Citation Analysis – Testing the Exogeneity of Instrumental Variables and Regressors in Linear Regression Models Using Copulas

Testing the Exogeneity of Instrumental Variables and Regressors in Linear Regression Models Using Copulas
Seyed Morteza Emadi
https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.15253

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

4,366

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Angrist, Joshua D and Krueger, Alan B	1991	6	3	8.0	0.122	0.874	67%
2	Park, Sungho and Gupta, Sachin	2012	4	2	5.0	0.082	0.811	100%
3	Wooldridge, Jeffrey M	2010	3	2	4.0	0.061	0.737	100%
4	Yang, Fan and Qian, Yi and Xie, Hui	2022	3	2	4.0	0.061	0.737	100%
5	Kiviet, Jan F	2020	4	1	4.0	0.082	0.644	100%
6	Kleibergen, Frank and Zivot, Eric	2003	2	2	3.0	0.041	0.644	100%
7	Ebbes, Peter and Wedel, Michel and Bo	2005	2	2	3.0	0.041	0.644	100%
8	Rossi, Peter E and Allenby, Greg M	2003	2	2	3.0	0.041	0.644	100%
9	Durbin, J	1954	2	2	3.0	0.041	0.644	100%
10	Hausman, Jerry A	1978	2	2	3.0	0.041	0.644	100%
11	Wu, De-Min	1973	2	2	3.0	0.041	0.644	100%
12	Kitagawa, Toru	2015	2	1	2.0	0.041	0.511	100%
13	Caetano, Carolina	2015	2	1	2.0	0.041	0.511	100%
14	Angrist, Joshua D and Imbens, Guido W and Rubin, D...	1996	1	1	1.0	0.020	0.406	100%
15	Dufour, Jean-Marie	2003	1	1	1.0	0.020	0.406	100%
16	Bound, John and Jaeger, David A and Baker, Regina ...	1995	1	1	1.0	0.020	0.406	100%
17	Ashley, Richard	2009	1	1	1.0	0.020	0.406	100%
18	Kraay, Aart	2012	1	1	1.0	0.020	0.406	100%
19	Nevo, Aviv and Rosen, Adam M	2012	1	1	1.0	0.020	0.406	100%
20	Sargan, John D	1958	1	1	1.0	0.020	0.406	100%
21	Hansen, Lars Peter	1982	1	1	1.0	0.020	0.406	100%
22	Deaton, Angus	2010	1	1	1.0	0.020	0.406	100%
23	Parente, Paulo MDC and Silva, JMC Santos	2012	1	1	1.0	0.020	0.406	100%
24	Kripfganz, Sebastian and Kiviet, Jan F	2021	1	1	1.0	0.020	0.406	100%
25	Sklar, M	1959	1	1	2.0	0.020	0.406	100%
26	DeGroot, Morris H. and Schervish, Mark J.	2011	1	1	2.0	0.020	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Angrist, Joshua D and Krueger, Alan B

1991

8.0

0.122

0.874

67%

Park, Sungho and Gupta, Sachin

2012

5.0

0.082

0.811

100%

Wooldridge, Jeffrey M

2010

4.0

0.061

0.737

100%

Yang, Fan and Qian, Yi and Xie, Hui

2022

4.0

0.061

0.737

100%

Kiviet, Jan F

2020

4.0

0.082

0.644

100%

Kleibergen, Frank and Zivot, Eric

2003

3.0

0.041

0.644

100%

Ebbes, Peter and Wedel, Michel and Bo

2005

3.0

0.041

0.644

100%

Rossi, Peter E and Allenby, Greg M

2003

3.0

0.041

0.644

100%

Durbin, J

1954

3.0

0.041

0.644

100%

Hausman, Jerry A

1978

3.0

0.041

0.644

100%

Wu, De-Min

1973

3.0

0.041

0.644

100%

Kitagawa, Toru

2015

2.0

0.041

0.511

100%

Caetano, Carolina

2015

2.0

0.041

0.511

100%

Angrist, Joshua D and Imbens, Guido W and Rubin, D...

1996

1.0

0.020

0.406

100%

Dufour, Jean-Marie

2003

1.0

0.020

0.406

100%

Bound, John and Jaeger, David A and Baker, Regina ...

1995

1.0

0.020

0.406

100%

Ashley, Richard

2009

1.0

0.020

0.406

100%

Kraay, Aart

2012

1.0

0.020

0.406

100%

Nevo, Aviv and Rosen, Adam M

2012

1.0

0.020

0.406

100%

Sargan, John D

1958

1.0

0.020

0.406

100%

Hansen, Lars Peter

1982

1.0

0.020

0.406

100%

Deaton, Angus

2010

1.0

0.020

0.406

100%

Parente, Paulo MDC and Silva, JMC Santos

2012

1.0

0.020

0.406

100%

Kripfganz, Sebastian and Kiviet, Jan F

2021

1.0

0.020

0.406

100%

Sklar, M

1959

2.0

0.020

0.406

100%

DeGroot, Morris H. and Schervish, Mark J.

2011

2.0

0.020

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.