← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Assessing the impact of forced and voluntary behavioral changes on economic-epidemiological co-dynamics
Tijs W. Alleman, Jan M. Baetens
https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.08442
194
Citation mentions
73
Cited references
12
Sections
19,166
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Ludvigsson, Jonas F 6 4 11.0 0.031 1.000 100%
2 Bavel, Jay J. Van and Baicker, Katherine and Boggi... 2020 6 5 11.0 0.031 1.000 100%
3 Tijs W. Alleman and Michiel Rollier and Jenna Verg... (self) 2023 13 7 25.0 0.067 1.000 100%
4 Anton Pichler and Marco Pangallo and R. Maria del ... 2022 16 6 29.0 0.082 1.000 100%
5 Tijs W. Alleman and Koen Schoors and Jan M. Baeten... (self) 2023 8 6 15.0 0.041 1.000 100%
6 Tijs W. Alleman and Jenna Vergeynst and Lander De ... (self) 2021 12 4 24.0 0.062 1.000 100%
7 Haw, David J. and Forchini, Giovanni and Doohan, P... 2022 5 3 9.0 0.026 1.000 100%
8 Béraud, Guillaume AND Kazmercziak, Sabine AND Beut... 2015 13 5 25.0 0.067 1.000 100%
9 Karima R. Nigmatulina and Richard C. Larson 2009 4 3 7.0 0.021 0.928 100%
10 Arthur, Ronan F. AND Jones, James H. AND Bonds, Ma... 2021 4 3 8.0 0.021 0.928 100%
11 Eurostat 4 3 8.0 0.021 0.928 100%
12 Socialstyrelsen 4 3 8.0 0.021 0.928 100%
13 National Bank of Belgium 4 4 8.0 0.021 0.928 100%
14 Luyten, Jeroen and Schokkaert, Erik 3 3 5.0 0.015 0.843 100%
15 Tijs W. Alleman and Christian V. Stevens and Jan M... (self) 2023 3 3 5.0 0.015 0.843 100%
16 Sciensano 3 3 6.0 0.015 0.843 100%
17 Basselier, R. and Minne, G. 2021 3 3 6.0 0.015 0.843 100%
18 Van Kerckhove, Kim and Hens, Niel and Edmunds, W J... 3 2 6.0 0.015 0.737 100%
19 Statbel 3 2 6.0 0.015 0.737 100%
20 Mossong, Jo\"e 2008 3 2 6.0 0.015 0.737 100%
21 Alleman, Tijs W and Torfs, Elena and Nopens, Ingma... (self) 2020 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
22 Liu, Hengcong and Zheng, Muhua and Wu, Dayu and Wa... 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
23 Lacitignola, Deborah and Saccomandi, Giuseppe 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
24 Gavenčiak, Tomáš AND Monrad, Joshua Teperowski AND... 2022 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
25 Central Bureau of Statistics 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
26 National Bank of Belgium 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
27 Central Bureau of Statistics 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
28 Goodman 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
29 Foreman-Mackey 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
30 Krisinformation.se 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
31 Central Bureau of Statistics 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
32 Central Bureau of Statistics 2 2 4.0 0.010 0.644 100%
33 Verbeeck, Johan and Vandersmissen, Godelieve and P... 3 1 6.0 0.015 0.585 100%
34 Google LLC 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
35 Anton Pichler and Marco Pangallo and R. Maria del ... 2020 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
36 He, Xi and Lau, Eric H Y and Wu, Peng and Deng, Xi... 2020 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
37 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
38 Central Bureau of Statistics 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
39 Michiel Rollier and Gisele H.B. Miranda and Jenna ... (self) 2023 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
40 Nelder, J. A. and Mead, R. 1965 2 1 4.0 0.010 0.511 100%
41 Buonomo, Bruno and Della Marca, Rossella 2020 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
42 Yan, Youpei and Malik, Amyn A and Bayham, Jude and... 1 1 1.0 0.005 0.406 100%
43 White, K. Geoffrey 2001 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
44 Ludvigsson, Jonas F. 2023 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
45 Str\aa 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
46 Yarmol-Matusiak, Erica A and Cipriano, Lauren E an... 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
47 Vandepitte, Sophie and Alleman, Tijs and Nopens, I... (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
48 Kucharski, Adam J. and Klepac, Petra and Conlan, A... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
49 Danilo Cereda and Mattia Manica and Marcello Tiran... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
50 Eurostat 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
51 Central Bureau of Statistics 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
52 Statbel 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
53 Statbel 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
54 Eames, Ken T. D. AND Tilston, Natasha L. AND Brook... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
55 Leung, Kathy and Jit, Mark and Lau, Eric H. Y. and... 2017 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
56 Verelst, Frederik and Hermans, Lisa and Vercruysse... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
57 Li, Qun and Guan, Xuhua and Wu, Peng and Wang, Xia... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
58 Wei, Wycliffe E. and Li, Zongbin and Chiew, Calvin... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
59 Poletti, Piero and Tirani, Marcello and Cereda, Da... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
60 Viner, Russell M and Mytton, Oliver T and Bonell, ... 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
61 Martinez, Micaela Elvira 2018 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
62 Liu, Xiaoyue and Huang, Jianping and Li, Changyu a... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
63 US Congressional Budget Office 2006 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
64 Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Develop... 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
65 National Bank of Belgium Online Statistics 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
66 Central Bureau of Statistics 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
67 Christine Arriola and Charles Cadestin and Przemys... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
68 Anton Pichler and J. Doyne Farmer 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
69 Ash, Thomas and Bento, Antonio M. and Kaffine, Dan... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
70 Davide Fiorello and Angelo Martino and Loredana Za... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
71 Hartig, Florian and Calabrese, Justin M. and Reine... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
72 Arthur E. Hoerl and Robert W. Kennard 1970 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
73 Europese Commissie and Directoraat-generaal Begrot... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.005 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.