Citation Analysis – Robust Bayesian Method for Refutable Models

Robust Bayesian Method for Refutable Models
Moyu Liao
https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.04512

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

9,218

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Giacomini, R. and T. Kitagawa	2021	9	4	13.0	0.125	1.000	100%
2	Liao, M (self)	2024	8	5	14.5	0.111	0.957	88%
3	Kitagawa, T	2015	5	4	6.5	0.069	0.928	80%
4	Imbens, G. and J. Angrist	1994	4	3	6.0	0.056	0.928	100%
5	Christensen, T. and B. Connault	2023	13	3	19.0	0.181	0.885	69%
6	Ghosal, S. and A. Van der Vaart	2017	6	5	9.0	0.083	0.874	67%
7	Mourifie, I. and Y. Wan	2017	3	2	5.0	0.042	0.737	100%
8	Card, D	1993	2	2	3.0	0.028	0.644	100%
9	De Chaisemartin, C	2017	2	2	3.0	0.028	0.644	100%
10	Dahl, C. M., M. Huber, and G. Mellace	2023	2	2	4.0	0.028	0.644	100%
11	Masten, M. A. and A. Poirier	2021	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
12	Bonhomme, S. and M. Weidner	2022	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
13	Giacomini, R., T. Kitagawa, and M. Read	2022	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
14	DeRoberts, L. and J. A. Hartigan	1981	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
15	Berger, J. and L. M. Berliner	1986	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
16	Wasserman, L. A	1989	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
17	Wasserman, L. and J. B. Kadane	1992	1	1	1.0	0.014	0.406	100%
18	Kitagawa, T	2021	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
19	Andrews, D. W. and G. Soares	2010	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
20	Koopmans, T. C. and O. Reiersol	1950	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
21	Jovanovic, B	1989	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
22	Manski, C. F. and J. V. Pepper	1998	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
23	Chernozhukov, V., S. Lee, and A. M. Rosen	2013	1	1	2.0	0.014	0.406	100%
24	Manski, C. F. and J. V. Pepper	2000	2	1	1.0	0.028	0.110	0%
25	Hsu, Y.-C., C.-A. Liu, and X. Shi	2019	2	1	1.0	0.028	0.110	0%
26	Manski, C. F	2019	1	1	0.5	0.014	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Giacomini, R. and T. Kitagawa

2021

13.0

0.125

1.000

100%

Liao, M (self)

2024

14.5

0.111

0.957

88%

Kitagawa, T

2015

6.5

0.069

0.928

80%

Imbens, G. and J. Angrist

1994

6.0

0.056

0.928

100%

Christensen, T. and B. Connault

2023

19.0

0.181

0.885

69%

Ghosal, S. and A. Van der Vaart

2017

9.0

0.083

0.874

67%

Mourifie, I. and Y. Wan

2017

5.0

0.042

0.737

100%

Card, D

1993

3.0

0.028

0.644

100%

De Chaisemartin, C

2017

3.0

0.028

0.644

100%

Dahl, C. M., M. Huber, and G. Mellace

2023

4.0

0.028

0.644

100%

Masten, M. A. and A. Poirier

2021

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Bonhomme, S. and M. Weidner

2022

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Giacomini, R., T. Kitagawa, and M. Read

2022

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

DeRoberts, L. and J. A. Hartigan

1981

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Berger, J. and L. M. Berliner

1986

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Wasserman, L. A

1989

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Wasserman, L. and J. B. Kadane

1992

1.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Kitagawa, T

2021

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Andrews, D. W. and G. Soares

2010

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Koopmans, T. C. and O. Reiersol

1950

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Jovanovic, B

1989

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Manski, C. F. and J. V. Pepper

1998

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Chernozhukov, V., S. Lee, and A. M. Rosen

2013

2.0

0.014

0.406

100%

Manski, C. F. and J. V. Pepper

2000

1.0

0.028

0.110

Hsu, Y.-C., C.-A. Liu, and X. Shi

2019

1.0

0.028

0.110

Manski, C. F

2019

0.5

0.014

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.