Citation Analysis

2312.10333
Denis Chetverikov, Jinyong Hahn, Zhipeng Liao, Shuyang Sheng
https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.10333

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

10,678

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Blandhol, Bonney, Mogstad and Torgovitsky	2022	7	4	12.0	0.106	1.000	100%
2	Angrist and Evans	1998	8	2	14.0	0.121	0.874	100%
3	Angrist, Bettinger, Bloom, King and Kremer	2002	8	2	14.0	0.121	0.874	100%
4	Dube and Harish	2020	11	2	19.0	0.167	0.874	100%
5	Imbens and Angrist	1994	3	2	5.0	0.045	0.737	100%
6	Abadie	2003	2	2	3.0	0.030	0.644	100%
7	Kolesar	2013	2	2	3.0	0.030	0.644	100%
8	Sloczynski	2020	2	2	3.0	0.030	0.644	100%
9	Belloni, Chernozhukov, Fernandez-Val and Hansen	2017	2	2	4.0	0.030	0.644	100%
10	Angrist and Pischke	2009	2	1	4.0	0.030	0.511	100%
11	Frolich	2007	2	1	4.0	0.030	0.511	100%
12	Ramsey	1969	2	1	4.0	0.030	0.511	100%
13	Pregibon	1980	2	1	4.0	0.030	0.511	100%
14	Angrist and Imbens	1995	1	1	1.0	0.015	0.406	100%
15	Horowitz	2009	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
16	Hausman	1978	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
17	Bierens	1982	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
18	Hardle and Mammen	1993	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
19	Horowitz and Spokoiny	2001	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
20	Sorensen	2022	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
21	Chernozhukov, Chetverikov, Demirer, Duflo, Hansen,... (self)	2018	1	1	2.0	0.015	0.406	100%
22	Newey and McFadden	1994	5	3	2.5	0.076	0.215	0%

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.