Citation Analysis – Optimal Categorical Instrumental Variables\inPublicVersion

Optimal Categorical Instrumental Variables\inPublicVersion
Thomas Wiemann
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17021

153

Citation mentions

Cited references

Sections

8,264

Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

#	Reference	Year	Mentions	Breadth	Sec. Wtd	Share	Composite	Main %
1	Dobbie, W., Goldin, J., and Yang, C. S	2018	7	3	9.0	0.046	1.000	100%
2	Chyn, E., Frandsen, B., and Leslie, E. C	2024	12	4	20.0	0.078	1.000	100%
3	Kolesar, M	2013	11	6	15.0	0.072	0.935	82%
4	Belloni, A., Chen, D., Chernozhukov, V., and Hanse...	2012	13	6	17.5	0.085	0.916	77%
5	Angrist, J. D. and Frandsen, B	2022	7	5	8.0	0.046	0.894	71%
6	Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., and Krueger, A. B	1999	7	4	9.0	0.046	0.894	71%
7	Donald, S. G. and Newey, W. K	2001	6	3	6.0	0.039	0.874	67%
8	Blandhol, C., Bonney, J., Mogstad, M., and Torgovi...	2022	4	4	5.5	0.026	0.843	75%
9	Bonhomme, S. and Manresa, E	2015	11	5	11.5	0.072	0.817	55%
10	Chao, J. C., Swanson, N. R., Hausman, J. A., Newey...	2012	4	2	5.0	0.026	0.811	100%
11	Angrist, J. D. and Krueger, A. B	1991	5	3	4.5	0.033	0.737	40%
12	Ackerberg, D. A. and Devereux, P. J	2009	4	4	4.0	0.026	0.737	50%
13	Chamberlain, G	1987	3	3	3.5	0.020	0.737	67%
14	Newey, W. K	1990	3	2	4.0	0.020	0.737	100%
15	Wang, H. and Song, M	2011	4	4	4.0	0.026	0.737	50%
16	Ackerberg, D. A. and Devereux, P. J	2006	2	2	3.0	0.013	0.644	100%
17	Bekker, P. A. and Van der Ploeg, J	2005	2	2	3.0	0.013	0.644	100%
18	Imbens, G. and Angrist, J. D	1994	2	2	3.0	0.013	0.644	100%
19	Carrasco, M	2012	2	2	3.0	0.013	0.644	100%
20	Fisher, W. D	1958	2	2	3.0	0.013	0.644	100%
21	Mikusheva, A. and Sun, L	2022	3	2	2.0	0.020	0.511	33%
22	Agan, A., Doleac, J. L., and Harvey, A	2023	2	1	2.0	0.013	0.511	100%
23	Bekker, P. A	1994	2	1	2.0	0.013	0.511	100%
24	Phillips, G. D. A. and Hale, C	1977	2	1	2.0	0.013	0.511	100%
25	Frandsen, B., Leslie, E., and McIntyre, S	2023b	2	1	2.0	0.013	0.511	100%
26	Angrist, J. D. and Krueger, A. B	1995	2	2	1.5	0.013	0.511	50%
27	Hansen, C., Hausman, J., and Newey, W	2008	2	2	1.5	0.013	0.511	50%
28	Hahn, J. and Moon, H. R	2010	2	1	2.0	0.013	0.511	100%
29	Bester, C. A. and Hansen, C. B	2016	2	1	2.0	0.013	0.511	100%
30	Su, L., Shi, Z., and Phillips, P. C	2016	2	1	2.0	0.013	0.511	100%
31	Gilchrist, D. S. and Sands, E. G	2016	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
32	Dhar, D., Jain, T., and Jayachandran, S	2022	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
33	Kolesar, M., Muller, U. K., and Roelsgaard, S. T	2023	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
34	Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Du...	2018	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
35	Kling, J. R	2006	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
36	Maestas, N., Mullen, K. J., and Strand, A	2013	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
37	Aizer, A. and Doyle Jr, J. J	2015	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
38	Bhuller, M., Dahl, G. B., L\oken, K. V., and Mogst...	2020	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
39	Davidson, R. and MacKinnon, J. G	2006	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
40	Hansen, C. and Kozbur, D	2014	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
41	Chao, J. C. and Swanson, N. R	2005	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
42	Hausman, J. A., Newey, W. K., Woutersen, T., Chao,...	2012	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
43	Amemiya, T	1974	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
44	Chamberlain, G. and Imbens, G	2004	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
45	Okui, R	2011	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
46	Chetverikov, D. and Manresa, E	2022	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
47	Mugnier, M	2022	1	1	1.0	0.007	0.406	100%
48	Angrist, J. D. and Imbens, G. W	1995	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
49	Frandsen, B., Lefgren, L., and Leslie, E	2023a	1	1	2.0	0.007	0.406	100%
50	Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A., and Baker, R. M	1995	1	1	0.5	0.007	0.087	0%
51	Wuthrich, K. and Zhu, Y	2023	1	1	0.5	0.007	0.087	0%

Reference

Year

Mentions

Breadth

Sec. Wtd

Composite

Main %

Dobbie, W., Goldin, J., and Yang, C. S

2018

9.0

0.046

1.000

100%

Chyn, E., Frandsen, B., and Leslie, E. C

2024

20.0

0.078

1.000

100%

Kolesar, M

2013

15.0

0.072

0.935

82%

Belloni, A., Chen, D., Chernozhukov, V., and Hanse...

2012

17.5

0.085

0.916

77%

Angrist, J. D. and Frandsen, B

2022

8.0

0.046

0.894

71%

Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., and Krueger, A. B

1999

9.0

0.046

0.894

71%

Donald, S. G. and Newey, W. K

2001

6.0

0.039

0.874

67%

Blandhol, C., Bonney, J., Mogstad, M., and Torgovi...

2022

5.5

0.026

0.843

75%

Bonhomme, S. and Manresa, E

2015

11.5

0.072

0.817

55%

Chao, J. C., Swanson, N. R., Hausman, J. A., Newey...

2012

5.0

0.026

0.811

100%

Angrist, J. D. and Krueger, A. B

1991

4.5

0.033

0.737

40%

Ackerberg, D. A. and Devereux, P. J

2009

4.0

0.026

0.737

50%

Chamberlain, G

1987

3.5

0.020

0.737

67%

Newey, W. K

1990

4.0

0.020

0.737

100%

Wang, H. and Song, M

2011

4.0

0.026

0.737

50%

Ackerberg, D. A. and Devereux, P. J

2006

3.0

0.013

0.644

100%

Bekker, P. A. and Van der Ploeg, J

2005

3.0

0.013

0.644

100%

Imbens, G. and Angrist, J. D

1994

3.0

0.013

0.644

100%

Carrasco, M

2012

3.0

0.013

0.644

100%

Fisher, W. D

1958

3.0

0.013

0.644

100%

Mikusheva, A. and Sun, L

2022

2.0

0.020

0.511

33%

Agan, A., Doleac, J. L., and Harvey, A

2023

2.0

0.013

0.511

100%

Bekker, P. A

1994

2.0

0.013

0.511

100%

Phillips, G. D. A. and Hale, C

1977

2.0

0.013

0.511

100%

Frandsen, B., Leslie, E., and McIntyre, S

2023b

2.0

0.013

0.511

100%

Angrist, J. D. and Krueger, A. B

1995

1.5

0.013

0.511

50%

Hansen, C., Hausman, J., and Newey, W

2008

1.5

0.013

0.511

50%

Hahn, J. and Moon, H. R

2010

2.0

0.013

0.511

100%

Bester, C. A. and Hansen, C. B

2016

2.0

0.013

0.511

100%

Su, L., Shi, Z., and Phillips, P. C

2016

2.0

0.013

0.511

100%

Gilchrist, D. S. and Sands, E. G

2016

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Dhar, D., Jain, T., and Jayachandran, S

2022

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Kolesar, M., Muller, U. K., and Roelsgaard, S. T

2023

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Du...

2018

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Kling, J. R

2006

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Maestas, N., Mullen, K. J., and Strand, A

2013

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Aizer, A. and Doyle Jr, J. J

2015

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Bhuller, M., Dahl, G. B., L\oken, K. V., and Mogst...

2020

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Davidson, R. and MacKinnon, J. G

2006

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Hansen, C. and Kozbur, D

2014

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Chao, J. C. and Swanson, N. R

2005

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Hausman, J. A., Newey, W. K., Woutersen, T., Chao,...

2012

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Amemiya, T

1974

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Chamberlain, G. and Imbens, G

2004

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Okui, R

2011

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Chetverikov, D. and Manresa, E

2022

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Mugnier, M

2022

1.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Angrist, J. D. and Imbens, G. W

1995

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Frandsen, B., Lefgren, L., and Leslie, E

2023a

2.0

0.007

0.406

100%

Bound, J., Jaeger, D. A., and Baker, R. M

1995

0.5

0.007

0.087

Wuthrich, K. and Zhu, Y

2023

0.5

0.007

0.087

Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.