Citation Analysis

Teacher bias or measurement error?
Thomas van Huizen, Madelon Jacobs, Matthijs Oosterveen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.04200
67
Citation mentions
42
Cited references
11
Sections
7,330
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Hyslop, Dean R and Imbens, Guido W 2001 4 4 7.0 0.060 0.928 100%
2 Ferman, Bruno and Fontes, Luiz Felipe 2022 4 4 7.0 0.060 0.928 100%
3 Gillen, Ben and Snowberg, Erik and Yariv, Leeat 2019 3 3 5.0 0.045 0.843 100%
4 Cito 2017 3 3 6.0 0.045 0.843 100%
5 Jacob, Brian and Rothstein, Jesse 2016 3 2 5.0 0.045 0.737 100%
6 WVO 2014 2 2 3.0 0.030 0.644 100%
7 de Ree, Joppe and Oosterveen, Matthijs and Webbink... (self) 2023 2 2 3.0 0.030 0.644 100%
8 Eggen, Theo and Sanders, Piet 1993 2 2 3.0 0.030 0.644 100%
9 Warm, Thomas A 1989 2 2 3.0 0.030 0.644 100%
10 Botelho, Fernando and Madeira, Ricardo A and Range... 2015 2 2 3.0 0.030 0.644 100%
11 Zhu, Maria 2024 2 2 3.0 0.030 0.644 100%
12 Falk, Armin and Kosse, Fabian and Pinger, Pia 2025 3 1 3.0 0.045 0.585 100%
13 Alesina, Alberto and Carlana, Michela and La Ferra... 2024 2 1 2.0 0.030 0.511 100%
14 Burgess, Simon and Greaves, Ellen 2013 2 1 2.0 0.030 0.511 100%
15 Zumbuehl, Maria and Chehber, Nihal and Dillingh, R... 2025 2 1 2.0 0.030 0.511 100%
16 Carlana, Michela and La Ferrara, Eliana and Pinott... 2022 2 1 2.0 0.030 0.511 100%
17 Modalsli, J\o 2024 2 1 2.0 0.030 0.511 100%
18 Hausman, Jerry 2001 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
19 Fuller, Wayne A 2009 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
20 Matthewes, So 2021 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
21 Dustmann, Christian and Puhani, Patrick A and Scho 2017 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
22 Borghans, Lex and Diris, Ron and Smits, Wendy and ... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
23 Carlana, Michela 2019 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
24 Papageorge, Nicholas W and Gershenson, Seth and Ka... 2020 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
25 Inspectorate of Education 2016 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
26 Schennach, Susanne M 2016 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
27 Borjas, George J and Hamermesh, Daniel S 2024 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
28 Cornwell, Christopher and Mustard, David B and Van... 2013 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
29 Lavy, Victor and Sand, Edith 2018 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
30 Terrier, Camille 2020 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
31 WPO 2014 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
32 Inspectorate of Education 2019 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
33 Ministry of Education 2023 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
34 DUO 2023 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
35 Haelermans, Carla and Huijgen, Timo and Jacobs, Ma... (self) 2020 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
36 Imai, Kosuke and Jiang, Zhichao 2023 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
37 Kelley, Truman Lee 1947 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
38 Junker, Brian and Schofield, Lynne Steuerle and Ta... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
39 Pei, Zhuan and Pischke, Jo 2019 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
40 GMAT 2023 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
41 ETS 2023 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
42 College Board 2013 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.