928

100%

Athira, I., Muneera, C., Krishnamurthy, K., and An...

2016

5.0

0.025

0.843

100%

Small, K. A

1992

2.0

0.025

0.737

100%

Fleischer, L., Jain, K., and Mahdian, M

2004

5.0

0.025

0.737

100%

Harks, T., Kleinert, I., Klimm, M., and Mohring, R...

2015

2.0

0.025

0.737

100%

Maheshwari, C., Kulkarni, K., Pai, D., Yang, J., W... (self)

2024

6.0

0.025

0.737

100%

Goodwin, P

1990

1.5

0.016

0.644

100%

Karakostas, G. and Kolliopoulos, S. G

2004

3.0

0.016

0.644

100%

Harks, T. and Schwarz, J

2023

3.0

0.016

0.644

100%

Gunn, H

2001

3.0

0.016

0.644

100%

Waters, W. G

1994

3.0

0.016

0.644

100%

Thomas, T. C. and Thompson, G. I

1970

3.0

0.016

0.644

100%

Roughgarden, T

2010

1.5

0.016

0.644

100%

Colini-Baldeschi, R., Cominetti, R., Mertikopoulos...

2020

3.0

0.016

0.644

100%

Cominetti, R., Dose, V., and Scarsini, M

2021

3.0

0.016

0.644

100%

Nakamura, K. and Kockelman, K. M

2002

2.5

0.016

0.644

100%

Barnes, I. C., Frick, K. T., Deakin, E., and Skaba...

2012

2.5

0.016

0.644

100%

Depillis, L., Lieberman, R., and Chapman, C

2023

4.0

0.016

0.644

100%

Jalota, D., Solovey, K., Gopalakrishnan, K., Zoepf...

2021

1.5

0.025

0.585

100%

Arnott, R. and Small, K

1994

1.0

0.016

0.511

100%

Adler, J. L. and Cetin, M

2001

1.0

0.016

0.511

100%

Jalota, D., Solovey, K., Tsao, M., Zoepf, S., and ...

2023

1.0

0.016

0.511

100%

Craik, L. and Balakrishnan, H

2023

1.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Phang, S.-Y. and Toh, R. S

2004

1.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Percoco, M

2015

1.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Eliasson, J. and Mattsson, L.-G

2006

1.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Liu, J

2020

1.0

0.008

0.406

100%

LeBeau, P

2019

1.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Zhang, K. and Batterman, S

2013

1.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Han, L., Peng, C., and Xu, Z

2022

1.0

0.008

0.406

100%

DeCorla-Souza, P

2008

1.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Gemici, K., Koutsoupias, E., Monnot, B., Papadimit...

2018

1.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Beckmann, M., McGuire, C. B., and Winsten, C. B

1956

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Smith, M

1979

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Yang, H. and Lam, W. H (self)

1996

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Brotcorne, L., Labbe, M., Marcotte, P., and Savard...

2001

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Ferrari, P

2002

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Labbe, M., Marcotte, P., and Savard, G

1998

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Larsson, T. and Patriksson, M

1998

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Lim, A. C

2002

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Patriksson, M. and Rockafellar, R. T

2002

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Verhoef, E. T

2002

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Lawphongpanich, S. and Hearn, D. W

2004

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Ekstrom, J., Engelson, L., and Rydergren, C

2009

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Kalashnikov, V. V., Herrera Maldonado, R. C., Cama...

2016

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Feng, R., Zhang, H., Shi, B., Zhong, Q., and Yao, ...

2023

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Lazar, D. A. and Pedarsani, R

2021

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Lazar, D. A. and Pedarsani, R

2020

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Mehr, N. and Horowitz, R

2019

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Brown, P. N. and Marden, J. R

2016

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Goodwin, P. B

1989

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Daganzo, C. F

1995

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Zhu, D.-L., Yang, H., Li, C.-M., and Wang, X.-L (self)

2015

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Lin, X., Yin, Y., and He, F

2021

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Dogterom, N., Ettema, D., and Dijst, M

2017

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Nie, Y. M

2012

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Wu, D., Yin, Y., Lawphongpanich, S., and Yang, H (self)

2012

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Bernstein, D

1993

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Eliasson, J

2001

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Lawphongpanich, S. and Yin, Y

2007

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Song, Z., Yin, Y., and Lawphongpanich, S

2009

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Lawphongpanich, S. and Yin, Y

2010

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Jahn, O., Mohring, R. H., Schulz, A. S., and Stier...

2005

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Angelelli, E., Arsik, I., Morandi, V., Savelsbergh...

2016

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Angelelli, E., Morandi, V., Savelsbergh, M., and S...

2021

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Wollenstein-Betech, S., Sun, C., Zhang, J., and Pa...

2019

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Bertsimas, D., Gupta, V., and Paschalidis, I. C

2015

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Zhang, J., Pourazarm, S., Cassandras, C. G., and P...

2016

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Frick, K. T., Heminger, S., and Dittmar, H

1996

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Zhang, L., Du, H., and Lee, L

2011

0.5

0.008

0.406

100%

Marcotte, P. and Zhu, D

2009

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Manual, T. A

1964

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Palmquist, R., Phaneuf, D., and Smith, V. K

2007

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Meunier, D. and Quinet, E

2015

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Gonzales, E. J. and Christofa, E

2015

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Youn, H., Gastner, M. T., and Jeong, H

2008

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

O'Hare, S. J., Connors, R. D., and Watling, D. P

2016

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Monnot, B., Benita, F., and Piliouras, G

2017

2.0

0.008

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.