← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Changes-in-Changes for Ordered Choice Models: \\ Too Many ``False Zeros''?
Daniel Gutknecht, Cenchen Liu
https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.00618
81
Citation mentions
47
Cited references
6
Sections
7,068
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Athey, S. and Imbens, G. 2006 9 5 15.0 0.111 1.000 100%
2 Brown, Sarah and Harris, Mark N and Srivastava, Pr... 2018 3 3 5.0 0.037 0.843 100%
3 Nguimkeu, P. and Denteh, A. and Tchernis, R. 2019 3 3 5.0 0.037 0.843 100%
4 Hollingworth, A. and Wing, C. and Bradford, A.C. 2022 4 2 7.0 0.049 0.811 100%
5 Roth, J. and Sant'Anna, P. 2023 3 2 5.0 0.037 0.737 100%
6 Greene, William and Harris, Mark N. and Srivastava... 2018 3 2 6.0 0.037 0.737 100%
7 Wooldridge, Jeffrey M 2023 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
8 Mondal, O. and Wang, R. 2024 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
9 Hausman, J. and Abrevaya, J. and Scott-Morten, F.M... 1998 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
10 Lewbel, Arthur 2000 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
11 Han, S. and Vytlacil, E.J. 2017 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
12 Arellano, M. and Bonhomme, S. 2017 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
13 Pereda-Fernández, Santiago 2023 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
14 Anderson, D. M. and Hansen, B. and Rees, D. I. 2015 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
15 Wen, H. and Hockenberry, J. M. and Cummings, J. R. 2015 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
16 Cerd\'a 2017 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
17 Williams, J. and Bretteville-Jensen, A. L. 2014 2 2 3.0 0.025 0.644 100%
18 Klein, Roger W. and Sherman, Robert P. 2002 2 2 4.0 0.025 0.644 100%
19 Klein, Roger and Shen, Chan and Vella, Francis 2015 2 2 4.0 0.025 0.644 100%
20 Poirier, Dale J. 1980 2 2 4.0 0.025 0.644 100%
21 Caudill, Steven B. and Mixon, Franklin G. 2005 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Puhani, P.A. 2012 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Arulampalam, Wiji and Corradi, Valentina and Gutkn... (self) 2017 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 Mourifi\'e 2014 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 Fox, J.T. and Kim, K. and Ryan, S.P. and Bajari, P... 2012 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 Fox, J.T. and Gandhi, A. 2016 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Assun\cc 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Huber, M. and Schelker, M. and Strittmatter, A. 2022 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Kim, Y.-S. and Lee, M.-J. 2017 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Mayer, C. and Morrison, E. and Piskorski, T. and G... 2014 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 Sequeira, S. 2016 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Hoekstra, M and Sloan, C.W. 2022 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 Fang, Z. and Santos, A. 2019 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Poirier, A. and Masten, M.A. 2020 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Chernozhukov, Victor and Fernández-Val, Iván and L... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Iaria, Alessandro and Wang, Ao 2022 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
37 Chamberlain, G. 1986 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
38 Lewbel, A. 2007 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
39 Corradi, V. and Gutknecht, D. (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
40 Chernozhukov, V. and Fern\'a 2013 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
41 Brinkman, J. and Mok-Lamme, D. 2019 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
42 Van Ours, J.C. and Williams, J. 2009 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
43 Moore, T.H. and Zammit, S. and Lingford-Hughes, A.... 2007 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
44 Macleod, J. and Oakes, R. and Copello, A. and Crom... 2004 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
45 Solowij, N. and Jones, K. and Rozman, M. and Davis... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
46 Pudney, S. 2010 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
47 2 1 2.0 0.025 0.110 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.