← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Decision Theory for Treatment Choice Problems \\ with Partial Identification
José Luis Montiel Olea, Chen Qiu, Jörg Stoye
https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.17623
175
Citation mentions
77
Cited references
9
Sections
12,925
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Takuya Ishihara and Toru Kitagawa 2021 16 5 27.0 0.091 1.000 100%
2 Kohei Yata 2023 13 3 21.0 0.074 1.000 100%
3 Christensen, Timothy and Moon, Hyungsik Roger and ... 2022 5 3 7.0 0.029 1.000 100%
4 Abraham Wald 1950 4 3 6.0 0.023 0.928 100%
5 Tetenov, Aleksey 2012 4 3 6.0 0.023 0.928 100%
6 Diegert, Paul and Masten, Matthew A and Poirier, A... 2022 7 2 11.0 0.040 0.874 100%
7 Charles F. Manski 2004 6 2 10.0 0.034 0.874 100%
8 Stoye, Jo (self) 2012 10 6 12.0 0.057 0.843 60%
9 Stoye, Jo (self) 2012 3 3 5.0 0.017 0.843 100%
10 Mogstad, Magne and Santos, Andres and Torgovitsky,... 2018 4 2 6.0 0.023 0.811 100%
11 Mogstad, Magne and Torgovitsky, Alexander 2018 4 2 6.0 0.023 0.811 100%
12 Hirano, Keisuke and Porter, Jack R. 2009 4 2 5.0 0.023 0.811 100%
13 L. Savage 1951 3 2 5.0 0.017 0.737 100%
14 Paul L. Canner 1970 3 2 4.0 0.017 0.737 100%
15 Stoye, Jo (self) 2009 3 2 4.0 0.017 0.737 100%
16 Heckman, James J and Vytlacil, Edward J 2005 3 2 5.0 0.017 0.737 100%
17 Manski, Charles F. and Tetenov, Aleksey 2007 3 3 4.5 0.017 0.737 67%
18 Karlin, Samuel and Rubin, Herman 1956 3 1 6.0 0.017 0.585 100%
19 D'Adamo, Riccardo 2021 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
20 Kido, Daido 2022 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
21 Mattner, Lutz 1993 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
22 2 2 2.5 0.011 0.511 50%
23 Charles F. Manski 2024 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
24 Menzel, Konrad 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
25 Dehejia 2005 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
26 Charles F. Manski 2000 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
27 Charles F. Manski 2005 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
28 Charles F. Manski 2007 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
29 Stoye, Jo (self) 2007 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
30 Aradillas Fernandez, Andres and Montiel Olea, Jose... (self) 2024 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
31 Chen, Haoning and Guggenberger, Patrik 2024 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Keisuke Hirano and Jack R. Porter 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Kitagawa, Toru and Lee, Sokbae and Qiu, Chen (self) 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Schlag, Karl H 2006 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Kido, Daido 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Debopam Bhattacharya and Pascaline Dupas 2012 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Kitagawa, Toru and Tetenov, Aleksey 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Toru Kitagawa and Aleksey Tetenov 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Eric Mbakop and Max Tabord-Meehan 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Toru Kitagawa and Guanyi Wang 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Susan Athey and Stefan Wager 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Toru Kitagawa and Shosei Sakaguchi and Aleksey Tet... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Ida, Takanori and Ishihara, Takunori and Ito, Koic... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Kallus, Nathan and Zhou, Angela 2018 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Ben-Michael, Eli and Greiner, D James and Imai, Ko... 2025 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Ben-Michael, Eli and Imai, Kosuke and Jiang, Zhich... 2024 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Adjaho, Christopher and Christensen, Timothy 2022 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Lei, Lihua and Sahoo, Roshni and Wager, Stefan 2023 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Chamberlain, Gary 2011 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Mu 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Charles F. Manski 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Andrews, Isaiah and Mikusheva, Anna 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Lehmann, Erich Leo and Romano, Joseph P 2005 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Lehmann, Erich L and Casella, George 1998 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Parmigiani, Giovanni 1992 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Evan Sadler 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 Yu, Gang and Kouvelis, Panagiotis 1995 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 Chamberlain, Gary 2000 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Aradillas Ferna 2024 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Guggenberger, Patrik and Huang, Jiaqi 2025 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Daskalakis, Constantinos and Skoulakis, Stratis an... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Charles F. Manski 2007 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Khan, M. Ali and Rath, Kali P. and Sun, Yeneng 2006 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 Charles F. Manski 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Heckman, James J and Vytlacil, Edward J 1999 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 Imbens, Guido W and Angrist, Joshua D 1994 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Bruce E. Hansen 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 Stoye, Jo (self) 2009 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Clarke, Frank H 1990 9 2 4.5 0.051 0.188 0%
70 Berger, J.O. 1985 3 2 1.5 0.017 0.159 0%
71 Rockafellar, R Tyrrell 1997 2 2 1.0 0.011 0.139 0%
72 Giacomini, Raffaella and Kitagawa, Toru 2021 3 1 1.5 0.017 0.126 0%
73 Casella, George and Berger, Roger L 2002 2 1 1.0 0.011 0.110 0%
74 Skorohod, Anatolij Vladimirovi\vc 2012 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
75 Anderson, T.W. and Rubin, H. 1949 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
76 Ferguson, T.S. 1967 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
77 Karlin, Samuel 1957 1 1 0.5 0.006 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.