Citation Analysis

Dynamic Spatiotemporal ARCH Models: Small and Large Sample Results
Philipp Otto, Osman Doğan, Süleyman Taşpınar
https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.05898
28
Citation mentions
8
Cited references
6
Sections
4,014
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Otto, P., Do\u gan, O., and Ta\c sp\inar, S (self) 2023 8 3 14.0 0.286 1.000 100%
2 Lee, L.-F. and Yu, J 2010 9 3 16.0 0.321 1.000 100%
3 Yu, J., de Jong, R., and Lee, L.-F 2008 3 2 4.0 0.107 0.737 100%
4 Lee, L.-F. L. and Yu, J 2014 3 2 5.0 0.107 0.737 100%
5 Lee, L.-F 2007 2 2 3.0 0.071 0.644 100%
6 Robinson, P. M 2009 1 1 1.0 0.036 0.406 100%
7 Ta\c sp\inar, S., Do\u gan, O., Chae, J., and Bera... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.036 0.406 100%
8 Lee, P. M 2012 1 1 2.0 0.036 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.