Citation Analysis – Robust Analysis of Short Panels

Robust Analysis of Short Panels
Andrew Chesher, Adam M. Rosen, Yuanqi Zhang
https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06611

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

4,064

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Aristodemou	2021	7	5	12.5	0.109	1.000	100%
2	Chesher and Rosen (self)	2017	3	3	5.0	0.047	0.843	100%
3	Honore, Muris, and Weidner	2023	3	2	3.0	0.047	0.737	100%
4	Chamberlain	2010	2	2	2.5	0.031	0.644	100%
5	Honore and De Paula	2021	2	2	2.5	0.031	0.644	100%
6	Beresteanu, Molchanov, and Molinari	2011	2	2	4.0	0.031	0.644	100%
7	Molinari	2020	2	2	4.0	0.031	0.644	100%
8	Chesher, Rosen, and Smolinski (self)	2013	2	2	4.0	0.031	0.644	100%
9	Neyman and Scott	1948	2	1	2.0	0.031	0.511	100%
10	Honore and Weidner	2022	2	1	1.0	0.031	0.511	100%
11	Chernozhukov, Fernandez-Val, Hahn, and Newey	2013	2	1	1.0	0.031	0.511	100%
12	Lancaster	2000	1	1	1.0	0.016	0.406	100%
13	Rasch	1960	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
14	Rasch	1961	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
15	Andersen	1970	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
16	Honore and Kyriazidou	2000	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
17	Honore and Kyriazidou	2019	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
18	Honore and Tamer	2006	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
19	Dobronyi, Gu, and Kim	2021	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
20			1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
21	Kitazawa	2022	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
22	Bonhomme, Dano, and Graham	2023	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
23	Dano	2023	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
24			1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
25	Bonhomme	2012	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
26	Manski	1987	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
27	Shi, Shum, and Song	2018	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
28	Gao and Li	2020	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
29	Khan, Ouyang, and Tamer	2021	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
30	Pakes, Porter, Shepard, and Calder-Wang	2021	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
31	Pakes and Porter	2022	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
32	Dobronyi, Ouyang, and Yang	2023	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
33	Khan, Ponomareva, and Tamer	2023	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
34	Mbakop	2023	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
35	Honore and Hu	2002	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
36	Hu	2002	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
37	Khan, Ponomareva, and Tamer	2016	1	1	0.5	0.016	0.406	100%
38	Chesher and Rosen (self)	2020	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
39	Artstein	1983	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
40	Luo and Wang	2018	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
41	Ponomarev	2022	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
42	Wolfram Research, Inc.	2023	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
43	Chesher and Smolinski (self)	2012	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
44	Chesher, Rosen, and Siddique (self)	2023	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
45	Tamer	2003	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%
46	Chesher, Kim, and Rosen (self)	2023	1	1	2.0	0.016	0.406	100%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Aristodemou

2021

12.5

0.109

1.000

100%

Chesher and Rosen (self)

2017

5.0

0.047

0.843

100%

Honore, Muris, and Weidner

2023

3.0

0.047

0.737

100%

Chamberlain

2010

2.5

0.031

0.644

100%

Honore and De Paula

2021

2.5

0.031

0.644

100%

Beresteanu, Molchanov, and Molinari

2011

4.0

0.031

0.644

100%

Molinari

2020

4.0

0.031

0.644

100%

Chesher, Rosen, and Smolinski (self)

2013

4.0

0.031

0.644

100%

Neyman and Scott

1948

2.0

0.031

0.511

100%

Honore and Weidner

2022

1.0

0.031

0.511

100%

Chernozhukov, Fernandez-Val, Hahn, and Newey

2013

1.0

0.031

0.511

100%

Lancaster

2000

1.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Rasch

1960

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Rasch

1961

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Andersen

1970

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Honore and Kyriazidou

2000

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Honore and Kyriazidou

2019

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Honore and Tamer

2006

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Dobronyi, Gu, and Kim

2021

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Kitazawa

2022

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Bonhomme, Dano, and Graham

2023

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Dano

2023

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Bonhomme

2012

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Manski

1987

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Shi, Shum, and Song

2018

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Gao and Li

2020

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Khan, Ouyang, and Tamer

2021

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Pakes, Porter, Shepard, and Calder-Wang

2021

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Pakes and Porter

2022

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Dobronyi, Ouyang, and Yang

2023

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Khan, Ponomareva, and Tamer

2023

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Mbakop

2023

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Honore and Hu

2002

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

2002

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Khan, Ponomareva, and Tamer

2016

0.5

0.016

0.406

100%

Chesher and Rosen (self)

2020

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Artstein

1983

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Luo and Wang

2018

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Ponomarev

2022

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Wolfram Research, Inc.

2023

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Chesher and Smolinski (self)

2012

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Chesher, Rosen, and Siddique (self)

2023

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Tamer

2003

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Chesher, Kim, and Rosen (self)

2023

2.0

0.016

0.406

100%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.