← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Causal inference and policy evaluation \\ without a control group$^*
Augusto Cerqua, Marco Letta, Fiammetta Menchetti
https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.05858
131
Citation mentions
74
Cited references
11
Sections
6,682
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Callaway, B. and P. H. Sant’Anna 2021 19 4 36.0 0.145 1.000 100%
2 Imbens, G. W. and D. B. Rubin 2015 4 3 7.0 0.031 0.928 100%
3 Arkhangelsky, D. and G. Imbens 2024 4 3 6.0 0.031 0.928 100%
4 Carlana, M., E. La Ferrara, and C. Lopez 2023 4 4 8.0 0.031 0.928 100%
5 Viviano, D. and J. Bradic 2023 3 3 5.0 0.023 0.843 100%
6 Baltagi, B. H 2008 3 2 5.0 0.023 0.737 100%
7 Carvalho, C., R. Masini, and M. C. Medeiros 2018 3 2 5.0 0.023 0.737 100%
8 Masini, R. and M. C. Medeiros 2021 3 2 5.0 0.023 0.737 100%
9 Wager, S. and S. Athey 2018 3 2 6.0 0.023 0.737 100%
10 Abadie, A., A. Diamond, and J. Hainmueller 2010 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
11 Cox, D. R 1958 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
12 Sobel, M. E 2006 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
13 Rubin, D. B 1974 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
14 Liu, L., H. R. Moon, and F. Schorfheide 2020 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
15 Hyndman, R. J. and G. Athanasopoulos 2021 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
16 Brodersen, K. H., F. Gallusser, J. Koehler, N. Rem... 2015 2 2 3.0 0.015 0.644 100%
17 Chernozhukov, V., D. Chetverikov, M. Demirer, E. D... 2018 2 2 4.0 0.015 0.644 100%
18 Johannemann, J., V. Hadad, S. Athey, and S. Wager 2019 2 2 4.0 0.015 0.644 100%
19 Abadie, A 2021 2 2 4.0 0.015 0.644 100%
20 Liu, L., Y. Wang, and Y. Xu 2022 2 2 4.0 0.015 0.644 100%
21 Stantcheva, S 2022 2 2 4.0 0.015 0.644 100%
22 Battisti, M. and G. Maggio 2023 2 2 4.0 0.015 0.644 100%
23 Cerqua, A., R. Di Stefano, M. Letta, and S. Miccol... (self) 2021 2 2 4.0 0.015 0.644 100%
24 Kuhn, M. and K. Johnson 2013 3 1 6.0 0.023 0.585 100%
25 Athey, S., M. Bayati, N. Doudchenko, G. Imbens, an... 2021 2 1 2.0 0.015 0.511 100%
26 Botosaru, I., R. Giacomini, and M. Weidner 2023 2 1 2.0 0.015 0.511 100%
27 Petropoulos, F., D. Apiletti, V. Assimakopoulos, M... 2022 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
28 Athey, S. and S. Wager 2019 2 1 4.0 0.015 0.511 100%
29 Card, D. and A. B. Krueger 1994 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
30 Angrist, J. D. and J.-S. Pischke 2009 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
31 Bai, J 2009 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
32 Duflo, E 2017 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
33 Ashenfelter, O. and D. Card 1985 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
34 Card, D 1990 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
35 Arkhangelsky, D., S. Athey, D. A. Hirshberg, G. W.... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
36 Roth, J., P. H. Sant’Anna, A. Bilinski, and J. Poe 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
37 Holland, P. W 1986 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
38 Arellano, M. and S. Bonhomme 2011 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
39 Box, G. E. and G. C. Tiao 1975 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
40 Chernozhukov, V., K. Wuthrich, and Y. Zhu 2021 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
41 Menchetti, F., F. Cipollini, and F. Mealli (self) 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
42 Rambachan, A. and N. Shephard 2021 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
43 Semenova, V., M. Goldman, V. Chernozhukov, and M. ... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
44 Varian, H. R 2016 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
45 Abrell, J., M. Kosch, and S. Rausch 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
46 Jarvis, S., O. Deschenes, and A. Jha 2022 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
47 Prest, B. C., C. J. Wichman, and K. Palmer 2023 1 1 1.0 0.008 0.406 100%
48 Chiu, A., X. Lan, Z. Liu, and Y. Xu 2023 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
49 Ogburn, E. L. and T. J. VanderWeele 2014 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
50 Xu, Y 2023 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
51 Chernozhukov, V., C. Hansen, N. Kallus, M. Spindle... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
52 Borusyak, K., X. Jaravel, and J. Spiess 2023 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
53 Chen, R., L. Yang, and C. Hafner 2004 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
54 D’Haultfoeuille, X., S. Hoderlein, and Y. Sasaki 2023 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
55 Hoderlein, S. and H. White 2012 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
56 Rambachan, A. and J. Roth 2023 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
57 Fan, Q., Y.-C. Hsu, R. P. Lieli, and Y. Zhang 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
58 Knaus, M. C., M. Lechner, and A. Strittmatter 2021 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
59 Chernozhukov, V., M. Demirer, E. Duflo, and I. Fer... 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
60 Chevillon, G 2007 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
61 Pesaran, M. H., A. Pick, and A. Timmermann 2011 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
62 Bontempi, G. and S. B. Taieb 2011 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
63 Breiman, L 2001 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
64 Mullainathan, S. and J. Spiess 2017 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
65 Eggers, A. C., G. Tunon, and A. Dafoe 2024 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
66 Molnar, C 2020 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
67 Lundberg, S. M. and S.-I. Lee 2017 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
68 Athey, S. and G. Imbens 2016 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
69 Agostinelli, F., M. Doepke, G. Sorrenti, and F. Zi... 2022 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
70 Werner, K. and L. Woessmann 2023 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
71 Basu, S., K. Kumbier, J. B. Brown, and B. Yu 2018 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
72 Bertrand, M., E. Duflo, and S. Mullainathan 2004 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
73 Carlstein, E 1986 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
74 Kunsch, H. R 1989 1 1 2.0 0.008 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.