← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\bf The Dynamic Triple Gamma as a Shrinkage Process for Time-Varying Parameter Models
Peter Knaus, Sylvia Frühwirth-Schnatter
https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10487
61
Citation mentions
32
Cited references
14
Sections
3,838
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Kowal, D. R., D. S. Matteson, and D. Ruppert 2019 9 5 17.0 0.148 1.000 100%
2 Cadonna, A., S. Fruhwirth-Schnatter, and P. Knaus (self) 2020 11 9 21.0 0.180 1.000 100%
3 Bitto, A. and S. Fr\"uhwirth-Schnatter 2019 4 4 8.0 0.066 0.928 100%
4 Kalli, M. and J. E. Griffin 2014 3 3 5.0 0.049 0.843 100%
5 Gourieroux, C. and J. Jasiak 2006 3 3 6.0 0.049 0.843 100%
6 Kastner, G. and S. Fr\"uhwirth-Schnatter 2014 3 3 6.0 0.049 0.843 100%
7 Fruhwirth-Schnatter, S. and H. Wagner 2010 2 2 3.0 0.033 0.644 100%
8 Carvalho, C. M., N. G. Polson, and J. G. Scott 2010 2 2 3.0 0.033 0.644 100%
9 Kraus, E 1956 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
10 Petris, G., S. Petrone, and P. Campagnoli 2009 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
11 Koop, G. and D. Korobilis 2012 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
12 Nakajima, J. and M. West 2013 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
13 George, E. I. and R. McCulloch 1993 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
14 Huber, F., G. Kastner, and M. Feldkircher 2019 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
15 Uribe, P. W. and H. F. Lopes 2020 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
16 Ro\vckov\'a, V. and K. McAlinn 2021 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
17 Irie, K 2019 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
18 Huber, F. and M. Pfarrhofer 2021 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
19 Hauzenberger, N., F. Huber, G. Koop, and L. Onoran... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
20 Hauzenberger, N., F. Huber, G. Koop, and J. Mitche... 2022 1 1 1.0 0.016 0.406 100%
21 Jacquier, E., N. G. Polson, and P. E. Rossi 1994 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
22 Griffin, J. E. and P. J. Brown 2017 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
23 Huber, F., G. Koop, and L. Onorante 2021 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
24 Griffin, J. E. and P. J. Brown 2010 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
25 McCausland, W. J., S. Miller, and D. Pelletier 2011 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
26 Makalic, E. and D. F. Schmidt 2016 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
27 van Dyk, D. A. and T. Park 2008 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
28 Fruhwirth-Schnatter, S 2006 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
29 Lopes, H. F., R. E. McCulloch, and R. S. Tsay 2022 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
30 Knaus, P., A. Bitto-Nemling, A. Cadonna, and S. Fr... (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
31 Knaus, P., A. Bitto-Nemling, A. Cadonna, and S. Fr... (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
32 Hosszejni, D. and G. Kastner 2021 1 1 2.0 0.016 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.