Citation Analysis

On the Limits of Regression Adjustment
Daniel Ting, Kenneth Hung
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17858
12
Citation mentions
7
Cited references
4
Sections
1,315
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Guo, Yongyi and Coey, Dominic and Konutgan, Mikael... 2021 3 3 5.0 0.250 0.843 100%
2 Kevin Guo and Guillaume Basse 2023 3 3 5.0 0.250 0.843 100%
3 Deng, Alex and Xu, Ya and Kohavi, Ron and Walker, ... 2013 2 2 3.0 0.167 0.644 100%
4 Winston Lin 2013 1 1 1.0 0.083 0.406 100%
5 Congshan Zhang and Dominic Coey and Matt Goldman a... 2021 1 1 1.0 0.083 0.406 100%
6 Deng, Alex and Du, Michelle and Matlin, Anna and Z... 2023 1 1 1.0 0.083 0.406 100%
7 Xie, Huizhi and Aurisset, Juliette 2016 1 1 2.0 0.083 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.