Citation Analysis

Interpreting Event-Studies from Recent Difference-in-Differences Methods
Jonathan Roth
https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.12309
30
Citation mentions
17
Cited references
6
Sections
2,185
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Rambachan, Ashesh and Roth, Jonathan (self) 2023 4 2 7.0 0.133 0.811 100%
2 Roth, Jonathan (self) 2022 2 2 3.0 0.067 0.644 100%
3 Sun, Liyang and Abraham, Sarah 2021 2 2 3.0 0.067 0.644 100%
4 de Chaisemartin, Clément and D'Haultfoe 2020 2 2 3.0 0.067 0.644 100%
5 Liu, Licheng and Wang, Ye and Xu, Yiqing 2024 2 2 4.0 0.067 0.644 100%
6 Gardner, John 2021 2 2 4.0 0.067 0.644 100%
7 Liu, Ziyi 2025 4 1 8.0 0.133 0.644 100%
8 Li, Zikai and Strezhnev, Anton 2025 3 2 3.0 0.100 0.511 33%
9 Simon Freyaldenhoven and Christian Hansen and Jorg... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.033 0.406 100%
10 de Chaisemartin, Clément and D'Haultfoe 2022 1 1 1.0 0.033 0.406 100%
11 Roth, Jonathan and Sant’Anna, Pedro H. C. and Bili... (self) 2023 1 1 1.0 0.033 0.406 100%
12 Callaway, Brantly and Sant’Anna, Pedro H. C. 2021 1 1 1.0 0.033 0.406 100%
13 Borusyak, Kirill and Jaravel, Xavier and Spiess, J... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.033 0.406 100%
14 Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2025 1 1 2.0 0.033 0.406 100%
15 Manski, Charles F. and Pepper, John V. 2018 1 1 2.0 0.033 0.406 100%
16 Callaway, Brantly 2021 1 1 2.0 0.033 0.406 100%
17 Bilinski, Alyssa and Hatfield, Laura A. 2018 1 1 2.0 0.033 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.