Citation Analysis

The 2010 U.S. Census Confidentiality Protections Failed; Here's How and Why
John M. Abowd, Tamara Adams, Robert Ashmead, David Darais, Sourya Dey, Simson L. Garfinkel, Nathan Goldschlag, Michael B. Hawes, Daniel Kifer, Philip Leclerc, Ethan Lew, Scott Moore, Rolando A. Rodríguez, Ramy N. Tadros, Lars Vilhuber
https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11283
67
Citation mentions
43
Cited references
6
Sections
15,617
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 U.S. Census Bureau 2012 3 3 5.0 0.045 0.843 100%
2 Rocher, Hendrickx, Montjoye 2019 3 3 6.0 0.045 0.843 100%
3 Dick, Dwork, Kearnsc, Liu, Roth, Vietrie, Wu 2023 3 3 6.0 0.045 0.843 100%
4 Ruggles, Van\bibnamedelima Riper 2022 3 3 6.0 0.045 0.843 100%
5 Kenny, Kuriwaki, McCartan, Rosenman, Simko, Imai 2021 3 3 6.0 0.045 0.843 100%
6 Jarmin, Abowd, Ashmead, Cumings-Menon, Goldschlag,... (self) 2023 3 3 6.0 0.045 0.843 100%
7 McKenna 2018 3 2 6.0 0.045 0.737 100%
8 McKenna 2019 3 2 6.0 0.045 0.737 100%
9 Francis 2022 2 2 4.0 0.030 0.644 100%
10 Hawes (self) 2022 2 2 4.0 0.030 0.644 100%
11 Abowd, Hawes (self) 2023 2 2 4.0 0.030 0.644 100%
12 Abowd, Ashmead, Cumings-Menon, Garfinkel, Heineck,... (self) 2022 3 1 6.0 0.045 0.585 100%
13 Cumings-Menon, Ashmead, Kifer, Leclerc, Spence, Zh... (self) 2025 3 1 6.0 0.045 0.585 100%
14 Rastogi, O'Hara 2012 2 1 4.0 0.030 0.511 100%
15 13 U.S. Code 1954 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
16 44 U.S. Code 2018 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
17 Office of Management and Budget 2024 1 1 1.0 0.015 0.406 100%
18 Abowd, Hawes (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
19 U.S. Census Bureau 2015 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
20 Harris-Kojetin, Alvey, Carlson, Cohen, Cohen, Cox,... 2005 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
21 McKenna 2019 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
22 Garfinkel, Near, Dajani, Singer, Guttman (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
23 Dinur, Nissim 2003 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
24 Muralidhar 2022 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
25 Muralidhar, Domingo-Ferrer 2023 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
26 Ruggles 2024 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
27 Garfinkel (self) 2023 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
28 Hotz, Bollinger, Komarova, Manski, Moffitt, Nekipe... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
29 Willenborg, Waal 2000 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
30 Hundepool, Domingo-Ferrer, Franconi, Giessing, Nor... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
31 Elliot, Domingo-Ferrer 2018 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
32 Duncan, Elliot, Salazar-González 2011 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
33 Garfinkel, Abowd, Martindale (self) 2018 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
34 Brown, Cohen, Denoeux, Dorinski, Heggeness, Lieber... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
35 Dwork, Naor 2010 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
36 Fiscella, Fremont 2006 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
37 Abowd (self) 2019 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
38 Abowd (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
39 Christ, Radway, Bellovin 2022 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
40 Wright, Irimata 2021 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
41 52 U.S. Code Subtitle I 1965 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
42 U.S. Census Bureau 2023 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
43 Cox 1995 1 1 2.0 0.015 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.