Citation Analysis – Extrapolating Away from the Cutoff in \\ Regression Discontinuity Designs

Extrapolating Away from the Cutoff in \\ Regression Discontinuity Designs
Yiwei Sun
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.18136

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

6,708

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Angrist, J. D. and Rokkanen, M	2015	7	4	7.0	0.075	1.000	100%
2	Cattaneo, M. D., Keele, L., Titiunik, R., and Vazq...	2021	16	7	26.5	0.172	1.000	100%
3	Battistin, E. and Rettore, E	2008	4	3	4.0	0.043	0.928	100%
4	Yata, K	2021	3	3	3.5	0.032	0.843	100%
5	Manski, C. F. and Pepper, J. V	2018	3	2	4.5	0.032	0.737	100%
6	Rambachan, A. and Roth, J	2023	3	2	4.5	0.032	0.737	100%
7	Kline, P. and Santos, A	2013	3	2	4.5	0.032	0.737	100%
8	Cattaneo, M. D., Keele, L., and Titiunik, R	2023b	3	2	4.5	0.032	0.737	100%
9	Hahn, J., Todd, P., and Van der Klaauw, W	2001	2	2	3.0	0.022	0.644	100%
10	Manski, C. F	1989	2	2	1.5	0.022	0.644	100%
11	Cattaneo, M. D. and Titiunik, R	2022	2	2	2.5	0.022	0.644	100%
12	Imbens, G. W. and Lemieux, T	2008	2	2	2.5	0.022	0.644	100%
13	Van der Klaauw, W	2008	2	2	2.5	0.022	0.644	100%
14	Imbens, G. W. and Rubin, D. B	2015	2	2	2.5	0.022	0.644	100%
15	Mealli, F. and Rampichini, C	2012	2	2	2.5	0.022	0.644	100%
16	Kolesar, M. and Rothe, C	2018	2	2	2.5	0.022	0.644	100%
17	Masten, M. A. and Poirier, A	2018	2	2	2.5	0.022	0.644	100%
18	Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., Farrell, M. H., and...	2019	2	2	2.5	0.022	0.644	100%
19	Tamer, E	2010	3	1	1.5	0.032	0.585	100%
20	Cattaneo, M. D., Idrobo, N., and Titiunik, R	2023a	3	1	6.0	0.032	0.585	100%
21	Molinari, F	2020	2	1	1.0	0.022	0.511	100%
22	Cattaneo, M. D., Titiunik, R., Vazquez-Bare, G., a...	2016	2	1	4.0	0.022	0.511	100%
23	Thistlethwaite, D. L. and Campbell, D. T	1960	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
24	Lee, D. S	2008	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
25	Zhang, Y., Ben-Michael, E., and Imai, K	2022	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
26	Choi, J. Y. and Lee, M. J	2021	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.406	100%
27	Choi, J. Y. and Lee, M. J	2017	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.406	100%
28	Palomba, F	2023	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.406	100%
29	Rokkanen, M. A	2015	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.406	100%
30	Bennett, M	2020	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.406	100%
31	Bertanha, M. and Imbens, G. W	2020	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.406	100%
32	Dong, Y. and Lewbel, A	2015	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.406	100%
33	Manski, C. F	1990	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.406	100%
34	Manski, C. F	1997	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.406	100%
35	Kim, W., Kwon, K., Kwon, S., and Lee, S	2018	1	1	0.5	0.011	0.406	100%
36	Lee, D. S. and Lemieux, T	2010	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
37	Manski, C. F	2003	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
38	Roth, J	2022	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
39	Hansen, B. E	2014	1	1	2.0	0.011	0.406	100%
40	Imbens, G. W. and Manski, C. F	2004	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
41	Stoye, J	2009	1	1	1.0	0.011	0.406	100%
42			2	1	2.0	0.022	0.110	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Angrist, J. D. and Rokkanen, M

2015

7.0

0.075

1.000

100%

Cattaneo, M. D., Keele, L., Titiunik, R., and Vazq...

2021

26.5

0.172

1.000

100%

Battistin, E. and Rettore, E

2008

4.0

0.043

0.928

100%

Yata, K

2021

3.5

0.032

0.843

100%

Manski, C. F. and Pepper, J. V

2018

4.5

0.032

0.737

100%

Rambachan, A. and Roth, J

2023

4.5

0.032

0.737

100%

Kline, P. and Santos, A

2013

4.5

0.032

0.737

100%

Cattaneo, M. D., Keele, L., and Titiunik, R

2023b

4.5

0.032

0.737

100%

Hahn, J., Todd, P., and Van der Klaauw, W

2001

3.0

0.022

0.644

100%

Manski, C. F

1989

1.5

0.022

0.644

100%

Cattaneo, M. D. and Titiunik, R

2022

2.5

0.022

0.644

100%

Imbens, G. W. and Lemieux, T

2008

2.5

0.022

0.644

100%

Van der Klaauw, W

2008

2.5

0.022

0.644

100%

Imbens, G. W. and Rubin, D. B

2015

2.5

0.022

0.644

100%

Mealli, F. and Rampichini, C

2012

2.5

0.022

0.644

100%

Kolesar, M. and Rothe, C

2018

2.5

0.022

0.644

100%

Masten, M. A. and Poirier, A

2018

2.5

0.022

0.644

100%

Calonico, S., Cattaneo, M. D., Farrell, M. H., and...

2019

2.5

0.022

0.644

100%

Tamer, E

2010

1.5

0.032

0.585

100%

Cattaneo, M. D., Idrobo, N., and Titiunik, R

2023a

6.0

0.032

0.585

100%

Molinari, F

2020

1.0

0.022

0.511

100%

Cattaneo, M. D., Titiunik, R., Vazquez-Bare, G., a...

2016

4.0

0.022

0.511

100%

Thistlethwaite, D. L. and Campbell, D. T

1960

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Lee, D. S

2008

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Zhang, Y., Ben-Michael, E., and Imai, K

2022

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Choi, J. Y. and Lee, M. J

2021

0.5

0.011

0.406

100%

Choi, J. Y. and Lee, M. J

2017

0.5

0.011

0.406

100%

Palomba, F

2023

0.5

0.011

0.406

100%

Rokkanen, M. A

2015

0.5

0.011

0.406

100%

Bennett, M

2020

0.5

0.011

0.406

100%

Bertanha, M. and Imbens, G. W

2020

0.5

0.011

0.406

100%

Dong, Y. and Lewbel, A

2015

0.5

0.011

0.406

100%

Manski, C. F

1990

0.5

0.011

0.406

100%

Manski, C. F

1997

0.5

0.011

0.406

100%

Kim, W., Kwon, K., Kwon, S., and Lee, S

2018

0.5

0.011

0.406

100%

Lee, D. S. and Lemieux, T

2010

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Manski, C. F

2003

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Roth, J

2022

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Hansen, B. E

2014

2.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Imbens, G. W. and Manski, C. F

2004

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

Stoye, J

2009

1.0

0.011

0.406

100%

2.0

0.022

0.110

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.