← Back to paper list

Citation Analysis

\textbf\Large Reproducible Aggregation of Sample-Split Statistics$^*$
David M. Ritzwoller, Joseph P. Romano
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14204
295
Citation mentions
109
Cited references
10
Sections
7,827
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Chernozhukov, V., Chetverikov, D., Demirer, M., Du... 2018 10 7 17.5 0.034 1.000 100%
2 Chatterjee, S 2005 8 6 15.0 0.027 1.000 100%
3 DiCiccio, C. J., DiCiccio, T. J., and Romano, J. P (self) 2020 5 4 8.5 0.017 1.000 100%
4 Wasserman, L., Ramdas, A., and Balakrishnan, S 2020 5 4 8.5 0.017 1.000 100%
5 Chernozhukov, V., Demirer, M., Duflo, E., and Fern... 2023 7 4 12.5 0.024 1.000 100%
6 Casey, K., Kamara, A. B., and Meriggi, N. F 2021 27 8 54.0 0.092 1.000 100%
7 Chakravorty, B., Arulampalam, W., Bhatiya, A. Y., ... 2024 26 7 52.0 0.088 1.000 100%
8 Haushofer, J., Niehaus, P., Paramo, C., Miguel, E.... 2022 24 4 48.0 0.081 1.000 100%
9 Beaman, L., Karlan, D., Thuysbaert, B., and Udry, ... 2023 18 4 36.0 0.061 1.000 100%
10 Chen, Q., Syrgkanis, V., and Austern, M 2022 13 4 26.0 0.044 1.000 100%
11 Chatterjee, S 2007 6 5 12.0 0.020 1.000 100%
12 Zhang, Z.-S 2022 5 3 10.0 0.017 1.000 100%
13 Athey, S., Tibshirani, J., and Wager, S 2019 4 3 8.0 0.014 0.928 100%
14 Steiger, W 1970 4 3 8.0 0.014 0.928 100%
15 Paulin, D., Mackey, L., and Tropp, J. A 2016 4 3 8.0 0.014 0.928 100%
16 Egger, D., Haushofer, J., Miguel, E., Niehaus, P.,... 2022 9 2 18.0 0.031 0.874 100%
17 Stein, C 1986 3 3 5.0 0.010 0.843 100%
18 Kale, S., Kumar, R., and Vassilvitskii, S 2011 3 3 4.5 0.010 0.843 100%
19 Kumar, R., Lokshtanov, D., Vassilvitskii, S., and ... 2013 3 3 4.5 0.010 0.843 100%
20 Austern, M. and Zhou, W 2020 3 2 3.0 0.010 0.737 100%
21 Bach, P., Kurz, M. S., Chernozhukov, V., Spindler,... 2024 3 2 6.0 0.010 0.737 100%
22 Ramdas, A. and Manole, T 2023 3 2 6.0 0.010 0.737 100%
23 Stone, M 1974 2 2 3.0 0.007 0.644 100%
24 Schick, A 1986 2 2 3.0 0.007 0.644 100%
25 Ross, N 2011 2 2 3.0 0.007 0.644 100%
26 Chen, L. H., Goldstein, L., and Shao, Q.-M 2011 2 2 3.0 0.007 0.644 100%
27 Bousquet, O. and Elisseeff, A 2002 2 2 2.5 0.007 0.644 100%
28 Tibshirani, R 1996 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
29 Wright, M. N. and Ziegler, A 2017 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
30 Anscombe, F. J 1952 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
31 Chow, Y. S. and Robbins, H 1965 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
32 Ruger, B 1978 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
33 Meinshausen, N., Meier, L., and Buhlmann, P 2009 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
34 Shevtsova, I 2011 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
35 Shao, Q.-M. and Zhang, Z.-S 2019 2 2 4.0 0.007 0.644 100%
36 Hansen, S., McMahon, M., and Prat, A 2018 2 1 4.0 0.007 0.511 100%
37 Covert, T. R. and Sweeney, R. L 2023 2 1 4.0 0.007 0.511 100%
38 Arlot, S. and Celisse, A 2010 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
39 Bickel, P. J 1982 1 1 1.0 0.003 0.406 100%
40 Guo, W. and Romano, J. P (self) 2017 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
41 Rinaldo, A., Wasserman, L., and G’Sell, M 2019 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
42 Meinshausen, N. and Buhlmann, P 2010 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
43 Lei, J., G’Sell, M., Rinaldo, A., Tibshirani, R. J... 2018 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
44 Barber, R. F. and Candes, E. J 2015 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
45 Dietterich, T. G 1998 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
46 Nadeau, C. and Bengio, Y 1999 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
47 Lei, J 2020 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
48 Bayle, P., Bayle, A., Janson, L., and Mackey, L 2020 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
49 Bates, S., Hastie, T., and Tibshirani, R 2023 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
50 Cornec, M 2010 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
51 Abou-Moustafa, K. and Szepesvari, C 2019 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
52 Motwani, R. and Raghavan, P 1995 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
53 Beran, R. and Millar, P. W 1987 1 1 0.5 0.003 0.406 100%
54 Belloni, A., Chernozhukov, V., and Hansen, C 2014 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
55 Belloni, A., Chen, D., Chernozhukov, V., and Hanse... 2012 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
56 Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., and Wainwright, M 2015 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
57 Mastrobuoni, G 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
58 Arnold, D., Dobbie, W., and Hull, P 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
59 Blattman, C., Duncan, G., Lessing, B., and Tobon, ... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
60 Sadka, J., Seira, E., and Woodruff, C 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
61 Fudenberg, D. and Liang, A 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
62 Ellison, G. and Pathak, P. A 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
63 Deryugina, T., Heutel, G., Miller, N. H., Molitor,... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
64 Cicala, S 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
65 Koijen, R. S., Richmond, R. J., and Yogo, M 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
66 Abaluck, J., Agha, L., Kabrhel, C., Raja, A., and ... 2016 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
67 Cooper, Z., Scott Morton, F., and Shekita, N 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
68 Kelly, M., Mokyr, J., and O Grada, C 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
69 Dube, J.-P. and Misra, S 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
70 Chen, Z., Liu, Z., Suarez Serrato, J. C., and Xu, ... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
71 Myers, K. R. and Lanahan, L 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
72 Muendler, M.-A. and Becker, S. O 2010 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
73 Card, D., DellaVigna, S., Funk, P., and Iriberri, ... 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
74 Adermon, A., Lindahl, M., and Palme, M 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
75 Derenoncourt, E 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
76 Agarwal, N., Ashlagi, I., Azevedo, E., Featherston... 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
77 Gentzkow, M., Shapiro, J. M., and Taddy, M 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
78 Cantoni, E. and Pons, V 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
79 Okunogbe, O. and Pouliquen, V 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
80 Beraja, M., Kao, A., Yang, D. Y., and Yuchtman, N 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
81 Delfino, A 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
82 Farronato, C., Fradkin, A., Larsen, B. J., and Bry... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
83 Ahrens, A., Hansen, C. B., Schaffer, M. E., and Wi... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
84 Athey, S. and Wager, S 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
85 Yadlowsky, S., Fleming, S., Shah, N., Brunskill, E... 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
86 Gut, A 2009 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
87 Renyi, A 1957 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
88 Chetverikov, D., Liao, Z., and Chernozhukov, V 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
89 Vovk, V. and Wang, R 2020 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
90 Friedman, J., Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Narasimh... 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
91 Ritzwoller, D. M. and Syrgkanis, V (self) 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
92 Elisseeff, A., Evgeniou, T., Pontil, M., and Kaelb... 2005 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
93 Hardt, M., Recht, B., and Singer, Y 2016 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
94 Landers, D. and Rogge, L 1976 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
95 Landers, D. and Rogge, L 1988 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
96 Shao, J 1993 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
97 Chetverikov, D 2024 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
98 Ramdas, A., Grunwald, P., Vovk, V., and Shafer, G 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
99 Dunn, R., Ramdas, A., Balakrishnan, S., and Wasser... 2023 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
100 Tse, T. and Davison, A. C 2022 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
101 Knight, K. and Fu, W 2000 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
102 Van Der Vaart, A. W. and Wellner, J. A 1996 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
103 Dembo, A 2021 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
104 Durrett, R 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
105 Burkholder, D. L 1973 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
106 Boucheron, S., Lugosi, G., and Massart, P 2003 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
107 Paulin, D., Mackey, L., and Tropp, J. A 2013 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
108 Wainwright, M. J 2019 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
109 Levin, D. A. and Peres, Y 2017 1 1 2.0 0.003 0.406 100%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.

Citation intensity data generated from LaTeX source analysis.