Citation Analysis

\bf Direct Multi-Step Forecast based Comparison of Nested Models via an Encompassing Test
Jean-Yves Pitarakis
https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.16099
51
Citation mentions
39
Cited references
9
Sections
5,618
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Hansen, P.R., and Timmermann, A 2015 3 3 5.0 0.059 0.843 100%
2 Pitarakis, J (self) 2023 4 2 5.0 0.078 0.811 100%
3 Clark, T.E. and McCracken, M. W 2013 3 2 4.0 0.059 0.737 100%
4 Clark, T.E. and McCracken, M.W 2001 3 2 5.0 0.059 0.737 100%
5 Clark, T.E. and McCracken M.W 2005 3 2 5.0 0.059 0.737 100%
6 McCracken, M.W 2007 2 2 3.0 0.039 0.644 100%
7 Diebold, F.X., and Mariano, R 1995 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
8 West, K 1996 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
9 West, K 2006 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
10 Hendry, D.F. and Richard, J-F 1982 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
11 Mizon, G.E. and Richard, J-F 1986 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
12 Chong, Y.Y., and Hendry, D.F 1986 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
13 Harvey, D.I., Leybourne, S.J., and Newbold, P 1998 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
14 Clements, M.P. and Harvey, D.I 2009 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
15 Breitung, J., and Kn\"uppel, M 2021 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
16 Odendahl, F., Rossi, B., and Sekhposyan, T 2023 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
17 Giacomini, R. and White, H 2006 1 1 1.0 0.020 0.406 100%
18 Jorda, O 2005 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
19 Montiel Olea, J. L., and Plagborg-M\"oller, M 2021 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
20 Decrouez, G., and Hall, P 2014 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
21 Gonzalo, J. and Pitarakis, J (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
22 Phillips, P. C. B., and Solo, V 1992 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
23 Giraitis, L., Kokoszka, P., and Leipus, R 2000 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
24 Giraitis, L., Kokoszka, P. & R. Leipus 2001 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
25 Deng, A. & P. Perron 2008 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
26 Berenguer-Rico, V., and Nielsen, B 2020 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
27 Andrews, D.W.K 1991 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
28 Magdalinos, T., and Phillips, P. C. B 2009 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
29 Phillips, P. C. B., and Magdalinos, T 2009 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
30 Kostakis, A., Magdalinos, T., and Stamatogiannis, ... 2015 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
31 Breitung, J., and Demetrescu, M 2015 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
32 Phillips, P. C. B 2023 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
33 Bai, J., and Ng, S 2002 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
34 Gon�alves, S., McCracken, M. W., and Perron, B 2017 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
35 Ciccarelli, M., and Mojon, B 2010 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
36 Forbes, K 2019 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
37 Mumtaz, H., and Surico, P 2012 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
38 Auer, R. A., Levchenko, A. A., and Saur\'e, P 2019 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
39 Ha, J.M., Kose, A., and Ohnsorge, F 2021 1 1 2.0 0.020 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.