Citation Analysis

Incorporating Preferences Into Treatment Assignment Problems%
Daido Kido
https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.08963
83
Citation mentions
38
Cited references
7
Sections
6,187
Words (approx)

References by Citation Intensity

Ordered by composite index (descending). Higher values indicate more intensive citation.

# Reference Year Mentions Breadth Sec. Wtd Share Composite Main %
1 Wing, Coady and Clark, M. H. 2017 7 3 11.0 0.084 1.000 100%
2 Kitagawa, Toru and Tetenov, Aleksey 2018 5 3 8.0 0.060 1.000 100%
3 Wennberg, John E. and Barry, Micahel J. and Fowler... 5 3 7.0 0.060 1.000 100%
4 Manski, Charles F. 2004 4 3 6.0 0.048 0.928 100%
5 Ru 4 3 6.0 0.048 0.928 100%
6 Munro, Evan 2023 5 2 7.0 0.060 0.874 100%
7 Angrist, Joshua D. and Imbens, Guido W. and Rubin,... 4 2 7.0 0.048 0.811 100%
8 Long, Qi and Little, Roderick J. and Lin, Xihong 3 2 4.0 0.036 0.737 100%
9 Ida, Takanori and Ishihara, Takunori and Ito, Koic... (self) 2022 3 2 4.0 0.036 0.737 100%
10 Athey, Susan and Wager, Stefan 2021 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
11 Mbakop, Eric and Tabord-Meehan, Max 2021 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
12 Ergin, Haluk I. 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
13 Roth, Alvin E. 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
14 Kojima, Fuhito and Manea, Mihai 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
15 Erdil, Aytek and Ergin, Haluk 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
16 Erdil, Aytek 2 2 3.0 0.024 0.644 100%
17 Sahoo, Roshni and Wager, Stefan 2022 3 1 3.0 0.036 0.585 100%
18 Harris, Keegan and Agarwal, Anish and Podimata, Ch... 2023 3 1 3.0 0.036 0.585 100%
19 Torgerson, David J. and Klaber-Moffett, Jennifer a... 3 1 3.0 0.036 0.585 100%
20 Janevic, Mary R. and Janz, Nancy K. and Dodge, Jul... 2 1 2.0 0.024 0.511 100%
21 Cook, Thomas D. and Campbell, D. T. 1979 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
22 Little, Roderick J. and Long, Qi and Lin, Xihong 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
23 Zoellner, Lori A. and Roy-Byrne, Peter P. and Mavi... 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
24 Hirano, Keisuke and Porter, Jack R. 2009 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
25 Abdulkadiro\ug 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
26 Abdulkadiro\ug 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
27 Gale, D. and Shapley, L. S. 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
28 Brewin, C. R. and Bradley, C. 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
29 Zelen, M. 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
30 Torgerson, David J. and Sibbald, Bonnie 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
31 Narita, Yusuke 2021 1 1 1.0 0.012 0.406 100%
32 Zhou, Zhengyuan and Athey, Susan and Wager, Stefan 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
33 Dubins, L. E. and Freedman, D. A. 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
34 Kitagawa, Toru 2015 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
35 Imbens, Guido W. and Angrist, Joshua D. 1994 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
36 Clark, M. H. 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
37 Shadish, William R. and Clark, M. H. and Steiner, ... 1 1 2.0 0.012 0.406 100%
38 Hoeffding, Wassily 1 1 0.5 0.012 0.087 0%
Measures: Mentions = total in-text citations; Breadth = distinct sections; Sec. Wtd = section-weighted count (body ×2, lit review/appendix ×0.5); Share = mentions / total citations in paper; Composite = geometric mean of normalised count, breadth, and main-text ratio; Main % = fraction of mentions in main text (excl. appendix). (self) = self-citation.