← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

Policy Learning with Distributional Welfare
Yifan Cui, Sukjin Han
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.15878
116
Citation mentions
83
Cited references
14
Sections
9,474
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Zhao, Y., D. Zeng, A. J. Rush, and M. R. Kosorok 2012 5 5 6.0 0.043 0.928 80%
2 Leqi, L. and E. H. Kennedy 2021 5 2 8.5 0.043 0.874 100%
3 Cui, Y. (self) 2021 3 3 3.5 0.026 0.843 100%
4 Manski, C. F. 2004 3 2 2.5 0.026 0.737 100%
5 Wang, L., Y. Zhou, R. Song, and B. Sherwood 2018 3 2 4.5 0.026 0.737 100%
6 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2007 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
7 Stoye, J. 2007 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
8 Hirano, K. and G. W. Imbens 2001 2 2 3.0 0.017 0.644 100%
9 D'Adamo, R. 2021 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.644 100%
10 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2023 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.644 100%
11 Frandsen, B. R. and L. J. Lefgren 2021 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
12 Blundell, R., A. Gosling, H. Ichimura, and C. Megh... 2007 2 2 4.0 0.017 0.644 100%
13 Bloom, H. S., L. L. Orr, S. H. Bell, G. Cave, F. D... 1997 2 2 1.5 0.017 0.511 50%
14 Kitagawa, T. and A. Tetenov 2018 2 2 1.0 0.017 0.511 50%
15 Murphy, S. A. 2003 2 1 1.0 0.017 0.511 100%
16 Chernozhukov, V., I. Fernandez-Val, S. Han, and K.... (self) 2024 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.511 50%
17 Chernozhukov, V., I. Fernandez-Val, J. Hahn, and W... 2013 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.511 50%
18 Fan, Y. and S. S. Park 2010 3 2 3.0 0.026 0.511 33%
19 Heckman, J. J., J. Smith, and N. Clements 1997 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
20 Abbring, J. H. and J. J. Heckman 2007 2 2 2.5 0.017 0.511 50%
21 Sancetta, A. and S. Satchell 2004 2 1 4.0 0.017 0.511 100%
22 Heckman, J. J. and J. A. Smith 1998 3 2 3.0 0.026 0.511 33%
23 Chen, Q., M. Austern, and V. Syrgkanis 2023 1 1 1.0 0.009 0.406 100%
24 Dud\'\ik, M., J. Langford, and L. Li 2011 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
25 Hirano, K. and J. R. Porter 2009 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
26 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2009 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
27 Athey, S. and S. Wager 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
28 Mbakop, E. and M. Tabord-Meehan 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
29 Ida, T., T. Ishihara, K. Ito, D. Kido, T. Kitagawa... 2022 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
30 Kosorok, M. R. and E. E. Moodie 2015 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
31 Kosorok, M. R. and E. B. Laber 2019 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
32 Tsiatis, A. A., M. Davidian, S. T. Holloway, and E... 2019 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
33 Jiang, B., R. Song, J. Li, and D. Zeng 2019 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
34 Watkins, C. J. and P. Dayan 1992 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
35 Qian, M. and S. A. Murphy 2011 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
36 Robins, J. M. 2004 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
37 Shi, C., A. Fan, R. Song, and W. Lu 2018 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
38 Zhang, B., A. A. Tsiatis, E. B. Laber, and M. Davi... 2012 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
39 Rubin, D. B. and M. J. van der Laan 2012 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
40 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
41 Qiu, H., M. Carone, E. Sadikova, M. Petukhova, R. ... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
42 Han, S. (self) 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
43 Cui, Y. and E. Tchetgen Tchetgen (self) 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
44 Kallus, N., X. Mao, and M. Uehara 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
45 Qi, Z., R. Miao, and X. Zhang 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
46 Shen, T. and Y. Cui (self) 2023 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
47 Kallus, N. and A. Zhou 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
48 Pu, H. and B. Zhang 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
49 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2012 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
50 Yata, K. 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
51 Ben-Michael, E., D. J. Greiner, K. Imai, and Z. Ji... 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
52 Ishihara, T. and T. Kitagawa 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
53 Adjaho, C. and T. Christensen 2022 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
54 Qi, Z., J.-S. Pang, and Y. Liu 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
55 Linn, K. A., E. B. Laber, and L. A. Stefanski 2017 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
56 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2021 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
57 Kock, A. B., D. Preinerstorfer, and B. Veliyev 2022 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
58 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2023 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
59 Kock, A. B. and D. Preinerstorfer 2024 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
60 Manski, C. F. and A. Tetenov 2023 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
61 Kitagawa, T., S. Lee, and C. Qiu 2023 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.406 100%
62 Kallus, N. 2022 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
63 Doksum, K. 1974 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
64 Lehmann, E. L. 1975 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
65 Savage, L. J. 1951 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
66 Kasy, M. 2016 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
67 Kitagawa, T., S. Sakaguchi, and A. Tetenov 2021 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
68 Joe, H. 2014 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
69 Lee, S. 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
70 Chernozhukov, V. and C. Hansen 2005 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
71 Vuong, Q. and H. Xu 2017 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
72 Steinwart, I. and C. Scovel 2007 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
73 Villani, C. 2009 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
74 Han, S. and S. Yang (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
75 Connors, A. F., T. Speroff, N. V. Dawson, C. Thoma... 1996 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
76 Kaji, T. and J. Cao 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
77 ---\hspace-.1pt---\hspace-.1pt--- 2023 1 1 2.0 0.009 0.406 100%
78 Makarov, G. 1982 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
79 Williamson, R. C. and T. Downs 1990 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
80 Firpo, S. and G. Ridder 2019 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
81 Heckman, J. J. and B. E. Honore 1990 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
82 Lee, J. H. and B. G. Park 2023 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
83 Zhao, Y. Q., D. Zeng, E. B. Laber, R. Song, M. Yua... 2015 1 1 0.5 0.009 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.