← Back to paper list
Citation Analysis
References by Citation Intensity
Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.
| # |
Reference |
Year |
Mentions |
Breadth |
Sec. Wtd |
Share |
Composite |
Main % |
| 1 |
Hausman |
1978 |
2 |
2 |
3.0 |
0.286 |
0.644 |
100% |
| 2 |
Wooldridge |
2010 |
2 |
2 |
4.0 |
0.286 |
0.644 |
100% |
| 3 |
Davidson and MacKinnon |
1993 |
2 |
2 |
4.0 |
0.286 |
0.644 |
100% |
| 4 |
Baum, Schaffer, and Stillman |
2003 |
1 |
1 |
2.0 |
0.143 |
0.406 |
100% |
Measures:
Mentions = total in-text citations;
Breadth = distinct sections;
Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5);
Share = mentions / total citations in paper;
Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio;
Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix).
(self) = self-citation.
