← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

GMM-lev estimation and individual heterogeneity: Monte Carlo evidence and empirical applications
Maria Elena Bontempi, Jan Ditzen
https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.00399
176
Citation mentions
100
Cited references
8
Sections
12,082
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Arellano, M. and Bover, O. 1995 5 3 8.0 0.028 1.000 100%
2 Mundlak, Y. 1978 13 3 19.0 0.074 1.000 100%
3 Bun, M. J. G. and Kiviet, J. F. 2006 4 3 6.0 0.023 0.928 100%
4 Hsiao, C. and Zhou, Q. 2018 4 3 6.0 0.023 0.928 100%
5 Alvarez, J. and Arellano, M. 2022 4 3 6.0 0.023 0.928 100%
6 Arellano, M. and Bond, S. R. 1991 3 3 5.0 0.017 0.843 100%
7 Blundell, R. W. and Bond, S. R. 1998 3 3 5.0 0.017 0.843 100%
8 Alvarez, J. and Arellano, M. 2003 3 3 5.0 0.017 0.843 100%
9 Chamberlain, G. 1980 4 2 6.0 0.023 0.811 100%
10 Kripfganz, S. 2019 18 6 22.5 0.102 0.794 50%
11 Kiviet, J. F. 2007 3 2 4.0 0.017 0.737 100%
12 Nerlove, M. and Sevestre, P. and Balestra, P. 2008 3 2 5.0 0.017 0.737 100%
13 Hausman, J. A. and Taylor, W. E. 1981 3 2 4.0 0.017 0.737 100%
14 Hsiao, C. 2020 3 2 4.0 0.017 0.737 100%
15 Bontempi, M. E. and Lambertini, L. and Parigi, G. (self) 2023 3 2 6.0 0.017 0.737 100%
16 Acemoğlu, D. and Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. A. a... 2008 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
17 Peters, B. 2009 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
18 Moral-Benito 2013 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
19 Bai, J. and Kao, C. and Ng, S. 2009 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
20 Jin, F. and Lee, L.-F. and Yu J. 2021 2 2 3.0 0.011 0.644 100%
21 Blundell, R. W. and Bond, S. R. 2000 4 1 8.0 0.023 0.644 100%
22 Phillips, R. F. 2010 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
23 Phillips, R. F. 2015 2 1 2.0 0.011 0.511 100%
24 Anderson, T. W. and Hsiao, C. 1981 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
25 Bhargava, A. and Sargan, J. D. 1983 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
26 Hausman, J. A. 1978 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
27 Schumpeter, J. A 1943 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
28 Arrow, K. J. 1962 2 1 4.0 0.011 0.511 100%
29 Haber, S. and Menaldo, V. 2011 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
30 Kropko, J. and Kubinec, R. 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
31 Acemoğlu, D. and Naidu, S. and Restrepo, P. and Ro... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
32 Gormley, T. A. and Matsa, D. A. 2014 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
33 Gelman, A. 2006 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
34 Collischon, M. and Eberl, A. 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
35 Hill, T. D. and In Song 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
36 Imai, K. and Davis, A. P. and Roos, J. M. and Fren... 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
37 Mátyás, L. 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
38 Yang, Y. and Schmidt, P. 2021 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
39 Heckman, J. J. 1991 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
40 Page, S. E. 2006 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
41 Bednar, J. and Page, S. E. and Toole, J. L. 2012 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
42 Atkinson, A. B. and Stiglitz, J. E. 1969 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
43 Haavelmo, T. 1944 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
44 Kripfganz, S. and Schwarz, C. 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
45 Riju, J. and Wooldridge, J. M. 2019 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
46 Allison, P. D. and Williams, R. and Moral-Benito 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
47 Moral-Benito 2013 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
48 Wooldridge, J. M. 2000 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
49 Wooldridge, J. M. 2005 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
50 Rabe-Hesketh, S. and Skrondal, A. 2013 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
51 Bai, J. 2013 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
52 Hayakawa, K. 2007 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
53 Hayakawa, K. 2009 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
54 Hayakawa, K. 2015 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
55 Hayakawa, K. and Nagata, S. 2016 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
56 Bun, M. J. G. and Windmeijer, F. 2010 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
57 Kiviet, J. F. and Pleus, M. and Poldermans, R. W. 2017 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
58 Kiviet, J. F. 2020 1 1 1.0 0.006 0.406 100%
59 Crowder, M. J. and Hand, D.J. 1990 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
60 Chudik, Alexander and Pesaran, M. Hashem and Toset... 2011 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
61 Pesaran, M. H. 2006 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
62 Anderson, T. W. and Hsiao, C. 1982 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
63 Binder, M. and Hsiao, C. and Pesaran, M. H. 2005 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
64 Bewley, R. A. 1979 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
65 Hahn, J. 1999 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
66 Bhargava, A. 1987 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
67 Neyman, J. and Scott, E. L. 1948 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
68 Lancaster, T. 2000 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
69 Moon, H. R. and Perron, B. and Phillips, P. C. B. 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
70 Nerlove, M. and Balestra, P. 1992 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
71 Bai, J. 2009 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
72 Bell, A. J. D. and Jones, K. 2015 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
73 Abrevaya, J. 2006 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
74 Robinson, W. S. 1950 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
75 Lee, L.-F. and Yu J. 2020 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
76 Wooldridge, J. M. 2019 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
77 Wooldridge, J. M. 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
78 Schunck, R. 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
79 Schunck, R. and Perales, F. 2017 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
80 Wooldridge, J. M. 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
81 Arellano, M. 1993 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
82 Guggenberger, P. 2010 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
83 Vella, F. and Verbeek, M. J. C. 1998 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
84 Ziliak, J. P. 1997 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
85 Macher, J. T. and Miller, N. H. and Osborne, M. 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
86 DiTraglia, F. J. 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
87 Chamberlain, G. 1982 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
88 Roodman, D. 2009 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
89 Hause, J. C. 1980 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
90 Bond, S. R. and Hoeffler, A. and Temple, J. 2001 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
91 Nickell, S. J. 1981 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
92 R\"u 2014 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
93 Marley-Zagar, E. and White, I. and Morris, T. 2022 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
94 Williams, R. and Allison, P. D. and Moral-Benito 2018 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
95 Kripfganz, S. 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
96 Baker, S. R. and Bloom, N. and Davis, S. J. 2016 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
97 Bontempi, M. E. and Golinelli, R. and Frigeri, M. ... (self) 2021 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
98 Antonelli, C. and Crespi, F. and Scellato, G. 2012 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
99 Le Bas 2014 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
100 Antonelli, C. and Crespi, F. and Scellato, G. 2013 1 1 2.0 0.006 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.